{"id":94780,"date":"2022-05-05T17:00:55","date_gmt":"2022-05-05T15:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=94780"},"modified":"2022-05-03T06:14:32","modified_gmt":"2022-05-03T04:14:32","slug":"02-00-74","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/?p=94780","title":{"rendered":"US Supreme Court Unanimously Sides With Jewish Family Who Owned Pissarro Painting Taken by Nazis"},"content":{"rendered":"<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.algemeiner.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"center alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/www.reunion68.com\/Biuletyn\/img\/algem.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"35%\"><\/a><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #000080;\"><span><strong><a style=\"color: #000080; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.algemeiner.com\/2022\/04\/21\/us-supreme-court-unanimously-sides-with-jewish-family-who-owned-pissarro-painting-taken-by-nazis\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">US Supreme Court Unanimously Sides With Jewish Family Who Owned Pissarro Painting Taken by Nazis<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/h5>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Shiryn Ghermezian<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<hr style=\"height: 15px; background: #d0e6fa; width: 100%;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/www.algemeiner.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Camille_Pissarro_-_Rue_Saint-Honor%C3%A9_dans_lapr%C3%A8s-midi._Effet_de_pluie.jpg\" width=\"100%\"><span style=\"color: #808080;\"><em>Detail of the painting \u201cRue Saint-Honor\u00e9 in the Afternoon. Effect of Rain\u201d by Camille Pissarro. Photo: public domain<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p id=\"id__oolo1apuup\" class=\"css-901oao r-18jsvk2 r-37j5jr r-1blvdjr r-16dba41 r-vrz42v r-bcqeeo r-bnwqim r-qvutc0\" dir=\"auto\" lang=\"en\" style=\"text-align: left;\"><span class=\"css-901oao css-16my406 r-poiln3 r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0\" style=\"color: #000080;\">In an unanimous ruling on Thursday, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the heirs of a German Jewish family who hope to reclaim artwork by Impressionist painter Camille Pissarro that was taken by the Nazis during World War II and is now on display at a museum in Spain.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">According to court documents, \u201cRue Saint-Honor\u00e9 in the Afternoon. Effect of Rain\u201d was originally sold by Pissarro\u2019s agent in 1900 to Paul Cassirer, whose prominent German Jewish family owned an art gallery and publishing house in Germany. Lilly Cassirer inherited the painting, but surrendered the artwork in 1939 to the Nazis in return for an exit visa to flee Germany and travel to England, where her grandson, Claude Cassirer, had relocated.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">The grandmother and grandson eventually moved to the United States and, despite their efforts, were unable to track down the painting that once hung on the wall of Lilly\u2019s apartment in Berlin, as shown in a photograph submitted to the court. Claude \u2014 Lilly\u2019s sole heir after she died \u2014&nbsp; discovered in 1999 that the painting of a Paris streetscape had been purchased by the Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, which was created and controlled by the Kingdom of Spain, and put on display at the Thyssen-Bornemisza National Museum in Madrid.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Cassirer sued the Foundation for ownership and a return of the painting through court cases in Spain and California, where he lived, but to no avail. After his death in 2010, his children continued trying to obtain the painting, which is now worth tens of millions. The issue at the high court involved whether California or Spanish law applies to the case.<\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"css-1dbjc4n\">\n<div class=\"css-1dbjc4n r-1s2bzr4\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">After hearing arguments on Cassirer vs. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation&nbsp;<a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.algemeiner.com\/2022\/01\/19\/us-supreme-court-hears-arguments-over-painting-stolen-from-jewish-family-by-nazis\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">in January<\/a>, the Supreme Court\u2019s 9-0&nbsp;<a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/21pdf\/20-1566_l5gm.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">ruling<\/a>&nbsp;on Thursday reverts the case back to a lower court in Los Angeles. The Supreme Court said the case should be decided on based on California law, which will help the Cassirer family\u2019s case. The plaintiffs argued that even a purchaser who unknowingly obtained stolen property \u201ccannot prevail against the rightful pre-theft owner.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1dbjc4n\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">\u201cThe path of our decision has been as short as the hunt for Rue Saint-Honor\u00e9 was long,\u201d wrote Justice Elena Kagan in the decision. \u201cOur ruling is as simple as the conflict over its rightful owner has been vexed. A foreign state or instrumentality \u2026 is liable just as a private party would be. That means the standard choice-of-law rule must apply. In a property-law dispute like this one, that standard rule is the forum state\u2019s (here, California\u2019s) \u2014 not any deriving from federal common law.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000080;\">The Supreme Court justices overturned a ruling last year by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which agreed with a federal judge in Los Angeles that the painting was lawfully obtained under Spanish law and should remain with the Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection in Madrid.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr style=\"height: 15px; background: #d0e6fa; width: 100%;\">\n<div id=\"content\" class=\"content-alignment\">\n<div id=\"watch-description\" class=\"yt-uix-button-panel\">\n<div id=\"watch-description-text\" style=\"text-align: center;\">\n<p><em>Zawarto\u015b\u0107 publikowanych artyku\u0142\u00f3w i materia\u0142\u00f3w nie reprezentuje pogl\u0105d\u00f3w ani opinii Reunion&#8217;68,<\/em><em><br \/>\nani te\u017c webmastera Blogu Reunion&#8217;68, chyba ze jest to wyra\u017anie zaznaczone.<br \/>\nTwoje uwagi, linki, w\u0142asne artyku\u0142y lub wiadomo\u015bci prze\u015blij na adres:<br \/>\n<\/em><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong><em><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"mailto:webmaster@reunion68.com\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">webmaster@reunion68.com<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<hr style=\"width: 100%;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>US Supreme Court Unanimously Sides With Jewish Family Who Owned Pissarro Painting Taken by Nazis Shiryn Ghermezian Detail of the painting \u201cRue Saint-Honor\u00e9 in the Afternoon. Effect of Rain\u201d by Camille Pissarro. Photo: public domain In an unanimous ruling on Thursday, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the heirs of a German Jewish [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[26,24],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94780"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=94780"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94780\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":95070,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94780\/revisions\/95070"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=94780"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=94780"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reunion68.se\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=94780"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}