{"id":114848,"date":"2024-08-09T17:05:00","date_gmt":"2024-08-09T15:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=114848"},"modified":"2024-08-09T07:53:10","modified_gmt":"2024-08-09T05:53:10","slug":"10-05-100","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=114848","title":{"rendered":"Exclusive: Netanyahu at War"},"content":{"rendered":"

Benjamin Netanyahu in the Prime Minister\u2019s office in Jerusalem, on Aug 4.Paolo Pellegrin\u2014Magnum Photos for TIME<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/a>Exclusive: Netanyahu at War<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n

Eric Cortellessa \/ Jerusalem<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

F<\/span>or the past 10 months, Benjamin Netanyahu has refused to apologize for leaving Israel vulnerable to Hamas\u2019 Oct. 7 terrorist attack. After the deaths of 1,200 people and the\u00a0abduction<\/a>\u00a0of hundreds more, a traumatized Israeli public heard abject admissions of responsibility from the heads of the Israel Defense Forces and Shin Bet, the country\u2019s domestic security service, but none from Netanyahu, who had been Prime Minister for almost a year when the attack happened, and had presided over a more than 10-year strategy of tacit acceptance of Hamas rule in Gaza. His only apology was for a social media post blaming his own security chiefs for failing to foil the assault. So, early in a 66-minute conversation with TIME on Aug. 4 in the Prime Minister\u2019s office in Jerusalem, the question is, Would he make an apology?<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cApologize?\u201d he asks back. \u201cOf course, of course. I am sorry, deeply, that something like this happened. And you always look back and you say, Could we have done things that would have prevented it?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

For Netanyahu, who first occupied the dowdy Kaplan Street offices in 1996, it\u2019s a fraught question. Through a combination of electoral vicissitudes, sweeping regional changes, and his own political gifts, his almost 17-year cumulative tenure is longer than that of anyone else who has led Israel, a country only two years older than he is. Over that span, Netanyahu\u2019s political endurance has been built around one consistent argument: that he\u2019s the only leader who can ensure Israel\u2019s safety.<\/span><\/p>\n

\nPhotograph by Paolo Pellegrin\u2014Magnum Photos for TIME<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

But in the wake of the worst slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust, with more than 40,000 Gazans\u00a0dead<\/a>\u00a0in the ensuing conflict, Israel under Netanyahu is not blessed with peace but besieged by war. As we speak, the country is on edge for an expected aerial\u00a0attack<\/a>\u00a0from Iran, the second in four months. Shops are shuttered, and pedestrians stay within sprinting distance of bomb shelters. The fighting is ongoing in Gaza, with more than 100 hostages still held by Hamas. Much to the\u00a0frustration<\/a>\u00a0of the Biden Administration, Netanyahu still has not articulated a credible plan to end the war or a vision for how the Israelis and the Palestinians can peacefully coexist. Instead, he\u2019s bracing for escalating conflict on even more fronts: in the north with Hezbollah in Lebanon; in the Gulf with the Houthis in Yemen; and most of all, with Israel\u2019s nemesis Iran. \u201cWe\u2019re facing not merely Hamas,\u201d Netanyahu says. \u201cWe\u2019re facing a full-fledged Iranian axis, and we understand that we have to organize ourselves for broader defense.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The story of how Israel arrived at this precarious moment is entwined with Netanyahu\u2019s personal ambitions and vulnerabilities. In the months before Oct.\u00a07, Israeli society was sundered by his support of right-wing legislation diminishing the power of the Supreme Court. The collective trauma of the Hamas attack may have brought Jewish Israelis together, but deepened doubts about their Prime Minister, with 72% saying he should resign, either now or after the war, according to a July poll for Israel\u2019s most watched television station. Abroad, the toll of the Gaza war can be tallied in Israel\u2019s increasing isolation: arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant sought by the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes; American college campuses convulsed by anti-Israel protests, the largest of their kind since Vietnam; antisemitism rising around the globe.<\/span><\/p>\n

On his first trip overseas since the war\u2019s outbreak, Netanyahu\u00a0addressed<\/a>\u00a0a joint session of Congress on July 25 in hopes of reinforcing his nation\u2019s most essential alliance. But behind the standing ovations, the advice from both ends of the political spectrum was unanimous: President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and former President Donald Trump all said it was time to end the war in Gaza.<\/span><\/p>\n

Netanyahu\u2019s response? Two days after arriving home, without a heads-up to the White House, a bomb almost certainly planted by Israel killed Hamas\u2019 most prominent negotiator in a heavily guarded government guest house in Tehran. With every passing week,\u00a0critics<\/a>\u00a0raise further\u00a0alarms<\/a>\u00a0that Netanyahu is drawing out the Gaza campaign for personal political reasons, arguing that a deal for a permanent cease-fire that would bring home the remaining hostages would also open the door to elections that could result in his removal from office. Biden himself told TIME on May 28 that there was \u201cevery reason to draw that conclusion,\u201d and in Israel, many do. \u201cNetanyahu is focused on his longevity in power more than the interests of the Israeli people or the State of Israel,\u201d\u00a0says<\/a>\u00a0former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, who for four years served as his Defense Minister. \u201cIt will take half a generation to repair the damage that Netanyahu has caused in the last year.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

A defiant Netanyahu, 74, calls these charges a \u201ccanard.\u201d He insists the goal in Gaza must be a victory so decisive that when the fighting stops, Hamas can make no claim to govern in Palestinian territories or pose a threat to Israel. Otherwise, he argues, it will only condemn his country to a future of more massacres at the hands of enemies who want to eliminate the world\u2019s only Jewish state. With the conflict expanding, Netanyahu says he is puncturing the confidence of every other element of Iran\u2019s \u201caxis of resistance,\u201d a network of nonstate actors throughout the Middle East with a collective arsenal of rockets trained on\u00a0Israel.<\/span><\/p>\n

If the war in Gaza widens into a regional conflict, the consequences for Israel and the world would be dangerously unpredictable. The U.S. and the West\u00a0risk<\/a>\u00a0being dragged into another Middle East quagmire. Israelis increasingly worry that the war supposedly launched to save Israel will imperil it. Among their most profound fears is that the cycle of violence and the perception it shapes of Israel for the next generation will cause lasting damage to its survival and its soul.<\/span><\/p>\n

For Netanyahu, who says he\u2019s waging an existential war, it\u2019s a risk he recognizes, but one he\u2019s willing to take.\u00a0\u201cBeing destroyed has bigger implications about Israel\u2019s security,\u201d he says. \u201cI\u2019d rather have bad press than a good obituary.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Protesters demanding a hostage-release deal outside Netanyahu\u2019s Jerusalem residence on Aug. 3.Paolo Pellegrin\u2014Magnum Photos for TIME<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Earlier this year, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken flew to Tel Aviv to meet Israeli officials in the Kirya, the towering office complex from which the Prime Minister and his Cabinet were conducting the war. Israel\u2019s bombardment of Gaza had already caused an estimated 30,000 deaths, a count by the Hamas-led Health Ministry that doesn\u2019t distinguish between militants and civilians, but is accepted by the U.N. and the White House. Nearly 2 million Palestinians had been displaced. It was a humanitarian catastrophe inflaming the world, and Blinken\u2019s\u00a0message<\/a>\u00a0to Netanyahu was simple: Wind down the war, you have achieved your objective, Hamas can no longer carry out another Oct. 7.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThat\u2019s not our objective,\u201d Netanyahu replied, according to a source familiar with the exchange. \u201cOur objective is to completely destroy Hamas\u2019 military and governing capabilities.\u201d The larger, more essential goal, Netanyahu argued, was restoring Israel\u2019s principle of deterrence. The price of Oct.\u00a07 had to be sufficiently high for Hamas that any other power considering an attack on Israel would fear similar destruction. While Israel faces a cynical enemy that endangers its own people to delegitimize the Jewish state, the price of that full-throttle approach was already evident: the civilian death toll was mounting, Palestinians struggled to access basic health\u00a0care, and there was a shortage of food and water. The calamity spawned accusations of a disproportionate counterattack. \u201cThis is collective punishment,\u201d says Rashid Khalidi, a Columbia University professor who worked on Palestinian peace negotiations in the 1990s. \u201cYou don\u2019t punish civilians for what Hamas did.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Netanyahu dismisses those allegations out of hand. \u201cWe\u2019ve gone out of our way to enable humanitarian assistance since the beginning of the war,\u201d he says, citing Israel\u2019s delivery of aid through food trucks and air drops.<\/span><\/p>\n

To some extent, Netanyahu has been preparing to fight this war his entire adult life. His political career began as a telegenic diplomat explaining Israel\u2019s positions on U.S. television during Iran\u2019s takeover of the U.S. embassy in 1979, and he was elected Prime Minister three times pitching himself as \u201cMr. Security.\u201d That the worst terrorist attack in Israel\u2019s history happened on his watch was a deep wound, forcing a reckoning in Israel over the strategic policy decisions he had championed for decades.<\/span><\/p>\n

The first was allowing Qatar to send funds into the Gaza Strip. Hamas had come to power first by the ballot box (in 2006 elections promoted by U.S. President George W. Bush) and a year later by force of arms, amid factional fighting. Israel first responded by enforcing a blockade on the enclave. But under a policy embraced over the past 10 years by Netanyahu, billions in Qatari cash was allowed into Gaza. The infrastructure it financed included many miles of\u00a0tunnels.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cHamas wore two hats. It wore a terrorist hat and it wore a governance hat after 2007,\u201d says Michael Oren, Netanyahu\u2019s ambassador to Washington from 2009 to 2013. \u201cWe thought that we could incentivize Hamas to wear the governance hat through large infusions of Qatari cash and by allowing Palestinian workers into Israel. Give Hamas something to lose. That was the idea. But it was wrong.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Others saw a more cynical strategy, to deepen divisions between Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, and undermine the prospects for a unified Palestinian state. \u201cHe saw Hamas as an asset and the [West Bank\u2013based] Palestinian Authority as a liability,\u201d says Barak. \u201cAs long as he can hold Hamas alive and kicking and being a threat to Israel, he can easily protect himself against demands from America and from the rest of the world who argued that Israel should look for a way to achieve a breakthrough with the Palestinians.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Netanyahu reportedly said as much at a Likud Party meeting in 2019, according to the Israeli media, but he denies it. Rather, he tells TIME, his approval of Qatari cash infusions was humanitarian: \u201cWe wanted to make sure that Gaza has a functioning civilian administration to avoid humanitarian collapse,\u201d he says. Moreover, he claims, the money didn\u2019t form the basis of Hamas\u2019 eventual threat to Israel. \u201cThe main issue was the transfer of weapons and ammunition from the Sinai into Gaza,\u201d he says. His primary mistake, he says, was acceding to his Security Cabinet\u2019s reluctance to wage full-on war. \u201cOct. 7 showed that those who said that Hamas was deterred were wrong,\u201d he says during the Aug.\u00a04 interview. \u201cIf anything, I didn\u2019t challenge enough the assumption that was common to all the security agencies.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Instead, Israel maintained a policy known as mowing the grass\u2014periodic fighting to degrade Hamas\u2019 military capability and deter its desire to assault Israel. The 2014 Gaza war, during which Hamas sent forces into Israel via tunnels, lasted 51 days. Early in that round, senior Israeli officials say, Netanyahu\u2019s Security Cabinet presented him with a plan to destroy Hamas that estimated the cost in deaths: roughly 10,000 Gazan civilians and nearly 500 Israeli soldiers. \u201cThere was no domestic support for such an action,\u201d says Netanyahu. \u201cThere was certainly no international support for such an action\u2014and you need both.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\nAn airstrike on a school in Deir Al Balah, Gaza, on July 27.Mohammed Saber\u2014EPA-EFE\/Shutterstock<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Mourning Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran on July 31.Arash Khamooshi\u2014The New York Times\/Redux<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

While Hamas was growing stronger in secret, Israel was making a spectacle of its own division. In January 2023, after Netanyahu returned to power for the third time with a coalition that included far-right parties previously considered too extreme to govern, he backed a radical bill to weaken the judiciary. The plan triggered an immense backlash, with tens of thousands of Israelis protesting every weekend. \u201cYou are weakening us, and our enemy is going to see it and we\u2019re going to pay the price,\u201d former Minister of Defense Benny Gantz warned Netanyahu.<\/span><\/p>\n

Netanyahu blames the protesters, thousands of whom declared they wouldn\u2019t serve in the military of an Israel with a diminished democratic foundation. \u201cThe refusal to serve because of an internal political debate\u2014I think that, if anything, that had an effect,\u201d he\u00a0says.<\/span><\/p>\n

Amid this tumult, Hamas had been planning to infiltrate Israel by land, air, and sea, and not just for a one-off attack. The plan on Oct.\u00a07 was to secure the south of Israel and keep moving farther into the north, according to two senior Israeli sources who have reviewed Hamas documentation discovered in Gaza. \u201cThis was not a plan to wound Israel,\u201d says one source who reviewed the documents. \u201cIt was planned to be the first step in the operation to destroy Israel entirely.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

* * *<\/h3>\n

Israel\u2019s invasion of Gaza began on Oct.\u00a027, when Netanyahu launched a full-scale ground operation with aerial\u00a0strikes. The offensive came with a cold calculation; because Hamas intentionally embeds its military infrastructure in densely populated areas, the attacks would inevitably inflict wide-scale civilian casualties. For an Israeli public still reeling from Oct. 7, their deaths became a tragic but necessary price to protect the nation-state established after the Holocaust to provide a safe haven for Jews in their ancestral homeland. A Pew poll in May showed fewer than 20% of Israelis thought the country\u2019s military went \u201ctoo far.\u201d The press here seldom shows images of civilian deaths. In our interview, Netanyahu says the IDF\u2019s \u201cbest estimate\u201d is that the ratio of civilian deaths to military is 1 to 1\u2014extraordinarily low for urban combat. (The U.N. has said that civilians usually\u00a0account\u00a0for 90% of casualties in war.)<\/span><\/p>\n

The hostages remain the focus of domestic attention. In November, Israel and Hamas reached a temporary cease-fire to exchange 105 of them for 240 Palestinian prisoners. When fighting resumed a week later, the humanitarian crisis increasingly became the global focus. Only under intense pressure from the Biden Administration did Netanyahu allow more aid into the Strip. When he prepared to push into the southern Gaza city of Rafah, the last refuge both for displaced civilians and Hamas\u2019 remaining battalions, Netanyahu also found himself up against the American President who had flown in after Oct. 7 to publicly embrace him.<\/span><\/p>\n

Israel seemed more internationally isolated than ever before. Most wounding to Netanyahu was a March cover of the\u00a0Economist,<\/em>\u00a0which he read growing up in the States, headlined \u201cIsrael alone.\u201d That, it turns out, was exaggerated. A few weeks later, on April\u00a014, Iran for the first time launched 300 missiles toward Israel, a retaliation for its attack on a diplomatic facility in Damascus. Under Biden\u2019s stewardship, the American, British, French, and Arab forces all rushed to Israel\u2019s defense.<\/span><\/p>\n

But two things can be true at once. A government anxious to prevent a full-bore regional conflagration might scramble jets to save Israeli lives while also holding grave reservations about what Israel was doing in Gaza. The war had been going on for six months, and Biden wanted Netanyahu to accept a cease-fire-for-hostage deal that would end it. To Biden\u2019s frustration, Netanyahu resisted. He wanted only a temporary pause in the fighting upon the return of the hostages. A longer respite for Hamas stood to cost Netanyahu the support of his far-right governing partners, tanking his fragile coalition. \u201cHe\u2019s risking his government in having a deal with Hamas,\u201d says a senior Israeli official. \u201cBibi will have a hostage deal only when it suits him politically.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

This was the backdrop for Netanyahu\u2019s first trip abroad since Oct.\u00a07, to address a joint session of Congress in Washington. The speech was at first opposed by Biden and Democratic congressional leadership, who knew it would exacerbate party tensions over the Administration\u2019s support for the war. Nearly 130 Democrats skipped it, including Harris, who as Vice President would traditionally preside over the address.<\/span><\/p>\n

A visit intended to showcase solidarity with Israel\u2019s most essential ally instead underscored what was for Israel a growing partisan divide. In recent years, Democratic voters have grown less supportive of Israel and more sympathetic toward Palestinians, according to Gallup. The Gaza war had only intensified the trend.<\/span><\/p>\n

Netanyahu says that\u2019s not his fault. \u201cI don\u2019t think that the much reported erosion of support among some quarters of the American public is related to Israel,\u201d he says. \u201cIt\u2019s more related to America.\u201d He cites a Harvard-Harris survey that in January found that 80% of respondents supported Israel whereas 20% supported Hamas\u2014a significant chunk of support for a terrorist organization. \u201cThere\u2019s a problem that America has,\u201d Netanyahu says. \u201cIt\u2019s not a problem that Israel has.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Netanyahu in his Jerusalem office on Aug. 4.Paolo Pellegrin\u2014Magnum Photos for TIME<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

The partisan divide on display during his trip offered the canny Israeli Premier an opportunity. After the speech he traveled to Trump\u2019s Mediterranean-style Palm Beach mansion to repair his relationship with the billionaire, who remained angry at Netanyahu for backing out of a joint strike on a top Iranian in January 2020, and for congratulating Joe Biden on his election victory. But at Mar-a-Lago, Trump greeted Netanyahu and his wife Sara with open arms, and after their conversation set up a makeshift cabinet meeting around a boardroom table with Netanyahu\u2019s top brass and his own.<\/span><\/p>\n

Perhaps Netanyahu\u2019s ultimate metric of success in the U.S. came as he prepared to fly home. On July 27, the centrist Israeli television station Channel 12 released a poll that showed his leading all three of his potential rivals in a hypothetical snap election.<\/span><\/p>\n

Less than a day after the meeting with Trump, a Hezbollah rocket launched from Lebanon struck a soccer field in northern Israel, killing 12, mostly children. In retaliation for the soccer-field attack, Israel on July\u00a030 bombed a senior Hezbollah commander in a suburb of Beirut\u2014a rare strike in the Lebanese capital.<\/span><\/p>\n

Just hours later, news\u00a0broke<\/a>\u00a0that the Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh had been killed in his sleep in Tehran, where he had just\u00a0attended<\/a>\u00a0the inauguration of the new Iranian President. The Iranians accused the Israelis of the hit, which was reportedly delivered via a bomb secreted into an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps guesthouse. Israel has not confirmed or denied involvement but went on high alert, awaiting the promised Iranian retaliation.<\/span><\/p>\n

Last April, a wider conflict had been narrowly avoided when Iran responded to an Israeli airstrike that killed an Iranian general with a massive but telegraphed direct attack on Israel that was rebuffed with the help of the allied defenses arranged by the U.S. This time, both sides again professed to want to avoid a broader conflict, even as each encounter tested the line between deterrence and provocation.<\/span><\/p>\n

If a larger war can indeed be averted, Netanyahu believes he can transcend the infamy of Oct.\u00a07 in two ways, according to those close to him. One is by successfully ridding Gaza of Hamas. The second: cementing a Saudi-Israel normalization deal. This would be a\u00a0dramatic expansion of the Abraham Accords forged under Trump, which normalized Israel\u2019s ties with four Arab nations. Eviscerating Hamas, then providing the Jewish state a network of alliances in the heart of the Islamic world, would turn a catastrophe into a strategic triumph.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The two goals could intersect in Netanyahu\u2019s vague plan for a postwar Gaza. Once Hamas is out of power, he says, he wants to recruit Arab countries to help install a civilian Palestinian governing entity that wouldn\u2019t pose a threat to Israel. \u201cI\u2019d like to see a civilian administration run by Gazans, perhaps with the support of regional partners,\u201d says Netanyahu. \u201cDemilitarization by Israel, civilian administration by Gaza.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Few Israelis see this as a realistic scenario. \u201cHe doesn\u2019t have any plan for the endgame,\u201d says Efraim Halevy, a former head of Mossad. \u201cFirst of all, it took him a long time to admit that there would be an endgame, but he has never published it as a proposition, and what he has published is very flimsy.\u201d It also strikes Palestinians as unlikely. \u201cNot unless there\u2019s some kind of Palestinian buy-in, and there will not be a buy-in to something that\u2019s not Palestinian run,\u201d says Khalidi. \u201cSomething that\u2019s run by the Emirates or any other alternative is not going to fly.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The fates of Israelis and Palestinians remain inextricably intertwined. If Israel does not find a way to peacefully separate from the millions of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, it faces a future of either absorbing them as citizens and losing its Jewish majority, or depriving them of the rights and freedoms afforded to the Jewish population and losing its democracy. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Netanyahu has no interest in overseeing the creation of a Palestinian state. Rather, he offers a vision of limited pockets of autonomy in Palestinian areas where Israel maintains overriding security control, a version of the situation in the West Bank today. \u201cThat\u2019s a detraction of sovereign powers,\u201d he admits, \u201cthere\u2019s no question about it.\u201d But he also tacitly recognizes the dilemma Israel faces. \u201cI agree we should maintain a Jewish majority, but I think we should do it in democratic means,\u201d he says. \u201cThat\u2019s why I don\u2019t want to incorporate the Palestinians in Judea and Samaria as citizens of Israel,\u201d referring to the biblical name of the West Bank. \u201cIt means that they should run their own lives. They should vote for their own institutions. They should have their own self-governance. But they should not have the power to threaten us.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The Saudis have publicly said Israel needs to be taking steps toward a Palestinian state in order to clinch a normalization deal. But Netanyahu\u2019s far-right ruling coalition won\u2019t tolerate any move in that direction. Naming Itamar Ben-Gvir as National Security Minister and Belazel Smotrich as Finance Minister is, as Union for Reform Judaism president Rick Jacobs has put it, like a U.S. President welcoming into the Cabinet the KKK. The former cheered on the assassination of former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin; the latter has said Israel would be \u201cjustified\u201d in starving Palestinians to death but the world won\u2019t let them. Together, they have undertaken a bureaucratic push to eliminate any possibility of Palestinian sovereignty. Smotrich has authorized illegal Israeli outposts in the West Bank and streamlined the approval of settlement activities to expand Israel\u2019s footprint in the occupied territories.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Extremist elements have seeped deeper and deeper into Israeli society since Oct.\u00a07. At the end of July, a Palestinian detainee was rushed to the hospital with severe wounds after being sexually abused with a polelike object. Far-right demonstrators, including some lawmakers, stormed a military base to protest the arrest of nine suspects.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The compounding crises may have Israel at the greatest risk since its founding 76 years ago. Halevy, the former Mossad chief, views the situation ominously. \u201cThere were 70 or so years between the temples,\u201d he says, referring to the last two periods the Jewish people had sovereignty in Israel. \u201cYou can say that there is a pattern here.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Amid the gathering sense of existential danger, Netanyahu is, as always, pitching himself as the man who can ensure that Zionism survives the war. \u201cIt will, if we win,\u201d he says. \u201cAnd if we don\u2019t, our future will be in great jeopardy.\u201d Barak, the former Prime Minister, says Netanyahu is in his psychological element. \u201cHe genuinely believes that he\u2019s saving Israel,\u201d says Barak. \u201cNot that he\u2019s responsible for one of the worst events in its history.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Ultimately, the Israeli electorate will determine its future. Though 7 in 10 Israelis say he should step down, the Channel 12 poll showed Netanyahu winning a plurality of 32% support. \u201cThere\u2019s a disconnect between public opinion, which is a majority against him in every measure, and his potential for him to stay in power,\u201d says Dahlia Scheindlin, an Israeli pollster. \u201cThat doesn\u2019t necessarily translate into losing power in elections.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The country\u2019s own fraught history suggests Netanyahu\u2019s vulnerability. Prime Minister Golda Meir resigned months after the Yom Kippur War of 1973, when Egypt and Syria attacked Israel on the holiest day of the Jewish year, killing over 2,600 Israeli soldiers. Netanyahu has himself been a harsh judge of leaders who oversaw military disasters. In 2008, after a damning report was published on Prime Minister Ehud Olmert\u2019s management of the 2006 Lebanon war, he called Olmert unfit and incompetent. \u201cThe government is in charge of the military, and it failed miserably,\u201d Netanyahu said at the time. \u201cThe political echelon and its leader refuse to take responsibility and exhibit personal integrity and leadership\u2014which is what the decisive majority of the public expects them to do.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

In his office on Kaplan Street, TIME asks Netanyahu whether he intends to remain Prime Minister. \u201cI will stay in office as long as I believe I can help lead Israel to a future of security, enduring security and prosperity,\u201d he replies. And would he say an opposition leader who presided over Israel\u2019s worst security failure should stay in power?<\/span><\/p>\n

Netanyahu pauses to think through his answer. \u201cIt depends what they do,\u201d he says. \u201cWhat do they do? Are they capable of leading the country in war? Can they lead it to victory? Can they assure that the postwar situation will be one of peace and security? If the answer is yes, they should stay in power.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\u201cIn any case,\u201d he says, \u201cthat\u2019s the decision of the people.\u201d\u00a0\u2014With reporting by\u00a0Vera Bergengruen\/Washington<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0Leslie Dickstein\/New\u00a0York<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Zawarto\u015b\u0107 publikowanych artyku\u0142\u00f3w i materia\u0142\u00f3w nie reprezentuje pogl\u0105d\u00f3w ani opinii Reunion’68,<\/em>
\nani te\u017c webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyra\u017anie zaznaczone.
\nTwoje uwagi, linki, w\u0142asne artyku\u0142y lub wiadomo\u015bci prze\u015blij na adres:
\n<\/em>webmaster@reunion68.com<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Benjamin Netanyahu in the Prime Minister\u2019s office in Jerusalem, on Aug 4.Paolo Pellegrin\u2014Magnum Photos for TIME Exclusive: Netanyahu at War Eric Cortellessa \/ Jerusalem For the past 10 months, Benjamin Netanyahu has refused to apologize for leaving Israel vulnerable to Hamas\u2019 Oct. 7 terrorist attack. After the deaths of 1,200 people and the\u00a0abduction\u00a0of hundreds more, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[26,24],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114848"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=114848"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114848\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":114868,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114848\/revisions\/114868"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=114848"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=114848"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=114848"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}