{"id":113835,"date":"2024-06-24T17:05:14","date_gmt":"2024-06-24T15:05:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=113835"},"modified":"2024-06-24T07:48:17","modified_gmt":"2024-06-24T05:48:17","slug":"30-05-90","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=113835","title":{"rendered":"Biden\u2019s whole-of-government hostility to Israel"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>Biden\u2019s whole-of-government hostility to Israel<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n

CAROLINE B. GLICK<\/strong><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

The administration demands Jerusalem implement a policy of backing the establishment of a Palestinian state.<\/strong><\/h4>\n

.
\nPresident Joe Biden announces a proposed ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, May 31, 2024. Photo by Chip Somodevilla\/Getty Images<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

The top U.S.-Israel story of the week is the prospect of a massive ground war in Lebanon.<\/span><\/p>\n

The main question dominating the discourse is whether the Biden administration intends to provide Israel with the munitions it requires to prosecute such a war successfully. The White House says it has Israel\u2019s back. But recent U.S.-Israel backstories indicate that Israeli anxiety about the U.S. position on munitions is well founded.<\/span><\/p>\n

Two back stories that have generated minor splashes signal clearly that contrary to President Joe Biden\u2019s oft repeated \u201cironclad commitment to Israel\u2019s security,\u201d his administration is implementing a whole-of-government policy of criminalizing Israel and its citizens.<\/span><\/p>\n

The first story relates to stepped-up U.S. sanctions against Israeli nationals and organizations. The second is the reported change in U.S. policy regarding visa and immigration applications from Israeli citizens.<\/span><\/p>\n

Immediately after the Hamas-led Palestinian invasion and slaughter of Oct. 7, the Egyptian government announced that contrary to the binding requirements of international humanitarian law, Egypt would prohibit Gaza residents from transiting Gaza\u2019s international border into Egypt to seek refuge either in Egypt or in third countries through Egypt.<\/span><\/p>\n

Far from opposing Egypt\u2019s unlawful action, the U.S. administration supported it. Egypt was not responsible for protecting the residents of Gaza from the war their regime opened against Israel. Israel was.<\/span><\/p>\n

Days after Oct. 7, the administration began demanding that Israel provide a constant and ever-growing supply of food, water, medicine and other goods to the residents of Gaza. As the administration routinely ratcheted up its demands, it cited wholly unsupported, and\u00a0now discredited<\/a>, claims from the U.N. that Gaza was on the verge of famine.<\/span><\/p>\n

Although the Netanyahu government quickly folded under the administration\u2019s barely disguised threats to accuse Israel of war crimes, the Israeli public has been all but united in its opposition to the U.S. position.<\/span><\/p>\n

Videos from Gaza have emerged daily since November showing Hamas gunmen seizing the aid trucks and shooting civilians who try to seize bags of flour and other goods from the trucks. Last week, former U.S. Middle East envoy Dennis Ross reported on his X account, \u201cA UN official told me lately that 80 percent of the humanitarian assistance going into Gaza has been looted by criminal gangs or Hamas.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

After Israel began permitting hundreds of truckloads of supplies to enter Gaza directly from Israel in late January, a Direct Polls survey found that 82% of Israelis believed that the trucks should only be allowed to enter Gaza if Hamas released all the hostages.<\/span><\/p>\n

A near consensus view in Israel throughout the past eight and a half months is that the humanitarian aid undermines the war effort by keeping Hamas fully supplied; maintains Hamas\u2019s grip on power by enabling the terror regime to control who gets fed and cared for; and endangers IDF soldiers on the ground in Gaza.<\/span><\/p>\n

Tzav 9<\/a>\u00a0(aka \u201cEmergency Orders\u201d) is a protest group that a handful of concerned Israeli citizens formed in January to protest the truck convoys. With no funding or institutional backing, Tzav 9 called for citizens to show up at crossing points between Israel and Gaza to block the trucks from passing into Gaza. The call resonated so deeply with the public that within days of Tzav 9\u2019s first call, Israelis from all walks of life were camping out in the field by the crossing points and walking for hours to arrive at the crossing points at dawn, day after day after day.<\/span><\/p>\n

Hostages\u2019 families, families of soldiers fighting in Gaza, and victims of the Oct. 7 slaughter led many of the protests. More than 15,000 Israelis from all sectors of society participated in the protest group\u2019s actions in the intervening months. Tzav 9\u2019s operations were legal, falling under the definition of protected speech. On occasions where protesters broke the law, they were physically removed from the protest sites by police and arrested.<\/span><\/p>\n

The administration made no secret of its anger over these lawful political protests. U.S. officials from Biden down roundly condemned Tzav 9\u2019s protests.<\/span><\/p>\n

Rather than accept the right of Israelis to oppose the administration\u2019s policies, on June 14, the State Department\u00a0sanctioned Tzav 9<\/a>. It ordered a freeze on whatever assets it may have, threatened sanctions against any organization or individual that supports Tzav 9\u2019s work, and banned Tzav 9\u2019s representatives from entering the U.S.<\/span><\/p>\n

The basis for the sanctions was President\u00a0Biden\u2019s Executive Order 11415<\/a>\u00a0from Feb. 1. That order makes Israelis liable for sanction if they \u201cundermine the foreign policy objectives of the United States, including the viability of the two-state solution and ensuring Israelis and Palestinian can attain equal measures of security, prosperity, and freedom.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Order 11415 relates only to action in Judea and Samaria, and is arguably irrelevant to Tzav 9, whose operations are directly solely against the resupply of Hamas in Gaza.<\/span><\/p>\n

But no matter.<\/span><\/p>\n

The fact that the administration is using Order 11415 against Tzav 9, a popular protest group whose positions are supported by the vast majority of Israelis, demonstrates that although the order was billed as targeting \u201cextremist settler violence,\u201d it was really conceived as a way to sanction the up to 80% of Israelis who oppose the administration\u2019s positions on the war in Gaza, and more broadly, oppose its determination to establish a Palestinian state.<\/span><\/p>\n

The administration\u2019s move to sanction Tzav 9 set shock waves through Israel. It raised fears that consensus organizations including the\u00a0Regavim<\/a>\u00a0Movement and government ministers, first and foremost Finance Minister\u00a0Bezalel Smotrich<\/a>, may soon be sanctioned by the U.S.<\/span><\/p>\n

Regavim uses the legal system and public awareness campaigns to protect Israel\u2019s state lands in Judea and Samaria, the Negev and the Galilee against illegal encroachment. Recently, Regavim published a\u00a0massive report<\/a>\u00a0documenting the depth and breadth of the U.S.-funded, -armed and -trained Palestinian security forces\u2019 engagement in terrorism.<\/span><\/p>\n

Regavim has provided logistical support for Tzav 9\u2019s lawful protests. Like its efforts on behalf of Tzav 9, Regavim\u2019s other actions and campaigns enjoy the support of the majority of Israelis.<\/span><\/p>\n

Smotrich has been widely condemned by progressives inside and outside the administration for refusing to transfer funds to the Palestinian Authority due to its support for terrorism. Smotrich has also be singled out for calumny for refusing the authorize the destruction of Israeli building projects that leftist NGOs supported by the U.S. and other foreign governments claim are unlawful.<\/span><\/p>\n

Last Tuesday, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) raised the specter of sanctioning Smotrich during a Senate hearing with Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Barbara Leaf. Van Hollen asked whether Smotrich\u2019s actions place him in violation of Biden\u2019s executive order, and Leaf said that indeed, they do.<\/span><\/p>\n

In other words, as it has Tzav 9, the administration may sanction Regavim and Smotrich for their lawful actions\u2014backed by a wide majority of Israelis\u2014because the administration demands that Israel implement a policy of backing the establishment of a Palestinian state, a move rejected by\u00a099 out of 120 members of Knesset<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

This brings us to U.S. immigration policy regarding Israeli nationals.<\/span><\/p>\n

Last Thursday,<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0Yediot Achronot<\/em>\u2019s veteran reporter Itamar Eichner published a\u00a0bombshell report<\/a>\u00a0titled \u201cU.S. asks Israelis applying for green card whether they committed war crimes.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Eichner reported a number of instances where IDF veterans and reservists applying for U.S. entry permits ranging from tourist visas to\u00a0green cards<\/a>\u00a0have faced detailed interrogations\u2014under oath\u2014regarding their service in the IDF.<\/span><\/p>\n

For instance, Yuval, an Israeli high-tech manager working in Silicon Valley, assumed everything was in order with his green card application and was stunned to receive a letter from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) requiring him to submit a sworn affidavit describing his military service in granular detail.<\/span><\/p>\n

Among other things, the letter inquired, \u201cDid you participate as a combatant in battles during your military service? If so, please describe your activity\/role in these battles; Did you command soldiers in the army? If yes, please describe the aspects of your command; Have you ever guarded (or commanded others to guard) detainees? Did you use explosives during your military service? If so, detail the types of weapons or explosives you were trained on.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cHave you ever actually used weapons or explosives? If so, what weapons or explosives did you use? How did you use weapons or explosives? On how many occasions did you use weapons or explosives? How often did you use weapons or explosives? Did you use a weapon and\/or an explosive against another person? If so, the circumstances must be detailed, and explain why you used a weapon and\/or an explosive against another person\/people.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

In other words, as it has Tzav 9, the administration may sanction Regavim and Smotrich for their lawful actions\u2014backed by a wide majority of Israelis\u2014because the administration demands that Israel implement a policy of backing the establishment of a Palestinian state, a move rejected by\u00a099 out of 120 members of Knesset<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

This brings us to U.S. immigration policy regarding Israeli nationals.<\/span><\/p>\n

Last Thursday,\u00a0Yediot Achronot<\/em>\u2019s veteran reporter Itamar Eichner published a\u00a0bombshell report<\/a>\u00a0titled \u201cU.S. asks Israelis applying for green card whether they committed war crimes.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Eichner reported a number of instances where IDF veterans and reservists applying for U.S. entry permits ranging from tourist visas to\u00a0green cards<\/a>\u00a0have faced detailed interrogations\u2014under oath\u2014regarding their service in the IDF.<\/span><\/p>\n

For instance, Yuval, an Israeli high-tech manager working in Silicon Valley, assumed everything was in order with his green card application and was stunned to receive a letter from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) requiring him to submit a sworn affidavit describing his military service in granular detail.<\/span><\/p>\n

Among other things, the letter inquired, \u201cDid you participate as a combatant in battles during your military service? If so, please describe your activity\/role in these battles; Did you command soldiers in the army? If yes, please describe the aspects of your command; Have you ever guarded (or commanded others to guard) detainees? Did you use explosives during your military service? If so, detail the types of weapons or explosives you were trained on.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cHave you ever actually used weapons or explosives? If so, what weapons or explosives did you use? How did you use weapons or explosives? On how many occasions did you use weapons or explosives? How often did you use weapons or explosives? Did you use a weapon and\/or an explosive against another person? If so, the circumstances must be detailed, and explain why you used a weapon and\/or an explosive against another person\/people.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Revital, a reserve combat soldier Eichner spoke to, related that she had traveled to Europe after completing reserve duty in Gaza and was hoping to continue on to the U.S.<\/span><\/p>\n

A consular officer in a U.S. consulate in Western Europe questioned her for half an hour about the nature of her service in Gaza, and then informed her that she was barred from entering the U.S.<\/span><\/p>\n

Until recently, Israelis were subjected to questioning about their IDF service that was little different from questioning citizens of other allied nations, like France or Britain, received. Interviewed by Eichner, Israeli immigration attorney Liam Schwartz said there is no question that the policy has changed.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAn investigation that seeks explanations about how, when and why weapons and\/or explosives were used against another person is intended to understand if you have committed war crimes. A question regarding the custody of detainees is intended to \u2018catch\u2019 the military personnel and police officers who participated in the arrests in the West Bank. A demand for information regarding the active participation as a combatant in battles may also be used by the authorities for the purpose of formulating their position in relation to acts defined as genocide,\u201d Schwartz said.<\/span><\/p>\n

Conditions in the U.S. are currently not amenable to a government move to criminalize either the IDF or Israeli soldiers and officers. But those conditions may change. In the meantime, the Biden administration is amassing a large database of sworn statements from soldiers and officers that can be manipulated to be used against them and the country.<\/span><\/p>\n

Since last Wednesday, when Prime Minister\u00a0Benjamin Netanyahu<\/a>\u00a0revealed that the administration largely stopped providing Israel with vital munitions six months ago, the administration has been issuing breathless, infuriated, self-righteous non-denials every day.<\/span><\/p>\n

Never mind that it was the administration, not Netanyahu, that began leaking its policy of \u201cslow walking\u201d munitions, including artillery and tank shells and JDAM kits and aerial bombs, in January.<\/span><\/p>\n

hostility towards Israel, a hostility exposed by its sanctions against law abiding Israelis advancing consensus positions, and its new immigration policies, both show that the smart money is on Netanyahu. Not only is the Israeli leader telling the truth. His decision to expose the administration\u2019s dirty, double-game against the Jewish state was absolutely necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Zawarto\u015b\u0107 publiko<\/em>wanych artyku\u0142\u00f3w i materia\u0142\u00f3w nie reprezentuje pogl\u0105d\u00f3w ani opinii Reunion’68,<\/em>
\nani te\u017c webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyra\u017anie zaznaczone.
\nTwoje uwagi, linki, w\u0142asne artyku\u0142y lub wiadomo\u015bci prze\u015blij na adres:
\n<\/em>webmaster@reunion68.com<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Biden\u2019s whole-of-government hostility to Israel CAROLINE B. GLICK The administration demands Jerusalem implement a policy of backing the establishment of a Palestinian state. . President Joe Biden announces a proposed ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, May 31, 2024. Photo by Chip Somodevilla\/Getty Images The top U.S.-Israel story of the week is the prospect […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[26,24],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113835"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=113835"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113835\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":113852,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113835\/revisions\/113852"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=113835"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=113835"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=113835"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}