Archive | 2024/03/16

Kluczowa część nowego antysemityzmu: „Nigdy nie ufaj Żydowi”

Oto żart opublikowany w kilku brytyjskich gazetach w 1921 roku


Kluczowa część nowego antysemityzmu: „Nigdy nie ufaj Żydowi”

Elder of Ziyon
Tłumaczenie: Małgorzata Koraszewska


ŻYDOWSKA LEKCJA

Mały chłopiec stoi na porośniętej trawą skarpie i ojciec mówi mu: „Skacz, Abe, skacz. Jesteś bezpieczny. Złapię cię”. Powtarza te słowa dwa razy i Abe skacze upadając na ziemię, bo ojciec nawet nie próbuje go złapać.

„Widzisz, Abe, to cię nauczy – wyjaśnia czuły ojciec – nigdy nie ufaj w niczym Żydowi, nawet własnemu ojcu”

„Morning Post”

W ten sposób świat patrzył na Żydów – jako naród ludzi przebiegłych i niegodnych zaufania.

I to właśnie widzimy w kolejnych miesiącach od 7 października.

Jak już wspomnieliśmyraport ONZ na temat wykorzystywania seksualnego przez Hamas obejmował obszerną weryfikację oskarżeń. Część oskarżeń odrzucono uznając je za niedostatecznie udokumentowane. 

Wspomina o trudnościach związanych z dotarciem do prawdy:

Zespół misji stanął także przed specyficznymi wyzwaniami związanymi z gromadzeniem i weryfikacją przypadków przemocy na tle seksualnym, do których zaliczały się: ograniczona liczba profesjonalnie zebranych materiałów kryminalistycznych; niedokładne i niewiarygodne interpretacje kryminalistyczne dokonywane przez osoby niebędące profesjonalistami; niezwykle ograniczona dostępność ofiar/ocalałych i świadków przemocy seksualnej, między innymi z powodu wewnętrznego przesiedlenia dotkniętych społeczności….

Kiedy jednak zaczęto przeprowadzać wywiady z Palestyńczykami w związku z ich oskarżeniami żołnierzy IDF o wykorzystywanie seksualne Arabek, nie zastosowano żadnego z tych standardów.

Zespół misji odwiedził także Ramallah na okupowanym Zachodnim Brzegu, aby poznać poglądy i obawy palestyńskich urzędników i przedstawicieli społeczeństwa obywatelskiego w odpowiedzi na zarzuty dotyczące przemocy seksualnej związanej z konfliktem, otrzymane w ramach mandatu w następstwie ataków z 7 października, dotyczące izraelskich sił bezpieczeństwa i osadników. Rozmówcy wyrazili troski w sprawie okrutnego, nieludzkiego i poniżającego traktowania Palestyńczyków w ośrodkach internowania, w tym różnych form przemocy seksualnej w postaci inwazyjnych przeszukań ciała, gróźb gwałtu i długotrwałej wymuszonej nagości, a także molestowania seksualnego i groźby gwałtu w domu podczas nalotów i na punktach kontrolnych. Informacje te uzupełnią informacje zweryfikowane już przez inne podmioty ONZ na temat zarzutów CRSV w Gazie i na okupowanym Zachodnim Brzegu w celu potencjalnego włączenia ich do rocznego raportu Sekretarza Generalnego w sprawie przemocy seksualnej związanej z konfliktami.   

Zeznania Żydów, którzy byli świadkami ataków, są sprawdzane z dowodami kryminalistycznymi, zdjęciami i filmami, weryfikowane z innymi świadkami, a wszystko, co nie spełnia ich rzekomo profesjonalnych standardów, nawet nie zostaje wspominane. Jednak wyłącznie słowne oskarżenia ze strony Palestyńczyków są publikowane szczegółowo i nie zawierają absolutnie żadnych dowodów potwierdzających. Użycie przez nich słowa „oskarżenia” nie osłabia kolejnego zdania, w którym „okrutne, nieludzkie i poniżające traktowanie przetrzymywanych Palestyńczyków” zostaje opublikowane jako fakt. 

To podwójna bigoteria: wszelkie oskarżenia pod adresem Żydów są automatycznie akceptowane, ale wszelkie oskarżenia ze strony Żydów są automatycznie odrzucane, dopóki nie zostaną zweryfikowane. Czasami są odrzucane na podstawie tworzonych dla Żydów standardów, których nikt inny nigdy wobec nikogo nie stosował. 

7 października był „sukcesem” z arabskiej perspektywy dzięki oszustwu. Hamas oszukał świat, twierdząc, że troszczy się o dobro swoich obywateli, to znaczy jest pragmatycznym graczem politycznym, a nie grupą w rodzaju ISIS, która była gotowa poświęcić ludzi za możliwość zabicia wielu Żydów. Gospodarka Gazy była najlepszym stanie od czasu przejęcia władzy przez Hamas, więcej ludzi miało pracę od czasu przejęcia władzy przez Hamas, Gaza miała największy import i eksport od czasu przejęcia władzy przez Hamas. Cała ich strategia wojenna opiera się na oszustwie: podstępna napaść militarna 7 października i polityczne kłamstwa każdego dnia od tego czasu.

W ten sposób relacjonowano całą wojnę. Z góry zakłada się, że kłamliwe oświadczenia Hamasu na temat eksplozji w szpitalu Al Ahli i na drogach w Salah-al-Deen oraz paniki, która miała miejsce w zeszłym tygodniu, są prawdą, podczas gdy izraelskie zaprzeczenia są bezwartościowe bez poważnej liczby dowodów zweryfikowanych przez organy zewnętrzne. Hamas ma historię kłamania, a Izrael ma historię, w której jego twierdzenia zostają udowodnione faktami, jednak świat interpretuje sytuację tak, aby nagradzać kłamców, którzy kontrolują wszystkie informacje, i karać stronę, która ma otwarte społeczeństwo, gdzie kłamstwo byłoby ukarane przez wyborców. 

Izraelskie oskarżenia o to, że pracownicy UNRWA są terrorystami, są traktowane poważnie przez mniej więcej jeden dzień, ale potem „weryfikatorzy faktów” twierdzą, że nie ma dowodów, a media i politycy chętnie akceptują ich werdykt, mimo że Izrael z każdym tygodniem publikuje coraz więcej dowodów.

Żydom nie można ufać. A architektom 7 października można ufać – o ile oskarżają Żydów o zbrodnie. (W przeciwnym razie ich kłamstwa zostaną po prostu zignorowane.)

Jest jeszcze gorzej niż to, co mówię. Ponieważ media, „organizacje praw człowieka” i prawodawcy nie tylko zakładają, że Żydzi są kłamcami, ale wierzą, że te kłamstwa są spiskiem. W końcu, kiedy IDF zostaje oskarżona o zbrodnię wojenną, oznacza to, że cała struktura dowodzenia i wielu żołnierzy jest częścią spisku i wszyscy zgodnie kłamią. 

Antysemickie przekonanie, że Żydowi nie można ufać, łączy się z antysemickim przekonaniem o izolujących się i wzajemnie kryjących się Żydach, którzy spiskują, by oszukać świat. 

Dzieje się to codziennie, w wielu gazetach i reportażach telewizyjnych w szanowanych niegdyś mediach. 

Nic z tego nie ma sensu, jeśli nie spojrzy się na to przez pryzmat głęboko zakorzenionej, podświadomej ksenofobii wobec Żydów, która jest całkowicie zgodna z historycznymi antysemickimi uprzedzeniami. 

Prawdziwą ironią jest to, że często ludzie, którzy twierdzą i wierzą, że w zachodnim społeczeństwie istnieje strukturalny, endemiczny rasizm, to ci sami ludzie, którzy wykazują – i usilnie zaprzeczają – tej strukturalnej ksenofobii wobec Żydów.  


Elder of Ziyon – blog amerykańskiego badacza antysemityzmu w mediach i organizacjach.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Sharansky: Oslo sowed the seeds for the October 7 massacre

Sharansky: Oslo sowed the seeds for the October 7 massacre

MAAYAN JAFFE-HOFFMAN, ERICA SCHACHNE


At the Table: An international icon and a local Jerusalem celebrity, often glimpsed on streets and in stores, Natan Sharansky’s presence adds to the “modern-day miracle” feel of life in Israel.

Jerusalem resident and local celebrity Natan Sharansky. / (photo credit: Pamela B. Paresky)

Natan Sharansky arrives at lunch precisely on time, his trademark olive-green cap perched firmly atop his head, complemented by a matching sweater. He exudes a lively energy – even after all he has been through – at age 76.

“I went straight from hell to paradise, and I am still in paradise,” he says of his transition from nine years in a Soviet prison, including 405 days in a punishing cell, to Jerusalem. That time was partly served in a gulag-like “corrective colony,” and included hunger strikes and force-feeding. Indeed, it’s surreal to be sitting down with him in the upscale Pompidou café on the German Colony’s main drag.

An international icon and a local Jerusalem celebrity, often glimpsed on streets and in stores, his presence adds to the “modern-day miracle” feel of life in the Jewish state.

Sharansky orders coffee with milk but is not patient with a digitized menu. “I just want a salad,” he says. “Lots of vegetables.”

His smile is infectious as he talks about his eight grandchildren. A son-in-law was in the reserves for 147 days, and his daughter and her five sons moved in to his home in the capital.

Natan Sharansky is seen greeting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and wife, Sara, at a party celebrating the 25th anniversary of Sharansky’s liberation, Feb. 2011. (credit: Moshe Milner/GPO)

“One of the best parts of being a grandparent is that you enjoy the kids, then they go home to their parents,” he says with a laugh.

He admits to being busy since the war started. Sharansky, a former minister and executive chair of the Jewish Agency, is chairman of five Jewish nonprofits – including two that fight antisemitism and the Babyn Yar Holocaust Memorial Center, through which he is digitizing 200 years of archives.

He jokes that his wife, Avital, keeps asking when he will retire: “I retired five years ago.”

The conversation takes us from Russia (where he was known as Anatoly) to Israel to US college campuses. Sharansky talks animatedly and with a heavy Russian accent.

He vividly recounts the moment he stepped off the KGB airplane toward his newfound freedom. In defiance of the guards’ orders to walk in a straight line, Sharansky chose to zigzag across the tarmac. Another memorable scene is his now-legendary stride across Berlin’s Glienicke Bridge, where he took his first steps toward liberty clad in oversized civilian pants provided ahead of release. He leaped to freedom wearing a rope that served as a makeshift belt, causing the rope to snap. During the subsequent press conference, anxious to be reunited with his wife, he had to clutch his trousers to prevent them from slipping down.

Sharansky also talks about the first time he met Avital in Russia and how “it was love at first glance.” He endearingly tells of urging the young woman to join his group’s Hebrew program, promising he would help her, since he “knew 1,000 words in Hebrew.” Happily, that was the exact amount Avital knew as well. It didn’t take long to realize they both had exaggerated in their mutual eagerness to be together, each knowing “maybe 900 Hebrew words less.”

Hamas-Israel War and October 7 failures

THE DISCUSSION quickly turns to Oct. 7 and the “shocking” and “terrible” failure of Israel’s intelligence community and of the IDF that day. He says, “No one person does not want to fight back and restore peace, but our perception of our security changed that day.”

On the other hand, he says, “I think so much good has come out of our people” since the massacre. “In one day, we went from being a polarized society to the most united. Suddenly, it was clear that the whole year of these mutual accusations was not in the hearts of the people.

“I am sure there will be at least two new parties in the next elections: one to the left of Likud, and one to the right, with new faces for everyone.”

But Sharansky cannot let go of what he believes was the catalyst for the Gaza war: the Oslo Accords, meaning that the seeds of Oct. 7 were planted 30 years ago. He says the approach essentially communicated, “It’s not our business, and it’s not important for us in what kind of society the Palestinians live” but rather that Israel “find a dictator who can guarantee our stability.”

“That was the idea of Oslo,” Sharansky explains. “We are bringing [Yasser] Arafat. We know that he is a ruthless dictator. And we say to the Palestinians, ‘Whether you want it or not, he will be your leader.’ And we say to ourselves, ‘Our prime minister said that it’s good he is not restricted by democracy because that’s how he will defeat Hamas much quicker than we can do it.’”

Sharansky opposed Oslo because he believed Arafat would quickly understand that the only way he could maintain power by force was to find an external enemy. “What other external enemy would he have except us?” Sharansky asks. “A lot of public money was put into Arafat’s account so he would be loyal to us. And it failed big.”

Sharansky says that not only did Arafat not defeat Hamas, but “Hamas defeated him.”

Then came the Disengagement and the vision that Israel could separate from Gaza. Sharansky was the first minister to resign over the idea.

It’s not that Sharansky does not want peace or believe it is achievable, he stresses. Rather, he does not think Israeli and world leaders have gone about obtaining it in the right way. He calls prime minister Shimon Peres “primitive and a neo-Marxist,” having fully bought into a blissful vision of Mideast peace.

“He was so popular because of his optimism,” Sharansky says of Peres. “I am also optimistic, but I am not naive.” Prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, he opines, was more realistic but felt it worthwhile to proceed.

He says he does not believe Ariel Sharon really felt the Disengagement would achieve its goal. Sharon told Sharansky that he thought if Israel separated from Gaza and gave the Gazans complete independence, Israel would have 10 years of international approval – and be able to respond if Gazans carried out attacks against the Jewish state.

“I told him, ‘We don’t have 10 years; we don’t have 10 days,’” Sharansky says. “I was wrong. We had a couple of months.

“We are paying a very big price for our attempts,” Sharansky continues, speaking quickly. “We have no choice now. If we want to continue to exist as a state, we have to destroy Hamas. We have to take control over the security.”

THE CONVERSATION jumps to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who Sharansky believes should have had a two-term limit and needs to retire immediately after the war. But he also says Netanyahu “did great things for our people” and has played “a very important leadership role” in the country’s success.

He cites Netanyahu’s role in developing Israel’s capitalist economy, ensuring the Taglit-Birthright free trip to Israel program (of which Sharansky was an early champion), and highlighting the danger of Russian weapons sales to Iran.

“He deserves a lot of credit,” he says. “No one remembers,” noting that Netanyahu also went out of his way for Sharansky and his family on a personal level.

Anyone who claims Netanyahu is prolonging the war to stay in office is spreading a blood libel, he asserts, and the notion is “nuts.”

“I think that if [Benny] Gantz were the leader today, he would have done the same war as Bibi,” Sharansky says. “I don’t see many choices.”

He also believes there is a second front: American college campuses, which opened up to anti-Israel movements long before this war.

“In 2003, being a minister in the Israeli government, I had a kind of tour of all the universities because I was looking for the roots of antisemitism,” Sharansky recalls. “It was the time of the Second Intifada… when hundreds of our citizens were killed by suicide bombers, and we were fighting against it.

“And then I heard from one student – she was a post-graduate student in Harvard business school. She explained to me that she wanted very much to sign the letter against divestment in support of Israel. But she knew for sure there will be three professors who are very important for her career who will not like it. And that’s why she decided to be silent for a few years until her career was guaranteed.

“And I remember I thought, ‘My God, it’s not at Moscow University in my days when people were double-thinkers. Here in the free world.’”

Rather than blanket hasbara, Sharansky adds, the goal today should be to illustrate how antisemitism is the first warning to a society that it is becoming “illiberal.” He worries the Western world is betraying its liberal ideas in favor of progressive ones.

“The most important struggle in America is not between Left and Right but between liberals and progressives,” Sharansky says. “Progressives are not allies; they are enemies of liberalism. And it was very difficult for many organizations, especially Jewish liberal organizations, to accept this.”

We mention the storm of criticism against Jewish director Jonathan Glazer’s Oscar acceptance speech this past week, in which he “refute[d his] Jewishness and the Holocaust being hijacked by an occupation…” All Jews, Sharansky points out, regardless of ideology, would be rounded up like the ethnic German Jews if it came down to it.

But he believes Oct. 7 should have enlightened these Jewish organizations, along with figures like Glazer – especially given the response to the heinous sexual crimes perpetrated by Hamas against Israeli women.

“The most awful violation of women’s rights [going back hundreds of years] … and these organizations [like UN Women] are not ready to say a word. They are silent at best,” Sharansky says, noting that some progressives even say the Israelis deserved it because they are “oppressors.”

“That’s like the best proof that progressive organizations are not liberal organizations,” Sharansky concludes.■


Pamela B. Paresky contributed to this article.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Biden Should be Threatening Qatar and the Terrorists, Not Israel

Biden Should be Threatening Qatar and the Terrorists, Not Israel

Bassam Tawil


  • Biden’s reported threat to halt or suspend US military supplies to Israel if the IDF enters Rafah is what encourages Hamas to continue fighting and reject every proposal to release the hostages. When Hamas leaders hear that Biden is threatening Israel to prevent the IDF from entering Rafah, they must say to themselves: “Why should we make any concessions to Israel? America doesn’t want the Israelis to destroy the four remaining battalions. The US administration is opposed to Israel’s plan to eliminate Hamas, so let’s wait!”
  • A total defeat means the elimination of all of Hamas’s battalions. An Israeli victory will never be complete as long as one, or even half, a Hamas battalion remains intact.
  • Biden is actually sending a message to Hamas and Iran’s other terror proxies, including Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Houthis, that America is about to throw Israel under the bus. Cutting off US weapons supplies to Israel is the ultimate fantasy of the terrorists.
  • The administration could show impressive leadership and in fact “bring this to an end as quickly as we can” — not just for Israel but for all in the region who are seeking peace — by encouraging Israel to take out the terrorists in Rafah without delay.
  • Instead of pressuring Israel, Biden should be pressuring his friends in Qatar to force their Hamas puppets to hand over the Israeli hostages and surrender. Instead of threatening to cut off weapons supplies to Israel, he should be threatening the leaders of Qatar with the withdrawal of US forces from the country’s Al Udeid Air Base and to officially designate Qatar as a State Sponsor of Terrorism (for its funding of Hamas, Hizballah, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Taliban, Al Shabab, Al Nusra Front, among others).
  • This is the way – the only way – to end the war quickly, as well as to send a signal to America’s adversaries looking on, that the US is prepared to uphold the values of civilization, not the values of terror.

US President Joe Biden’s reported threat to halt or suspend US military supplies to Israel if the IDF enters Rafah is what encourages Hamas to continue fighting and reject every proposal to release the hostages. Pictured: Biden delivers the State of the Union address in the US Capitol on March 7, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

US President Joe Biden will consider conditioning military supplies to Israel if the Israeli army moves forward with a large-scale invasion of the city of Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, according to four US officials.

Biden has also told MSNBC that a Rafah operation would cross a “red line,” although he balanced that statement with a commitment to support Israel’s right to self-defense.

Israeli security sources have revealed that the Iran-backed Hamas terror group has at least four battalions in Rafah. Many of the Israeli hostages kidnapped by Hamas terrorists and other Palestinians on October 7, 2023, are also believed to be held in Rafah.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have succeeded in destroying most of Hamas’s battalions in other areas of the Gaza Strip.

Israeli forces have dismantled 17 of Hamas’s 24 combat battalions in the Gaza Strip, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on February 4.

“The increasing defeat of Hamas in Gaza is an important achievement for the IDF,” said Middle East expert Seth Frantzman.

“Hamas terrorists have lost control of significant areas in Gaza, enabling the dismantling of the terrorist infrastructure the group built up over previous decades. It is essential the IDF be supported in its efforts to prevent further threats by Hamas and other terrorist groups to Israel and the region.”

Biden’s reported threat to halt or suspend US military supplies to Israel if the IDF enters Rafah is what encourages Hamas to continue fighting and reject every proposal to release the hostages. When Hamas leaders hear that Biden is threatening Israel to prevent the IDF from entering Rafah, they must say to themselves: “Why should we make any concessions to Israel? America doesn’t want the Israelis to destroy the four remaining battalions. The US administration is opposed to Israel’s plan to eliminate Hamas, so let’s wait!”

Asking Israel not to invade Rafah and destroy the Hamas terrorists holed up in the city is akin to requesting that someone running in a marathon stop before reaching the finish line. There is no alternative to a total defeat of Hamas, especially in the aftermath of its October 7 massacre of 1,200 Israelis. A total defeat means the elimination of all of Hamas’s battalions. An Israeli victory will never be complete as long as one, or even half, a Hamas battalion remains intact.

According to Brigadier General (res.) Amir Avivi, Chairman and Founder of Israel Defense and Security Forum:

“The Americans should understand the consequences of [Biden’s] red line: a guarantee that another October 7 will happen again, that hostages will never come home, that an emboldened Iran will intensify on all fronts and that Hamas-oppressed civilians will suffer indefinitely.

“One of the reasons for this could be President Biden’s willingness to avoid dissent at the Democratic National Convention in August, and he is worried about losing the state of Michigan in the coming election as young people and Arab-Americans defect over his Israel policy. Israel has a right to defend itself, he seems to now be saying, but it should stop the war now. President Biden expressed this dichotomous position in his State of the Union address last week and reiterated this point in the MSNBC interview.”

On November 25, 2023, Biden was quoted as saying that Israel’s goal of eliminating Hamas was a legitimate but difficult mission. “I don’t know how long it will take,” Biden told reporters.

My expectation and hope is that as we move forward, the rest of the Arab world and the region is also putting pressure on all sides to slow this down, to bring this to an end as quickly as we can.”

Four months later, Biden appears to have changed his mind about obliterating Hamas. His warning to Israel not to enter Rafah implies that the Biden administration actually wants Israel to lose the war against Hamas. This would mean that Hamas will continue to rule the Gaza Strip and plan more October 7-style massacres against Israelis. Hamas official Ghazi Hamad has clearly said that the terror group will repeat the October 7 attack, time and again, until Israel is annihilated.

The most dangerous part of Biden’s statements is the threat to suspend or halt US shipments of weapons and ammunition aid to Israel should it proceed with its plans to launch a ground offensive in Rafah, destroy Hamas and release the hostages.

Biden is actually sending a message to Hamas and Iran’s other terror proxies, including Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Houthis, that America is about to throw Israel under the bus. Cutting off US weapons supplies to Israel is the ultimate fantasy of the terrorists.

It is no wonder, then, that in their statements, several Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad leaders have been calling for an immediate halt to US weapons shipments to Israel.

The Palestinian terrorists want the Americans to stop supplying Israel with weapons and ammunition because that would facilitate their mission of killing Jews and destroying Israel. The terrorists are angry because they want Israel to be weak and defenseless. Hamas leaders have just one problem with carrying out more October 7-like massacres against Israelis: the US and other Western countries’ providing armaments to Israel complicates the terrorists’ dream of slaughtering Jews.

“We must teach Israel a lesson,” Hamad said.

“The Al-Aqsa Flood [Hamas’s name for its Oct 7 invasion of Israel] is just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth. Will we have to pay a price? Yes, and we are ready to pay it. We are called a nation of martyrs, and we are proud to sacrifice martyrs.”

The Biden administration would see more success if it stopped underestimating such threats from a brutal terror group that has shown itself perfectly capable of the mass murder, rape, beheadings, and burning alive of Israeli civilians. The administration could show impressive leadership and in fact “bring this to an end as quickly as we can” — not just for Israel but for all in the region who are seeking peace — by encouraging Israel to take out the terrorists in Rafah without delay.

The administration would also do well to stop the talk about punishing Israel by cutting off military supplies. Instead of pressuring Israel, Biden should be pressuring his friends in Qatar to force their Hamas puppets to hand over the Israeli hostages and surrender. Instead of threatening to cut off weapons supplies to Israel, he should be threatening the leaders of Qatar with the withdrawal of US forces from the country’s Al Udeid Air Base and to officially designate Qatar as a State Sponsor of Terrorism (for its funding of HamasHizballahISISAl QaedaTalibanAl ShababAl Nusra Front, among others).

This is the way – the only way – to end the war quickly, as well as to send a signal to America’s adversaries looking on, that the US is prepared to uphold the values of civilization, not the values of terror.


Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com