{"id":55643,"date":"2017-09-04T17:00:29","date_gmt":"2017-09-04T15:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=55643"},"modified":"2017-09-04T07:18:58","modified_gmt":"2017-09-04T05:18:58","slug":"10-05-21","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=55643","title":{"rendered":"J Street Rewrites History to Create \u2018Palestine\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>J Street Rewrites History to Create \u2018Palestine\u2019<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n

Stephen M. Flatow \/ JNS.org<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

J Street Executive Director Jeremy Ben-Ami. Photo: J Street Facebook page.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

JNS.org \u2013 The US government\u2019s reluctance to demand the immediate creation of a Palestinian state has sent J Street into a panic. With its candidates having been defeated in elections on both sides of the ocean, and its proposals crumbling in the face of reality, J Street is trying one last desperate strategy: rewriting history to claim that Palestinian statehood has been supported by everybody, everywhere, for as long as anyone can remember.<\/span><\/p>\n

Asked by reporters on August 24 about the Palestinian state issue, State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said: \u201cWe are not going to state what the outcome has to be. It has to be workable to both sides. That\u2019s the best view as to not really bias one side over the other, to make sure that they can work through it.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Nauert\u2019s statement was simple, logical and reasonable. But her failure to pledge a full-throated endorsement of the Palestinian agenda sent J Street into a tizzy. The J Street leaders fired off an overheated press release that declared: \u201cFor more than two decades, responsible Israeli and Palestinian leaders, US presidents of both parties and virtually the entire international community have understood that a two-state solution is the only viable way to end the conflict.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Literally everything in J Street\u2019s declaration is erroneous.<\/span><\/p>\n

American presidents have not supported Palestinian statehood \u201cfor more than two decades.\u201d George W. Bush was the first president to publicly support a Palestinian state while in office. That was in 2002, i.e. 15 years ago, not \u201cmore than two decades.\u201d Can\u2019t anybody at J Street do basic math?<\/span><\/p>\n

Not only that, but Bush\u2019s support was conditional. In his June 25, 2002, speech about a Palestinian state, Bush said that such a state could come about only if the Palestinian people elected \u201cnew leaders not compromised by terror.\u201d The Palestinians, of course, did exactly the opposite.<\/span><\/p>\n

The only president who has unconditionally and publicly supported Palestinian statehood while in office was Barack Obama. Suddenly J Street\u2019s tally of \u201cmore than two decades\u201d is down to eight years.<\/span><\/p>\n

And anyway, since when is there a rule that every future president is obligated to take the same position as President Obama?<\/span><\/p>\n

J Street is equally mistaken in its absurd claim that \u201cvirtually the entire international community\u201d supports creating a Palestinian state. How could J Street possibly know what \u201cvirtually the entire international community\u201d thinks?<\/span><\/p>\n

There are 7.44 billion people in the world. Did J Street ask them all? How many farmers in Thailand or truck drivers in Nebraska care whether the Palestinian Arabs have a state or not?<\/span><\/p>\n

There have been two major arguments in favor of Palestinian statehood. Neither of those arguments have stood the test of time.<\/span><\/p>\n

The first was that Yasser Arafat and the Palestinian Arabs had given up their goal of destroying Israel, and had forsaken terrorism. Presumably, if they changed their ways, they could be trusted with their own state in Israel\u2019s backyard. That was the basis for the Oslo Accords in 1993. But that argument fell apart when Arafat tried to smuggle 50 tons of weapons into Gaza on the motor vessel Karine A in 2002. It turned out that the old terrorist had never changed his ways, after all.<\/span><\/p>\n

The second argument for a Palestinian state was fear of the \u201cdemographic time bomb\u201d \u2014 that because of the high Arab birthrate, Israel has to agree to a Palestinian state or become an apartheid-like ruler over the Palestinians. But then-Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin resolved that problem in 1995, when he withdrew Israel\u2019s forces from the cities where 98 percent of the Palestinians reside.<\/span><\/p>\n

For the past 22 years, these Palestinians have been residents of the Palestinian Authority \u2014 and they vote in Palestinian elections. They will never be Israeli citizens, will never vote in Israeli elections and will never threaten Israel\u2019s Jewish demographic majority.<\/span><\/p>\n

The old arguments for Palestinian statehood lie in tatters. The US government\u2019s position simply reflects that reality. J Street, unable to face reality, is trying to change history to suit its agenda. Friends of Israel need to act swiftly to counter such dangerous revisionism.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Stephen M. Flatow<\/strong>, a vice president of the Religious Zionists of America<\/strong>, is an attorney in New Jersey. He is the father of Alisa Flatow, who was murdered in an Iranian-sponsored Palestinian terrorist attack in 1995.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

J Street Rewrites History to Create \u2018Palestine\u2019 Stephen M. Flatow \/ JNS.org J Street Executive Director Jeremy Ben-Ami. Photo: J Street Facebook page. JNS.org \u2013 The US government\u2019s reluctance to demand the immediate creation of a Palestinian state has sent J Street into a panic. With its candidates having been defeated in elections on both […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[26,24],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55643"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=55643"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55643\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":55661,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55643\/revisions\/55661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=55643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=55643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=55643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}