{"id":82802,"date":"2020-12-19T17:05:14","date_gmt":"2020-12-19T15:05:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=82802"},"modified":"2020-12-18T18:46:07","modified_gmt":"2020-12-18T16:46:07","slug":"25-05-53","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=82802","title":{"rendered":"John Brennan disputes Israel\u2019s right to defend itself. There\u2019s a word for that."},"content":{"rendered":"<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.timesofisrael.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"center alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/www.reunion68.com\/Biuletyn\/img\/times.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"35%\"><\/a><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000080;\"><strong><a style=\"color: #000080; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.timesofisrael.com\/john-brennan-disputes-israels-right-to-defend-itself-theres-a-word-for-that\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">John Brennan disputes Israel\u2019s right to defend itself. There\u2019s a word for that.<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Dr. Martin Sherman<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<hr style=\"height: 15px; background: #d0e6fa; width: 100%;\">\n<h4 style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>The former CIA director who drew up the US &#8216;kill list&#8217; criticizing the assassination of Iran&#8217;s Fakhridazeh? You&#8217;ve got to be kidding.<\/em><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/static.timesofisrael.com\/blogs\/uploads\/2020\/12\/AP_17143519984484-e1534428313875-640x400.jpg\" width=\"100%\"><span style=\"color: #808080;\"><em>Former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, May 23, 2017, before the House Intelligence Committee Russia Investigation Task Force (AP Photo\/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">It has been over a week since the lynchpin of the Iranian nuclear project, Mohsen Fakhridazeh, was killed in what appears to be an immaculately planned and flawlessly executed strike by elusive and yet to be identified assailants. Nonetheless, analysis of what took place and speculation of what might take place as a result, are still at the focus of considerable media attention.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">The prime suspect?<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">While no state or organization has claimed responsibility\/credit for the action, and despite the fact that a good number of interested parties had reason to approve of his sudden demise, suspicion fell chiefly on the secret intelligence service of Israel, the Mossad.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Depressingly, but not unexpectedly, international condemnation was both swift and widespread.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Thus, the EU\u2019s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, issued a disapproving statement, calling the killing \u201ca criminal act [that] runs counter to the principle of respect for human rights the EU stands for.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">In similar critical vein, Britain\u2019s Foreign Secretary, Dominic Raab expressed concern over \u201cthe situation in Iran and the wider region [where] we do want to see de-escalation of tensions.\u201d Although he admitted that \u201cWe\u2019re still waiting to see the full facts\u2026of what\u2019s happened in Iran,\u201d he nevertheless stressed the need to \u201cstick to the rule of international humanitarian law which is very clear against targeting civilians.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Significantly, as Ron Jontof-Hutter deftly points out, both Borrell and Raab seem either woefully misinformed or willfully misleading in describing Fakhrizadeh as a \u201ccivilian\/official.\u201d After all, it is widely known that he was a brigadier general in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, not only an elite and highly privileged arm of Iran\u2019s military, but also designated a terrorist organization by the US in April 2019.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4><strong>Hostile &amp; hypocritical?<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">But perhaps the most alarming and annoying reaction came from John Brennan, who served as the Director of the CIA under the Obama administration (2013-17). In a series of tweets immediately after the attack, Brennan decried the killing of Fakhrizadeh in the strongest of terms.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Although professing not to know the identity of the assailants or whether \u201ca foreign government\u201d was behind the murder of Fakhrizadeh, he nevertheless began by deeming the attack an \u201cact of state-sponsored terrorism\u201d and \u201ca flagrant violation of international law,\u201d which was likely to \u201cencourage more governments to carry out lethal attacks against foreign officials.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\" style=\"text-align: left;\">I do not know whether a foreign government authorized or carried out the the murder of Fakhrizadeh. Such an act of state-sponsored terrorism would be a flagrant violation of international law &amp; encourage more governments to carry out lethal attacks against foreign officials.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\u2014 John O. Brennan (@JohnBrennan) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/JohnBrennan\/status\/1332400793559949312?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">November 27, 2020<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><script async=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">He went on to characterize the action as \u201c\u2026a criminal act &amp; highly reckless\u201d, warning that: \u201cIt risks lethal retaliation &amp; a new round of regional conflict\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">When operating in foreign countries, secret intelligence forces are ipso facto in contravention of the law of the land in which they operate. Indeed, as part of their job description, they may abduct, extort, illegally acquire classified information and, yes, assassinate individuals deemed a grave threat to their homeland.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">This is, of course, something that Brennan is well aware of \u2013 since he was, as the New York Times dubbed him: \u201cthe chief architect of a clandestine campaign of targeted killings,\u201d and \u201cthe principal coordinator of a \u2018kill list\u2019\u2026 overseeing drone strikes by the military and the C.I.A.\u201d\u2014see here and here.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Good for the goose but not for the gander?<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000080;\">Indeed, the Brennan-orchestrated campaign spanned large swathes of the globe\u2014including Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen, comprising around an estimated 14,000 strikes. Of course, unlike the targeted killing of Fakhrizadeh, which resulted in little to no collateral damage, the US drone strike caused significant civilian casualties, with estimates ranging from just under 1,000 to just over 2,000 fatalities, including hundreds of children \u2013 and leaving thousands injured.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">In fact, according to one BBC report, local residents stated that they were more afraid of the US drones than they were of the terrorists, who the drones targeted (also see here). Indeed, Amnesty International designated the US extrajudicial killings as unlawful \u2013 some of which might even be considered war crimes. Moreover, as for the efficacy of the drone campaign, many see the collateral damage wrought on civilians as spurring recruitment to the very terrorist groups it was designed to curtail.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Indeed, Brennan has been harshly berated by human rights organizations\u2014much along the lines that he himself castigated the strike against Fakhrizadeh; while his integrity in accounting for the results of the drone campaign, has been gravely impugned. For example, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism asserted that Brennan\u2019s claims regarding civilian casualties \u201c do not appear to bear scrutiny\u201d; while The Atlantic was even more brusque, alleging reproachfully: \u201cBrennan has been willing to lie about those drone strikes to hide ugly realities\u201d. It derisively designated his assertion that: \u201cthere had been zero collateral deaths from covert U.S. drone strikes in the previous year, an absurd claim that has been decisively debunked.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">\u2018Extraordinary &amp; galling\u2026\u2019<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000080;\">Following his previously cited derogatory tweets, Brennan tried to differentiate his drone campaign from the targeted killing of Fakhrizadeh. Accordingly, he tweeted:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">These assassinations are far different than strikes against terrorist leaders &amp; operatives of groups like al-Qaida &amp; Islamic State, which are not sovereign states. As illegitimate combatants under international law, they can be targeted in order to stop deadly terrorist attacks.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">So, according to \u201cBrennenesque logic,\u201d preemptively blowing away a \u201cbad guy\u201d(together with several unfortunate collateral bystanders), who was allegedly plotting to slay several hundred is completely justified, but eliminating a high ranking military figure (with zero collateral casualties), who was unquestionably planning the destruction of several million is a heinous \u201cact of state sponsored terrorism\u201d and \u201ca flagrant violation of international law.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">It was with good reason that General (ret.) John \u201cJack\u201d Keane, former Vice Chief of Staff of the United States Army, took exception to Brennan\u2019s remarks.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">In a Fox News interview, he remarked tersely: \u201c\u2026that\u2019s pretty extraordinary. It takes a lot of gall to say something like that in the face of what Israel is dealing with, with Iran.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">He went on to clarify:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">I mean Iran is a threat to the United States. They\u2019ve proven it. They\u2019ve blown up our embassies they\u2019ve killed our soldiers in Iraq. They\u2019ve killed thousands of us in the [last] forty years. But they are not an existential threat\u2026 They are not challenging the survival of the United States. Nuclear weapons in their hands with ballistic missiles and the continuous and repeated threat to destroy the State of Israel. Iran is an existential threat to the survival of Israel\u2026that is why their actions are so different than ours.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">\u201cArrogant &amp; Dismissive\u2026\u201d<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000080;\">With some surprise and disapproval, Keane added: \u201cI\u2019m stunned that a former CIA director would not recognize this level of intensity and determination for what it really is \u2013 it is to protect the security of the Israeli people.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Elsewhere, Keane robustly disputed Brennan\u2019s earlier tweets: \u201cI\u2019ll take issue with \u2026 those statements\u2026 It\u2019s the arrogance that comes out of America at times when we are so dismissive of what our allies are really dealing with\u2026what they deal with every single day in terms of a threat. So here we have the Iranians, that for every single year for 40 years have stated that they want to destroy the State of Israel and they want nuclear weapons and missiles to deliver them as the means. And they talk openly about it. But we\u2019re just dismissing that. We\u2019re not going to take it seriously. The Israelis shouldn\u2019t be doing anything that could potentially lead to a \u201clethal reaction\u2019. \u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">So, it seems that it is not that Israel\u2019s detractors do not recognize that states have a right to undertake actions that Israel has undertaken. It is just that they feel that Israel should be denied that right!<\/span><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>If it walks like a duck\u2026<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">But surely if Jews as individuals or as a collective are denied the rights recognized for others, if individual Jews are denied the right to personal safety, and if the Jewish collective is denied the right to provide itself security \u2013 is that not blatant Judeophobic discrimination?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000080;\">If there is call for a unique and prejudicial standard to be applied to Jews alone, both as individuals and as a collective, then there is little choice but to conclude that what we are witnessing is not mere hypocrisy, but blatant anti-Semitism \u2013 little more than an expectation the Jews should in fact consent to die meekly.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000080;\">It should be exposed as such and treated accordingly.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><em><span style=\"color: #808080;\"><strong>Dr. Martin Sherman<\/strong> is founder and executive director of the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies. He served in operational capacities in the Israeli Defense establishment. for seven years, and was a ministerial adviser to Yitzhak Shamir&#8217;s government. Sherman also lectured for 20 years at Tel Aviv University in Political Science, International Relations and Strategic Studies. He holds several university degrees: a B.Sc. (Physics and Geology), an MBA (Finance), and a PhD in political science and international relations. He was the first academic director of the internationally renowned Herzliya Conference and is the author of two books and numerous articles and policy papers on a wide range of political, diplomatic and security issues. Sherman was born in South Africa and has lived in Israel since 1971.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<hr style=\"height: 15px; background: #d0e6fa; width: 100%;\">\n<div id=\"content\" class=\"content-alignment\">\n<div id=\"watch-description\" class=\"yt-uix-button-panel\">\n<div id=\"watch-description-text\" style=\"text-align: center;\">\n<p><em>Zawarto\u015b\u0107 publikowanych artyku\u0142\u00f3w i materia\u0142\u00f3w nie reprezentuje pogl\u0105d\u00f3w ani opinii Reunion&#8217;68,<\/em><em><br \/>\nani te\u017c webmastera Blogu Reunion&#8217;68, chyba ze jest to wyra\u017anie zaznaczone.<br \/>\nTwoje uwagi, linki, w\u0142asne artyku\u0142y lub wiadomo\u015bci prze\u015blij na adres:<br \/>\n<\/em><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong><em><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"mailto:webmaster@reunion68.com\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">webmaster@reunion68.com<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr style=\"width: 100%;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>John Brennan disputes Israel\u2019s right to defend itself. There\u2019s a word for that. Dr. Martin Sherman The former CIA director who drew up the US &#8216;kill list&#8217; criticizing the assassination of Iran&#8217;s Fakhridazeh? You&#8217;ve got to be kidding. Former CIA Director John Brennan testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, May 23, 2017, before the House [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[26,24],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82802"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=82802"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82802\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":82811,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82802\/revisions\/82811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=82802"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=82802"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=82802"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}