If one of the two lawmakers chosen is from the opposition – keeping the status quo – it would be a sign of compromise by Netanyahu after weeks of talks with his opponents and a setback for hardliners in his religious-nationalist government who want more control over judicial appointments.

It could affect the Supreme Court, which must replace the chief justice and another judge, in coming months.

“There are no guarantees with someone you don’t trust,” opposition head Yair Lapid told Army Radio, although he and other lawmakers have indicated over the past week that agreements on candidates for the panel have been reached.

But Netanyahu’s Likud party has kept the opposition guessing, saying on Monday a decision would be made next week.

Critics denounce the judicial plan pushed by Netanyahu, who is on trial on graft charges that he denies. They say the move to let parliament override many Supreme Court decisions threatens the independence of the courts and endangers democracy.

The court acts as a check in Israel‘s political system which has few other balances, given it has just one chamber of parliament.

WASHINGTON WANTS CONSENSUS

Until now, Netanyahu’s talks with the opposition to defuse the crisis have yielded little. He has also sent mixed messages about the overhaul’s fate, compounding uncertainty that has hit the economy and the shekel.

The vote on the panel makeup could provide clarity for Israelis and Western allies, including Washington which has urged Netanyahu to reach a consensus over legal reforms.

If parliament adheres to a custom in the confidential vote by electing an opposition member, it would signal to opponents that Netanyahu was serious about a compromise and was ready to adjust his judicial plan.

Facing dissension from within his party, Netanyahu told Likud on May 29: “The reform is not dead but we are making every effort in talks in order to reach broad agreements.”

Likud Justice Minister Yariv Levin, a driving force behind the overhaul plan, says he and his allies want to give elected politicians more sway over what they see as a left-leaning and over-reaching Supreme Court.

Critics say it will politicise the judiciary.

Lawmaker Keti Shitrit, who is on the Likud team that is in negotiations with the opposition, said: “The reform will happen, just not in its original form.”

The Prime Minister’s Office Director-General Yossi Shelly played down questions about the judicial discussion. “I think that ultimately it will end positively,” he told Kan radio.