{"id":58265,"date":"2017-12-26T17:05:02","date_gmt":"2017-12-26T15:05:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=58265"},"modified":"2017-12-23T10:23:18","modified_gmt":"2017-12-23T08:23:18","slug":"23-05-21","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=58265","title":{"rendered":"The Many Lives of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>The Many Lives of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n

WALTER LAQUEUR<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Born obscurely in turbulent times, the notorious text describing a Jewish conspiracy to enslave humanity lives on even today. Why?<\/strong><\/p>\n

From the book jacket for a French edition of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion entitled The Jewish Peril. Itzhak Genut\/alamy.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Turbulent times tend to produce turbulent voices\u2014some of them insidiously persuasive. In particular, such times offer a fertile breeding ground for peddlers of conspiracy theories. Adducing supposedly definitive evidence of hidden hands, secret cabals, and sinister machinations, they feed the suspicion that unseen forces operating in the background of events are acting to undermine settled arrangements, pervert sane policy, scramble and transform political reality in order to promote their own diabolical aims\u2014if not, indeed, to achieve total domination.<\/span><\/p>\n

Easy to dismiss as the ravings of paranoid crackpots, such theories have, in some places at some times, infected the minds of both elites and multitudes of ordinary people at every level of society. Perhaps the most notorious textbook case is The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: a pamphlet that, appearing early in the 20th century and summoning \u201cproof\u201d of a monstrous Jewish conspiracy to enslave all of humanity, would become one of the most famous and important political documents in world history.<\/span><\/p>\n

Exposed repeatedly as itself a monstrosity\u2014an outright forgery and fraud\u2014the Protocols would nevertheless enjoy the proverbial nine lives before it faded from view in the aftermath of World War II. Or did it? In some less enlightened parts of the globe, it continues to live on, circulated often by cynical governments, especially in the Middle East and Asia, anxious to deflect their own responsibility for the discontents of their restive subjects. But traces of its influence, alongside solemn asseverations of its real, actual truth, can also be found today, in our own turbulent times, among some of the unlikeliest bedfellows in the enlightened West.<\/span><\/p>\n

To approach the mystery of its longevity, let\u2019s begin by exploring its history.<\/span><\/p>\n

I. A Blueprint for World Domination<\/strong><\/p>\n

In 1903, a slim volume appeared in Russian titled The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. It was purportedly based on the report of two accidental eavesdroppers: a German scientist named Dr. Faust and a shadowy convert from Judaism named Lassalle (perhaps to be identified as the German-Jewish socialist but anti-Marxist Ferdinand Lasalle, who died in 1864).<\/span><\/p>\n

The year, we learn, is 1860, and the two men happen to overhear a speech given by an elderly rabbi at a clandestine meeting. It emerges that such secret gatherings have been held once every 100 years. At them, emissaries from each of the twelve tribes of ancient Israel discuss, refine, and perfect their strategy of Jewish world domination.<\/span><\/p>\n

In the course of this particular meeting, the delegates review 24 plans, or \u201cprotocols,\u201d in all. The occasion ends with the rabbi\u2019s speech, at whose climax the assembled conspirators proclaim that \u201cour domination will take place when all of the world\u2019s gold will be in our hands, for gold is the New Jerusalem.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

At least, that is how the standard version goes; over the years, the Protocols would appear in many editions, many versions, and many languages. Even the title would vary\u2014with, for instance, \u201cElders of Zion\u201d given as \u201cLearned Elders of Zion\u201d or \u201cSages of Zion.\u201d Indeed, although the 1903 edition appears to be the one on which subsequent versions and translations were based, each exhibiting its own degree of fidelity to the \u201coriginal,\u201d it is likely that the Protocols were first composed earlier, in the 1890s.<\/span><\/p>\n

Here, from Protocol 10, \u201cPreparing for Power,\u201d is a representative excerpt, as rendered in the 1918 English version of this \u201cblueprint for the domination of the world by a secret brotherhood\u201d (as the preface has it). The unnamed speaker, presumably the leader of the cabal, having previously traced the history of politics from earliest human times through to the age of the modern liberal state\u2014itself posited to be a vast ruse concocted by the plotters to deceive the \u201cmob\u201d and the \u201cgoyim\u201d\u2014is discoursing on where and how to proceed from here:<\/span><\/p>\n

When we introduced into the state organism the poison of liberalism, its whole political complexion underwent a change. States have been seized with a mortal illness\u2014blood-poisoning. All that remains is to await the end of their death agony.<\/span><\/p>\n

Liberalism produced constitutional States, which took the place of what was the only safeguard of the goyim, namely, despotism; and a constitution, as you well know, is nothing else but a school of discords, misunderstandings, quarrels, disagreements, fruitless party agitations, party whims\u2014in a word, a school of everything that serves to destroy the personality of state activity. . . .<\/span><\/p>\n

Then it was that the era of republics became possible of realization; and then it was that we replaced the ruler by a caricature of a government\u2014by a president, taken from the mob, from the midst of our puppet creatures, our slaves. This was the foundation of the landmine which we have laid under the goy people\u2014I should rather say, under the goy peoples. . . .<\/span><\/p>\n

In order that our scheme may produce [the desired] result, we shall arrange elections in favor of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain, some \u201cPanama\u201d or other. Then they will be trustworthy agents for the accomplishment of our plans, out of fear of revelations and from the natural desire of everyone who has attained power, namely, the retention of the privileges, advantages, and honor connected with the office of president. . . .<\/span><\/p>\n

The president will, at our discretion, interpret the sense of such of the existing laws as admit of various interpretation; he will further annul them when we indicate to him the necessity to do so; besides this, he will have the right to propose temporary laws, and even new departures in the government\u2019s constitutional working, the pretext both for the one and the other being the requirements for the supreme welfare of the state.<\/span><\/p>\n

By such measures we shall obtain the power of destroying little by little, step by step, all that at the outset, when we enter on our rights, we are compelled to introduce into the constitutions of states to prepare for the transition to an imperceptible abolition of every kind of constitution, and then the time is come to turn every form of government into our despotism.<\/span><\/p>\n

And so it proceeds, in minute detail, turgidly, relentlessly, mind-bendingly onward.<\/span><\/p>\n

Exposed repeatedly as a fraud, the Protocols became one of the most widely devoured literary products of modernity.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Clearly, all of this elaborate and sophisticated-sounding ratiocination, of whose intricacy I\u2019ve been able to convey the merest hint, is the work of an extremely fertile imagination, or more likely of several imaginations\u2014to judge by the weird shifts in tenses in even this one abbreviated passage, not to mention the sudden allusions to contemporary events like the French Panama Canal scandals of 1892-93. None of which, however, stopped the Protocols from becoming one of the most famous and most widely devoured literary products of modernity. Over the decades, it found and has continued to find avid promoters and readers all over the world, from Japan to India, from the Arab and Muslim Middle East to Europe both East and West, from Britain and the United States to Russia and beyond. It has provided scripts for radio and TV shows and movies, been serialized in newspapers (including, in 1938 in the U.S., Father Coughlin\u2019s Social Justice), adapted in spinoff publications (including Henry Ford\u2019s Americanized version, The International Jew, which appeared in installments in the 1920s), invoked as an authoritative source in political documents like the 1988 covenant of Hamas (\u201c[the Zionists\u2019] plan is embodied in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion\u201d), and distributed as textbook material throughout the Arab and Islamic world.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nowhere, of course, did the work achieve greater popularity or attract more devoted fans than in early 20th-century Germany, being cited as an authentic source by Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf and by the Nazi publicist Alfred Rosenberg in a book explaining \u201cJewish world policy.\u201d Once the Nazi party came to power in 1933, it was reprinted and disseminated in multiple editions and in millions of copies during the years leading up to World War II.<\/span><\/p>\n

II. Theories of Authorship<\/strong><\/p>\n

At the hands of an army of scholars, government commissions, and investigative journalists, the Protocols\u2019 inauthenticity has been demonstrated many times over. But what do we know about how it came into being? In fact, its authorship, even today, remains a mystery, with new revelations or at least new theories seeming to surface every ten years or so.<\/span><\/p>\n

One lifelong scholar of the Protocols and related works is the German historian Michael Hagemeister, who has just edited and published a huge new collection of documents under the title Die \u201cProtokolle der Weisen von Zion\u201d vor Gericht (\u201cThe Protocols of the Elders of Zion before the Court\u201d). The book deals with trials that took place in Berne, Switzerland between 1933 and 1936 as a result of legal action brought by local Jewish communities against the publisher of the work\u2019s Swiss edition. In addition to the text of the proceedings themselves\u2014the lawsuit was based on the contention that publication of the Protocols violated a constitutional ban on incitement to hatred\u2014the volume includes a variety of other relevant documents as well as extensive annotations, commentaries, and a long introduction by Hagemeister himself.<\/span><\/p>\n

The particulars of the Berne trials need not detain us. Suffice it to note that, where the authorship of the Protocols is concerned, neither the vastly learned Hagemeister nor any other investigator has reached a satisfying conclusion, though a number of perennial candidates have been ruled out. Thus, a Russian named Sergei Nilus was probably the editor of the 1905 edition, and possibly of the 1903 original as well. But, despite the persistent claims of some, he could not have been the author. Even the conflicting accounts of his life\u2014a priest, a professor, a man with three wives, a rival to Rasputin\u2014have been shown by Hagemeister to be fantastical.<\/span><\/p>\n

A similar story can be told about Pyotr Rachkovsky (d. 1910), the head of foreign operations for the Okhrana, the tsarist secret police, and later head of the entire force, whom many historians have named as the author. In one accepted view, he commissioned the Protocols\u2019 creation and enlisted Nilus, or the right-wing journalist Matvei Golovinskii, or some otherwise unknown person, to produce the forgery. But here, too, Hagemeister and others have shown that the evidence for Rachkovsky\u2019s involvement is flimsy at best, and for Golovinskii\u2019s even weaker.<\/span><\/p>\n

Rachkovsky is also reputed to have commissioned the faking of a letter by the revolutionary Georgy Plekhanov, who was Lenin\u2019s predecessor as head of the Russian Social Democratic party. According to the letter, another left-wing Russian leader had been secretly collaborating with Britain\u2019s intelligence service. Like much of what the Okhrana did, this supposed product of Rachkovsky\u2019s pen would have been intended to discredit socialists and sow dissent in their ranks.<\/span><\/p>\n

With that in mind, is it not tempting to speculate that, if not Rachkovsky himself, elements of the tsarist regime might also have produced the Protocols as a way of harnessing anti-Semitism as a political weapon? After all, there can be little doubt that, as the above excerpt suggests, whoever did compose the work intended to discredit liberalism, in even its most moderate forms, as a Jewish plot. Yet this does not necessarily mean that the Okhrana had a role in producing it, and even if such a role were definitively determined, we would still be left with only speculation as to its primary motive. Needless to add, such speculation exists in abundance, most of it tying the forgery to high-level power struggles within the Russian government.<\/span><\/p>\n

The contents of the Protocols<\/em> invite conflicting theories about its origins, but we\u2019ll probably never know who wrote it.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The truth is that the contents of the Protocols themselves invite conflicting theories about their origins. After all, the work purports to contain a super-secret document that, having been obtained by a person or group at an unknown date, has felicitously fallen into the hands of an editor. One version states that the Protocols originally existed in oral rather than written form. Another claims the document had its origins in Solomon\u2019s Temple, built 3,000 years ago, when the original cabal, then known as the Sanhedrin\u2014a term that in reality didn\u2019t come into use until much later than the destruction of Solomon\u2019s Temple\u2014first met; it was only in the second half of the 19th century that one or more persons are said to have successfully eavesdropped on the centennial meeting in Prague and were then able to deliver a report to the publisher.<\/span><\/p>\n

Even the 1918 English translation poses a puzzle. The London Morning Post, which published it in nineteen installments, attributed the translation to one Victor Marsden, allegedly a British citizen working for a firm that operated in Russia. Unfortunately, it is entirely possible that he, too, is a fictional character.<\/span><\/p>\n

There is a lesson in all of these dead ends. Many years ago, having joined the long list of investigators into the source and authorship of the Protocols, I had a conversation with the late Norman Cohn, whose 1967 Warrant for Genocide<\/em> remains the chief scholarly study of the subject, or at least did until Hagemeister\u2019s more recent efforts to supersede it. After a morning spent in the basement archives of the institute in London that I headed at the time, Cohn emerged to issue a dire warning: \u201cWalter, beware: preoccupation with this kind of idiotic paranoia\u2014it\u2019s infectious.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

At the time I made light of his friendly advice. But within a few years I began to realize that not only was this document a paranoid conspiratorial undertaking in itself but so, too, was the search for the fabricators. There is a real danger of investing too much time and mental energy to achieve certainty where true, total certainty is unobtainable. Even in the best of cases, history is not an exact science. Where the Protocols in particular are concerned, it is certain that they are a forgery, but we shall probably never know who wrote them. A forgery can succeed only if the identity of its author or authors is kept hidden, and those behind the book\u2019s lies sought above all to conceal their identities\u2014and succeeded. If they were affiliated with the Okhrana, they were true professionals.<\/span><\/p>\n

Inquiries into the authorship of the Protocols<\/em> are thus bound to disappoint\u2014but that doesn\u2019t mean there\u2019s nothing to be learned about its origins. A more fruitful angle by which to approach this issue may be that of literary history. In other words, instead of asking about the work\u2019s direct authorship, ask about its background: what do we know about the social and especially the literary context in which it took root?<\/span><\/p>\n

III. Enter Hermann Goedsche<\/strong><\/p>\n

In the 19th century, a new genre appeared in European literature: the political-conspiracy novel. Rapidly gaining popularity, it influenced other literary forms as well. Its precursors were the works of the French writers Eug\u00e8ne Sue\u2014author of the then-wildly popular The Mysteries of Paris<\/em>\u2014and the much better remembered Alexandre Dumas, whose many novels include The Count of Monte Cristo and The Three Musketeers<\/em>, both originally published in serial form, as well as The Queen\u2019s Necklace<\/em> and other favorites.<\/span><\/p>\n

An early pioneer of the conspiracy novel, and of the historical-political novel more broadly, was Hermann Goedsche (1815-1878). He might even be considered the genre\u2019s founder. A native of Silesia and a man of strong right-wing convictions, he wrote under several different pen-names and was also active as a provocateur in the pay of the Prussian police. In his journalistic career, he contributed to the same far-right wing publications as did Otto von Bismarck. Once he even participated in a Rachkovsy-esque forgery.<\/span><\/p>\n

In one chapter of his 1868 novel Biarritz<\/em>\u2014published under the pseudonym Sir John Retcliffe\u2014Goedsche describes the meeting of a secret rabbinic cabal very much like the one described in the Protocols. As in many versions of the latter work, the gathering takes place in the Jewish cemetery in Prague. The climax of the scene is the speech in which the rabbi who has chaired the meeting outlines the methods to be used in the quest for world domination: to acquire as much real estate as possible, to transform craftsmen and artisans into industrial workers, to infiltrate fellow Jews into high finance and public office, to spread democracy and undermine the social order, to seize control of the media in order to manipulate the mob, and, ultimately, to elevate the president of the Council of World Jewry to the position of ruler of the world.<\/span><\/p>\n

The parallels with every known edition of the Protocols,<\/em> parallels not just of content but of language, are too many to ignore; a number are on display in the brief excerpt I presented earlier.<\/span><\/p>\n

Although prototypes of the Protocols floated around Europe for decades, none of them would ever enjoy its mass appeal.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

This isn\u2019t to say, however, that the story of the Protocols starts with Goedsche. The rabbi\u2019s speech, as many have pointed out, bears an overwhelming resemblance to a scene from an 1864 novel by the French author Maurice Joly imagining a dialogue in hell between the philosophers Niccol\u00f2 Machiavelli and Montesquieu. Ironically, Joly\u2019s novel was not anti-Semitic at all but, rather, a satirical attack on Napoleon III by a defender of liberalism (i.e., Joly) against authoritarianism.<\/span><\/p>\n

There\u2019s little doubt that Goedsche lifted the passage directly from Joly: he was a devoted reader of French literature and an avid plagiarizer. In fact, he baldly borrowed from Dumas\u2019s The Queen\u2019s Necklace for an earlier part of the same chapter in Biarritz.<\/span><\/p>\n

But from there the plot thickens. In 1872, four years after the publication of Biarritz, the rabbi\u2019s speech was published in Russia as a stand-alone pamphlet. But now, unlike Biarritz, which never purported to be anything other than a work of fiction, the pamphlet claimed the speech was authentic. Versions of it then appeared later in Paris and Prague and, in 1887, in Germany.<\/span><\/p>\n

When the historical veracity of the Protocols was still considered a legitimate question, its defenders often pointed, however absurdly, to the rabbi\u2019s speech as evidence. The likelier scenario is that one of the several stand-alone pamphlets taken from Goedsche\u2019s work was transmuted into the earliest version of the Protocols. Who wrote that first version, and what were the intermediate steps between it and the Protocols we know today, are, to repeat once more, questions unlikely ever to be answered.<\/span><\/p>\n

For our purposes, in any case, the salient point is that although prototypes of the Protocols floated around Europe, none of them enjoyed or would ever enjoy the Protocols\u2019 mass appeal. Why not?<\/span><\/p>\n

IV. Timing Is All<\/strong><\/p>\n

In addressing that question, it\u2019s worth comparing Goedsche with another 19th-century German author of popular fiction who was likewise fond of pseudonyms and plagiarism. This was Karl May (1842-1912), who also happened to be a devoted reader of Goedsche, modeling his Die Juweleninsel (\u201cThe Isle of Jewels\u201d) on the former\u2019s Nena Sahib.<\/span><\/p>\n

read more:<\/span> The Many Lives of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The author is grateful to Harry Hoshovsky for his invaluable help in researching and writing the present article.<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Walter Laqueur is the author of, among other books, Weimar, A History of Terrorism, Fascism: Past, Present, Future, and The Dream that Failed: Reflections on the Soviet Union. His newest book, Putinism: Russia and Its Future with the West, was released in 2015 by Thomas Dunne\/St. Martin\u2019s.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Many Lives of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” WALTER LAQUEUR Born obscurely in turbulent times, the notorious text describing a Jewish conspiracy to enslave humanity lives on even today. Why? From the book jacket for a French edition of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion entitled The Jewish Peril. Itzhak Genut\/alamy. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[26,24],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58265"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=58265"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58265\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58288,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58265\/revisions\/58288"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=58265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=58265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=58265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}