{"id":91209,"date":"2021-11-29T17:05:48","date_gmt":"2021-11-29T15:05:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=91209"},"modified":"2021-11-29T08:03:03","modified_gmt":"2021-11-29T06:03:03","slug":"03-00-72","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=91209","title":{"rendered":"New York Times Stealth-Corrects Claim that Jesus \u2018Is Known in the Old Testament\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>New York Times Stealth-Corrects Claim that Jesus \u2018Is Known in the Old Testament\u2019<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/h5>\n

Ira Stoll<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n

The headquarters of The New York Times. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

The New York Times<\/em> devotes most of three broadsheet pages in Sunday\u2019s paper \u2014 the SundayStyles front and two pages inside that section \u2014 to an article about a California-based \u201cspiritual adviser\u201d named Carissa Shumacher.<\/span><\/p>\n

The print New York Times<\/em> reports, \u201cIn late 2019, just as the world was on the precipice of a plague of biblical proportions, Ms. Schumacher said she began channeling Yeshua, or Jesus Christ as he is known in the Old Testament.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The writing here is so imprecise that the meaning is hard to parse. The modifying phrase \u201cin late 2019\u201d is placed in the sentence so that a reader can\u2019t tell what happened in late 2019, the interview (\u201csaid\u201d) or the \u201cchanneling\u201d or the being on the precipice (\u201cwas\u201d) or some combination thereof. It\u2019s also unclear whether the explanation of Yeshua as \u201cJesus Christ as he is known in the Old Testament\u201d is something that Schumacher said, or something that the Times<\/em> is adding in on its own to help readers understand.<\/span><\/p>\n

Such sloppy placement of modifying phrases is, alas, a recurring problem at the paper. The newspaper did it the other day with the modifying phrase \u201cwith an automatic gun<\/a>,\u201d leaving it unclear to readers whether the person \u201cwith an automatic gun\u201d was an Israeli tour guide or a Palestinian assailant.<\/span><\/p>\n

The main New York Times Twitter account, @nytimes, which has 51 million followers, tweeted<\/a> out the article with a version of that sentence: \u201cThe spiritual adviser Carissa Schumacher channels the dead for a celebrity clientele that includes Jennifer Aniston and Rooney Mara. In late 2019, she said she began channeling Yeshua, or Jesus as he is known in the Old Testament.\u201d That tweet has not been deleted or corrected, at this writing.<\/span><\/p>\n

Imprecise English grammar aside, the claim that Jesus, or Jesus Christ, \u201cis known\u201d in the \u201cOld Testament\u201d \u2014 a Christian version of and term for what Jews know as the Hebrew Bible or Tanakh <\/em>\u2014 is troubling for Jewish readers. Christians claim that Jesus is foreshadowed in the Hebrew Bible, but Jews do not believe that. It\u2019s one thing for Schumacher to make that claim, but the language could easily allow a reader to think the Times<\/em> is endorsing that Christian reading.<\/span><\/p>\n

In the online version of the article, the sentence has been altered, or \u201cstealth-edited,\u201d so that it now reads, \u201cIn late 2019, just as the world was on the precipice of a plague of biblical proportions, Ms. Schumacher said she began channeling Yeshua, a.k.a. Jesus Christ.\u201d There is no correction appended to the online article as of this writing.<\/span><\/p>\n

I emailed the author of the Times<\/em> article, Irina Aleksander, to ask her what had happened, whether there\u2019d be a correction, and why the article changed between print and online. She didn\u2019t immediately respond to my query.<\/span><\/p>\n

Some Times<\/em> readers called the newspaper out on the mistake. \u201cThere is no mention of Jesus in the Hebrew Bible whether called Yeshua or anything else,\u201d one reader tweeted. \u201cJesus is not present in the Tanakh<\/em>,\u201d another reader tweeted.<\/span><\/p>\n

In an ideal world, or even in a semi-competent world, the Times<\/em> would have editors knowledgeable enough about Judaism and the Bible to read articles like this and to catch and correct the mistakes before publication. The Times<\/em>, however, has perhaps concluded that employing such editors is too expensive, and that it can make more money by putting sloppy, offensive, or inaccurate articles out on the internet and fixing them post-publication if necessary \u2014 letting readers on Twitter do the work that used to be done by skilled editors.<\/span><\/p>\n

Such an approach has worked out okay so far for the Ochs-Sulzberger family that inherited the newspaper and controls it through a family trust that maintains control of the company through a special class of shares \u2014 they still own the paper, and plenty of family members (unlike the skilled editors) still have high-paying jobs there<\/a>. But there\u2019s a damage inflicted on the broader culture by publishing sentences like that, muddying what the Bible says and giving readers a bad example of how to write clear English. It\u2019s as if the Times<\/em> were some industrial polluter, reaping profits while spewing poison into a nearby stream. Perhaps the current Times<\/em> management can ask Shumacher to channel the spirits of Carr Van Anda, Theodore Menline Bernstein, or Allan M. Siegal to advise on the concept and value of pre-publication editing.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Ira Stoll was managing editor of The Forward and North American editor of The Jerusalem Post. His media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found <\/strong><\/span><\/em>here<\/a>.<\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

Zawarto\u015b\u0107 publikowanych artyku\u0142\u00f3w i materia\u0142\u00f3w nie reprezentuje pogl\u0105d\u00f3w ani opinii Reunion’68,<\/em>
\nani te\u017c webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyra\u017anie zaznaczone.
\nTwoje uwagi, linki, w\u0142asne artyku\u0142y lub wiadomo\u015bci prze\u015blij na adres:
\n<\/em>webmaster@reunion68.com<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

New York Times Stealth-Corrects Claim that Jesus \u2018Is Known in the Old Testament\u2019 Ira Stoll The headquarters of The New York Times. Photo: Wikimedia Commons. The New York Times devotes most of three broadsheet pages in Sunday\u2019s paper \u2014 the SundayStyles front and two pages inside that section \u2014 to an article about a California-based \u201cspiritual adviser\u201d […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[26,24],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91209"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=91209"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91209\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":91228,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91209\/revisions\/91228"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=91209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=91209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=91209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}