{"id":68031,"date":"2019-03-03T17:00:07","date_gmt":"2019-03-03T15:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=68031"},"modified":"2019-02-23T10:10:00","modified_gmt":"2019-02-23T08:10:00","slug":"03-00-40","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=68031","title":{"rendered":"ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE J STREET"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE J STREET<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n

JONATHAN (YONI) MICHANIE<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Hoping to be identified as the \u201cmiddle-ground,” J Street characterizes itself as the home of the \u201cpro-Israel and pro-peace Americans.\u201d But its inconsistent stances reflect only uncertainty.
\n<\/strong>
\nA Star of David on a man’s kippa. (photo credit: REUTERS)<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

Since the 1937 Peel Commission, 16 peace offers have been made to the Palestinian leadership \u2013 and all have been rejected, most without a counteroffer. While the conflict itself is not short of historical complexities that have made the discussion of concessions difficult for both parties, those complexities have nonetheless always been objective.<\/span><\/p>\n

Settlements were never the sole obstacle to peace, Israel was not responsible for the unfortunate creation of Palestinian refugees, and the Palestinian leadership has been a principal oppressor of the Palestinian people. While the suffering on both sides cannot be empirically compared or objectively measured, the history that created such complexities is not up for debate or interpretation.<\/span>
\nBut a significant problem at the table of negotiations has consistently persisted on behalf of the Palestinian leadership, a lack of clarity and a distorted approach to history which have led to the contemporary realities that predominate the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.<\/span><\/p>\n

The tactics employed by J Street, which are reliant on spreading uncertainty, represent this very same failed approach. This is not only leading to the further divide within the American Jewish community, but to the harming of productive conversations about the conflict.<\/span><\/p>\n

Following the indisputably antisemitic remark by US Congressional Rep. Ilhan Omar, where she accused Jews of using their financial influence through AIPAC to safeguard American support for the Israeli government, J Street published a disturbing statement titled \u201cWeaponization and Oversimplification of the Israel Debate Must End.\u201d The content of the statement, which essentially condemned antisemitic remarks by US policy-makers while calling for nuance when discussing the conflict, was not as concerning as the timing of its publication. Using this statement to respond to Ilhan Omar\u2019s notorious antisemitic trope, J Street aimed at creating more chaos and division at a time when the American Jewish community aches for unity.<\/span><\/p>\n

However, following the organization\u2019s statement after Airbnb\u2019s discriminatory decision to boycott Jewish settlements in the West Bank, should we be surprised? The comments condemned criticism of Airbnb\u2019s decision, claiming the occupation must be protested without truly addressing the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement or its ideology.<\/span><\/p>\n

While rejecting global BDS (in reference to practice within Israel\u2019s Green Line), J Street failed to condemn Airbnb\u2019s clear double standard by singling out Jews in the West Bank. After all, Russia\u2019s Crimea and Morocco\u2019s Western Sahara were never targeted for the same accusations. Lack of clarity is J Street\u2019s strategic approach to dividing the Jewish community in the US under the guise of progressive attitudes toward peace.<\/span><\/p>\n

In an interview with foreign policy analyst Joshua Keating, J Street president Jeremy Ben Ami responded to Omar\u2019s comments as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s the entirety of the argument that is overblown. What we\u2019re losing sight of is the actual issues that we should be discussing. We\u2019re debating whether a particular tweet or expression is antisemitic. The issues I would like to see a focus on are the occupation, the settlements and the question of whether we can end this conflict.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

IF THE leadership of the organization itself is unable to call out transparent antisemitism, how are they to be given any sort of legitimacy to address a conflict, which at its core is rooted in the refusal to recognize Israel as the rightful home of the Jewish people? While legitimate and proportional criticism of Israel should exist, J Street\u2019s aim at nuancing antisemitism is unacceptable. Since the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1995, the Palestinian leadership has consistently violated the agreement by refusing to tear down its systematic indoctrination of antisemitism in the disputed territories.<\/span><\/p>\n

The same lack of clarity, which has perpetuated the conflict and the consequential suffering that followed, serves as the same contributing factor to the rise of antisemitism in the United States. J Street\u2019s audacity to label its national organization as \u201cunequivocally Zionist,\u201d while accepting Airbnb\u2019s decision to boycott Jewish settlements in the West Bank \u2013 or by seeming to be incapable of releasing a comment solely dedicated to condemning antisemitic language in the US Congress \u2013 is nothing short of the same lack of clarity guiding the Palestinian Authority\u2019s rejectionist policies.<\/span><\/p>\n

Hoping to be identified as the \u201cmiddle-ground\u201d between both sides of the conflict, J Street characterizes itself as the home of the \u201cpro-Israel and pro-peace Americans.\u201d But its inconsistent stances reflect only uncertainty.<\/span><\/p>\n

It is evident that the American Israel Council for Public Affairs (AIPAC) stands for bipartisan support of the American-Israeli relationship \u2013 one based not only on Zionist principles but on shared values and interests between both nations. And we know that Students for Justice in Palestine advocates for ethnic cleansing. It is just as transparent that American Muslims for Palestine serves as the megaphone for Hamas\u2019s terrorist network in the US, and that Jewish Voice for Peace seeks to eliminate the Jewish character of Israel by supporting the claim to the full right of return for 5.2 million Palestinians (the large majority of whom have never set foot in Israel).<\/span><\/p>\n

Whether Zionist or anti-Zionist, these organizations are at least transparent enough to be characterized not for the loss of Israel\u2019s Jewish nature, but occasionally for being incapable of condemning organizations which condone Palestinian terrorism and violence. With several more of these inconsistencies, how exactly does J Street seek to be perceived? This uncertainty is cause for concern.<\/span><\/p>\n

J Street has not just become a divisive factor for the Jewish community in America, it has also become an obstacle to productive discourse and possible reconciliation among the millions waiting for peace to be made. Distorting facts, revising history and disguising a policy of obscurity as neutrality has not only eliminated the organization\u2019s claim to \u201cseek a peaceful two-state solution,\u201d but has also prolonged the harmful lack of clarity that plagues meaningful talks between prominent sectors of the American Jewish community.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

The writer is a former IDF paratrooper, and an Israel advocate, public speaker, Middle East analyst, and campus coordinator for the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA). He has a master\u2019s degree in diplomacy and international security from IDC Herzliya<\/em><\/span>.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Zawarto\u015b\u0107 publikowanych artyku\u0142\u00f3w i materia\u0142\u00f3w nie reprezentuje pogl\u0105d\u00f3w ani opinii Reunion’68,<\/em>
\nani te\u017c webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyra\u017anie zaznaczone.
\nTwoje uwagi, linki, w\u0142asne artyku\u0142y lub wiadomo\u015bci prze\u015blij na adres:
\n<\/em>webmaster@reunion68.com<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE J STREET JONATHAN (YONI) MICHANIE Hoping to be identified as the \u201cmiddle-ground,” J Street characterizes itself as the home of the \u201cpro-Israel and pro-peace Americans.\u201d But its inconsistent stances reflect only uncertainty. A Star of David on a man’s kippa. (photo credit: REUTERS) Since the 1937 Peel Commission, 16 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[26,24],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68031"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=68031"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68031\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":68053,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68031\/revisions\/68053"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=68031"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=68031"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=68031"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}