![](\"https:\/\/tablet-mag-images.b-cdn.net\/production\/d92683cee217d614ce8408cfc1d3300a1a3135b0-3800x2534.jpg?w=1300&q=70&auto=format&dpr=1\")
American city-dwellers are especially justified in fearing the economy is about to collapse on them. The all-item urban consumer price index has climbed from 262 in January 2021 to 324 this past September, with the primary residence rent index rising from 344 to 438 over the same period, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. One possible takeaway from Zohran\u2019s leap from backbencher state assemblyman to mayor of New York City is that voters tend to reward the one person in an election who makes a good enough show of honestly caring about their real-life concerns, regardless of the substance of the policies on offer. This fantastic ability to buck the limits of the current politics in identifying and articulating a deeply felt problem, joined to almost slapstick inadequacy at solving the problem in question, is an obvious common point between Mamdani and Trump. In fact, the president has already said he is looking forward to eventually meeting the incoming socialist mayor of his hometown.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Mamdani\u2019s centerpiece affordability proposal is additional rent control in what\u2019s already perhaps the most regulated major rental market in America, \u201cfreeze the rent\u201d being the \u201chope and change\u201d of the 2025 New York mayoral vote. But in a new\u00a0essay<\/a>\u00a0for The Free Press, author and Manhattan property manager Matt Miller elucidates the dangers of populist affordability politics. As Miller explains, even pre-Mamdani, New York laws limited monthly rent increases on regulated units to \u201cbetween 1\/144th and 1\/180th<\/a>\u00a0of what you spend on improvements \u2026 and only on the first $30,000 or $50,000 of costs,\u201d meaning it takes 12 to 15 years for a landlord to recuperate the expense of bringing a unit back to market. As a result, some 50,000 rent-controlled New York City apartments are now empty, a whopping 2.5% of the rental stock in a city with a 1.2% vacancy rate\u2014and this is before Mamdani\u2019s promised freeze on regulated rents makes it even harder for building operators to stay above water. Miller used the example of a recently deceased Manhattan tenant to show the near impossibility of bringing rent-regulated units back online, even now, before Mamdani\u2019s been sworn in:<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n For existing tenants, rents on stabilized units rise according to the annual increases allowed by the city\u2019s\u00a0Rent Guidelines Board<\/a>. In 1984, my tenant\u2019s rent was $300.15 a month. When he died in 2021, he was paying $880.53 a month. Typically, studios in that area can rent for $3,000, even with pretty basic renovations.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n According to the board, the average cost to operate an apartment in a rent-stabilized Manhattan building built before 1974 was\u00a0$1,560 a month<\/a>, not including mortgage payments. Rounding for simplicity\u2019s sake and assuming that I did $50,000 of renovations, that maximum legal rent on this apartment would only increase to about $1,230. After all the work was done, I would still be upside down each month on that apartment.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n Since New York property owners usually have both regulated and unregulated units in their portfolios\u2014sometimes in the same building\u2014tenants in those $3,000-a-month nonregulated units effectively subsidize the rent-controlled tenants, who are locked into spectacular deals for the entirety of their lives and their children\u2019s lives. Roughly half of the city\u2019s rental supply is under some form of rent control, and though losing mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo never got around to mentioning it during the campaign, one person\u2019s rent freeze is necessarily another person\u2019s rent hike.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n The people living under rent control aren\u2019t safe from its consequences either. If operating a regulated residential building is no longer profitable, owners will either bring units offline or sell their buildings to institutions that can wait out the Mamdani era, like investment banks or private equity concerns. The result will be an illiquid rental market in which it will be more difficult for New Yorkers to find new housing when they want it or require it. Meanwhile, the quality of the regulated housing stock will deteriorate as landlords lose the financial ability or the motivation to maintain their buildings. It\u2019s not as if an unregulated $4,000-a-month New York apartment is especially luxurious. You could find your magical 600 square feet on a postcard block in Prospect Heights and still go to bed each night wondering when in the early morning that clanging heating system installed in the 1910s is going to wake you up.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Affordability mania risks creating a politics of resentment, made even more toxic by the reality and urgency of the issue itself. In New York, Mamdani voters believed their man could shift the costs of city life from their own pockets to New York\u2019s allegedly thieving class of owners and landlords, demons who care only about profiting off of the stolen dreams of their renters. As a result of their sincere belief in this embittered caricature of their socio-economic predicament, the Mamdanians probably just voted for an even more warped and expensive rental market.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Mamdani\u2019s affordability politics also pits somewhat arbitrarily assigned groups of renters against one another. As Miller hints, one of the more perverse things about New York rent control is that it isn\u2019t really needs-tested: His rent-stabilized tenants have included \u201cclassical pianists, opera singers, writers, [and] politicians,\u201d as well as \u201ca carousel of deadbeats, tech bros, people who bring home different \u2018dates\u2019 each night of the week, and a Venezuelan political activist.\u201d None of these people sound like they\u2019re grifting the system\u2014but they did enjoy a privilege that not every New Yorker has. Under the banner of \u201cfreeze the rent,\u201d Mamdani promised to lock in the existing advantages of people lucky enough to currently live in a rent-controlled apartment, while subjecting nonregulated renters to an even more distorted market. The latter category of New Yorker might want to start looking for options elsewhere. Maybe Argentina?<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n According to a March\u00a0article<\/a>\u00a0in\u00a0Reason<\/em>\u00a0magazine, President Javier Milei\u2019s elimination of sweeping rent-control laws resulted in a near-instant 180% increase in the number of Buenos Aires rentals listed on the country\u2019s leading online real-estate portal, as well as in a fall in inflation-adjusted rents and a decrease in renters stuck in \u201cshort-term workarounds.\u201d Many New Yorkers know the special hell of having to move every 18 months through no particular fault of their own, with life in the city always in danger of becoming an unending slog of short-term workarounds. Could rent control be to blame for that, too? Sadly, this is a question our new mayor was more or less elected not to ask.<\/span><\/p>\n Armin Rosen<\/strong> is a staff writer for Tablet Magazine.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Zawarto\u015b\u0107 publikowanych artyku\u0142\u00f3w i materia\u0142\u00f3w nie reprezentuje pogl\u0105d\u00f3w ani opinii Reunion’68,<\/em> Mamdani\u2019s \u2018Affordability\u2019 Grift Armin Rosen Nothing\u2019s getting cheaper, folks New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani holds up a campaign shirt as he prepares to board the subway on March 24, 2025 in New York City \/ Michael M. Santiago\/Getty Images For many Americans, the issue of greatest salience has nothing to do with the Middle […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[33,24],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127146"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=127146"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127146\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":127170,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/127146\/revisions\/127170"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=127146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=127146"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=127146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\nani te\u017c webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyra\u017anie zaznaczone.
\nTwoje uwagi, linki, w\u0142asne artyku\u0142y lub wiadomo\u015bci prze\u015blij na adres:
\n<\/em>webmaster@reunion68.com<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.reunion68.com\/Biuletyn\/img\/tablet-1.png\")
<\/a>Mamdani\u2019s \u2018Affordability\u2019 Grift<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/h3>\nArmin Rosen<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n
\n