Archive | August 2017

Can’t stop paying terrorists — so Trump can’t make a deal

The Palestinian Authority can’t stop paying terrorists — so Trump can’t make a deal

Jonathan S. Tobin


Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Palestinian President Mahmud Abbas AFP/Getty Images

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is seen as a savvy player in an administration where the president doesn’t have much background on foreign policy. That’s especially true in the Middle East, where the former oil executive knows the territory. But this week Tillerson made a damaging and amateurish mistake in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The problem arose on Tuesday when, during testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Tillerson let drop a bombshell. When asked about the Palestinian Authority’s payment of salaries to imprisoned terrorists and their families, the secretary announced the problem had already been solved. “They have changed that policy,” Tillerson assured Idaho Sen. James Risch.

If true, that would be quite a feather in Tillerson’s cap. But the claim was false. A day later, when speaking to the House Foreign Relations Committee, he was forced to backtrack and admit that instead there was only an “active discussion” about the issue. But, later in his testimony, Tillerson insisted he still believed the assurances he got from PA leader Mahmoud Abbas during President Trump’s visit to the region.

That left members of Congress wondering: What, exactly, does Tillerson think is going on?

As it turns out, the Palestinians are a more reliable source of information than the State Department. Within hours of Tillerson’s statement, members of Abbas’ government announced payments to terrorists hadn’t stopped and there were no plans to stop them. Indeed, they considered the entire discussion a form of “aggression” against the Palestinian people.

That leaves Tillerson and the United States in a delicate position.

The problem is not just that the PA uses the massive aid it gets from both the European Union and the United States to pay for terrorism — in just the last four years, they have doled out more than $1.1 billion to those who seek to kill Jews, Israelis and Americans. But by going public about this outrage, Trump and Tillerson have staked their reputations on ending it.

When Abbas visited the White House in early May, he told Trump the Palestinian Authority didn’t conduct incitement or pay terrorist salaries. But by the time Trump met with Abbas in Bethlehem weeks later, he learned that the Palestinian leader had lied. Reportedly, Trump pounded the table while demanding Abbas clean upzhis act.

But apparently neither Trump nor Tillerson has drawn the logical conclusion from this exchange. Abbas has a long record of lying about his connections to violence as well as the hate broadcast on the PA’s official media and taught in its schools. So when Abbas promised again to be good, Tillerson may have believed him.

Tillerson’s motivation may in part be to head off passage of the Taylor Force Act, a necessary piece of legislation opposed by the State Department that’s named after an American murdered by a Palestinian “martyr.” Under its terms, the payment of future US aid to the Palestinians would be conditioned on the elimination of the payments to terrorists.
What Tillerson doesn’t understand is that anti-Jewish violence is an essential element of the Palestinian national narrative. Ending support for terror is essential to peace, but it’s also an impossible ask for Abbas, who is rightly worried about losing support to his Hamas rivals.

Trump and Tillerson may have thought the need for Israel and Sunni Arab states like Saudi Arabia to cooperate against Iran made dabbling in Middle East peace a low-risk, high-profit venture. But they didn’t count on the continued hold of a Palestinian political culture that makes it impossible for Abbas to end the payments.

And by announcing that the PA had already stopped them, Tillerson gambled American credibility on getting Abbas to make a promise he can’t keep. Indeed, Tillerson set back Trump’s own negotiating position because now that the Palestinians have revealed the truth, the White House can’t plausibly claim it can get the Palestinians to stop the practice.

All of which means Trump’s peace initiative is likely over even before it starts, making this an embarrassing introduction to a conflict he has no more chance of fixing than his predecessors.


Jonathan S. Tobin is opinion editor of JNS.org and a contributing writer for National Review.


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com

 


“Palestinian” UN ambassador publicly justifies slaughtering Jewish family in home

“Palestinian” UN ambassador publicly justifies slaughtering Jewish family in home

    eyeontheun



Wow, the Palestinian leadership has officially reached a new low. Justifying murdering the Salamon family in their home??

The “Palestinian” UN ambassador responded to a reporter asking about the attack, and he said, “Don’t expect all Palestinians to be angels, not to react…” WHAT?! Not to react to what? The Israelis treat the “Palestinian” people better than the “Palestinians” treat their own people!

And then the ambassador goes on to say, “If people think that the “Palestinian” people are going to live that situation without any form of resistance to it, that is not realistic and that is not fair.”

Yes, he actually just said “that is not fair” to expect his people not to kill Jewish People.

Does the world realize yet that these are the types of people we are supposed to try to make peace with?

 


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com

 


Izrael na horyzoncie

Izrael na horyzoncie

REDAKCJA


JUŻ W CZWARTEK ROZPOCZYNA SIĘ WE WROCŁAWIU 17. MIĘDZYNARODOWY FESTIWAL FILMOWY T-MOBILE NOWE HORYZONTY. W TYM ROKU NOWYM FILMOM IZRAELSKIM ZOSTANIE POŚWIĘCONA OSOBNA SEKCJA. OPRÓCZ KILKUNASTU FILMÓW Z IZRAELA, ZOBACZYMY TEŻ DZIEŁA O TEMATYCE ŻYDOWSKIEJ Z INNYCH KRAJÓW.

Cały program festiwalu można prześledzić tutaj, poniżej wymieniamy filmy i wydarzenia związane z kulturą izraelską i żydowską.

„Chidusz” będzie uważnie śledził to, co dzieje się na ekranach Kina Nowe Horyzonty, a o najciekawszych filmach porozmawiamy z ich twórcami.

W Międzynarodowym Konkursie Nowe Horyzonty zostanie pokazany film amerykańskiego twórcy Joshuy Z. Weinsteina „Menashe”, w dużej mierze nakręcony w jidysz, a rozgrywający się w środowisku chasydów z Brooklynu. Opowiada on historię wdowca, typowego nieudacznika (charakter znany z literatury jidysz), który sam chciałby wychowywać swojego syna, ale nie pozwala mu na to rodzina – przynajmniej dopóki się nie ożeni. The New York Times określił film jako „delikatną komedię”. Pokazy podczas MFF T-Mobile Nowe Horyzonty: 9.08 (godz. 13:15), 10.08 (godz. 16:15).

 

FILMY SEKCJI NOWE KINO IZRAELA

  • „Czuwaj nad nią” – film nakręcony przez ultraortodoksyjną kobietę, Dinę Perlstein. Wywołał wiele kontrowersji ze względu na pokazanie w nim przenikających się światów kobiet i mężczyzn. Opowiada historię dziennikarki, która, jadąc do Syrii, dowiaduje się, że jej ojciec był pochodzącym stamtąd Arabem. Pokaz: 9.08 (godz. 16:00)
  • „Droga Aszera” – film, opowiadając historię chłopaka u progu dorosłości, pokazuje zarazem społeczne różnice między dwoma grupami w Izraelu: Żydami aszkenazyjskimi i sefardyjskimi. Zainspirowany historią życia reżysera, Matana Yaira. Pokazy: 11.08 (godz. 13:15), 12.08 (godz. 13:15)
  • „Kraina małych ludzi” – Izrael w cieniu kolejnego konfliktu zbrojnego. Dzieciaki z rodzin wojskowych zakładają swoją bazę, w której przypadkiem zamieszkają prawdziwi żołnierze – dwójka dezerterów z armii. Pokazy: 11.08 (godz. 15:45), 12.08 (godz. 9:45)
  • „Ludzie, którzy nie są mną” – młoda dziewczyna (w tej roli sama reżyserka, debiutująca Hadas ben Aroya), zagubiona w telawiwskiej hipsterskiej bańce, próbuje znaleźć autentyczne uczucia i bliskość. Pokazy: 10.08 (godz. 19:15), 11.08 (godz. 19:15)

 

  • „Mr. Gaga” – najgłośniejszy dokument o tańcu od czasów „Piny”. Portret wybitnego izraelskiego choreografa Ohada Naharina. Pokaz (bezpłatny) na wrocławskim Rynku: 8.08 (godz. 22:00)
  • „Odpływ” – nauczyciel historii odmawia stawienia się na rutynowym treningu dla żołnierzy rezerwy. Film mocno spleciony ze współczesną i nieco starszą historią Izraela. Pokazy: 10.08 (godz. 15:45), 11.08 (godz. 9:45)
  • „Pomiędzy” – wystarczy powiedzieć, że na reżyserkę tego filmu, urodzoną w Budapeszcie Palestynkę Mayslound Hamoud, po jego premierze została nałożona fatwa. Film opowiadający losy trzech skrajnie od siebie różnych Palestynek mieszkających w Tel Awiwie zdobył nagrody na festiwalach w Toronto, San Sebastian i w Hajfie. Pokazy: 8.08 (godz. 10:15), 10.08 (godz. 22:15)
  • „Poprzednie życie” – zagadka z czasów Zagłady, która wychodzi na jaw w Niemczech w latach 70. Nieznajoma kobieta wyjawia jednej z członkiń izraelskiego chóru, że jej ojciec, ceniony ginekolog, który przeżył wojnę w Polsce, jest mordercą. Scenariusz został oparty na autentycznych wspomnieniach lekarza Barucha Milcha. Amerykański magazyn „Variety” pisał o filmie: „Głęboko poruszający, pełen suspensów, wciągający dramat ze zniewalająco piękną muzyką”. Pokazy: 6.08 (godz. 12:45), 7.08 (godz. 9:45).
  • „Przez ścianę” – kolejny film autorki głośnego i wielokrotnie nagradzanego „Wypełnić pustkę”, Ramy Burshtein. Ortodoksyjna reżyserka w konwencji komedii romantycznej opowiada o randkowaniu w świecie, w którym przed ślubem narzeczona nie może nawet dotknąć swojego przyszłego męża. Pokazy: 7.08 (godz. 16:15), 8.08 (godz. 19:15)

 

  • „Spokojne serce” – historia utalentowanej pianistki, która wyprowadza się do Jerozolimy, by tam znaleźć wewnętrzny spokój. Pokazy: 9.08 (godz. 18:45), 10.08 (godz. 12:45)
  • „Tikkun” – uczeń jesziwy mdleje podczas postu. Ledwo odratowany, na nowo będzie próbował zdefiniować, czym jest dla niego wiara. Pokazy: 6.08 (godz. 18:45)
  • „Włamywaczka” – kolejny film o ogromnej samotności. Matka Yael któregoś dnia po prostu znika. Dziewczyna zaczyna włamywać się do domów innych ludzi i podglądać ich życie. Pokazy: 10.08 (godz. 10:15), 11.08 (godz. 22:15).
    Warto wybrać się także na wykład Marlyn Vinig, izraelskiej badaczki i specjalistki od kina tworzonego przez ultraortodoksyjne kobiety. Na wykład
  • „Kino chasydek” w środę, 9.08 o godz. 13:00, wstęp jest bezpłatny.

FILMY W INNYCH SEKCJACH

  • „Nigdy nie zapomnij kłamać” – film Mariana Marzyńskiego, który jako dziecko przeżył Zagładę, a po latach powraca do Polski, żeby zmierzyć się z przeszłością. Pokaz: 11.08 (godz. 13:00)
  • „CHOMIKi” – film dokumentujący artystyczny eksperyment – „epidemię tańca”, która wybuchła w Brukseli po zamachu w Muzeum Żydowskim w 2014 roku. Pokazy: 5.08 (godz. 13:30), 6.08 (godz. 16:45)
  • „The World is Mine” – izraelska reżyserka Ann Oren towarzyszy japońskiej „cyber diwie” Hatsune Miku. Pokazy: 7.08 (godz. 18:45), 8.08 (godz.15:45)
  • „Bliskość” – film uznany za canneńskie objawienie 2017 roku i laureat nagrody FIPRESCI na tym festiwalu. Główną bohaterką jest młoda Żydówka Ilana, w tle napięcia religijne północnego Kaukazu i konflikt pomiędzy społecznością żydowską a muzułmańskimi Kabardyjczykami. Pokazy: 5.08 (godz. 16:15), 7.08 (godz. 16:15), 11.08 (godz. 16:15), 13.08 (godz. 19:15).

Instalacja „Homefront”. Fot. The Artist and Sommer Contemporaty Art

W galerii BWA w piątek, 4 sierpnia (godz. 19:00), będzie miał miejsce wernisaż wystawy „Homefront” (do obejrzenia przez cały czas trwania festiwalu) stworzonej przez pięcioro izraelskich artystów. To instalacja, w której widz wejdzie do zbudowanego z kilku pomieszczeń domu. Ta wizyta stanie się pretekstem do opowiedzenia o życiu na Bliskim Wschodzie oraz o problemach, z jakimi borykają się Izraelczycy od momentu, kiedy w 1948 roku powstało ich państwo.

Do zobaczenia w kinie!


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com

 


My Grandfather, the Secret Policeman

My Grandfather, the Secret Policeman

   Jacob Mikanowski


A portrait of the author’s grandfather, in the 1950s.


In my family, we’ve lived without God for a hundred years. It’s had its ups and downs.

The family romance with Communism began with my great-grandfather Solomon. He was a gardener from Warsaw. In 1914 he was drafted into the Russian Army to fight in World War I. By 1917 the Russian Empire’s war effort had largely ground to a halt. Unrest among soldiers on the front helped to spark the Russian Revolution. Solomon took part. Exactly how, I don’t know, but by 1919 he was serving as a judge in a revolutionary soldiers’ court in Vitebsk, in modern-day Belarus. When he tried to return to Poland the following year, he was imprisoned for being a Communist, and freed only through the help of friends in the Red Cross.

The romance continued with Solomon’s son, my grandfather Jakub. Jakub was born in 1912. He dropped out of school after the seventh grade and began working when he was 12. He was a laborer in a rubber plant and a porter in a chemical factory. With his sisters, he belonged to the Communist Youth League in Warsaw. He made friends in the party and asked to join. His friends advised him not to; they needed someone who hadn’t been “burned” by the police to run the mimeograph machine.

When Nazi Germany invaded Poland on Sept. 1, 1939, my grandfather was drafted into the Polish Army. He was captured by the Germans, and he escaped. He went east, to Minsk in the Soviet Union, and sent for his father and sisters. Two came, and two stayed in Warsaw.

In Minsk, Jakub drove a truck. His father worked on a farm. His brother-in-law did lighting for the opera. In 1941, the Germans moved east, into the Soviet Union. When the German Army arrived, my grandfather was transporting the wounded from the front in his truck. Again, he was captured. Again, he escaped.

recommended by:
Branley Zeichner

His sisters fled to the east. His father was shot. Making his way through the countryside, he ran into a group of Soviet officers who had been separated from their units. Together, they got through the German lines by crossing the Dnieper River. Once on the other side, he enrolled in a school that taught guerrilla tactics to would-be partisans. After that came a parachute course. In the spring of 1942, he joined a company of 18 partisans on their way to be dropped behind German lines. Fifteen survived. After a few weeks, he was their commander. Soon, he was in charge of a second company. He kept being promoted because his commanding officers kept getting killed.

Jakub applied for Communist Party membership that winter, while still in the field. He was accepted shortly thereafter. All told, he spent over two years in the woods fighting a guerrilla war against the German Army. In that time, he won a little bit of renown. He’s even mentioned in Volume 3 of the Workers’ History of the Socialist Republic of Belarus (the best volume, in my opinion).

The end of the war found Jakub in a field hospital, recovering from shrapnel wounds. A short while later, he was in Berlin, then in the city of Wroclaw, in western Poland, then back in Warsaw. He returned to a ravaged country and a ruined city. Two of his sisters were dead. One died in Treblinka; the other was shot in a mass execution in 1942, after she was caught on the wrong side of the ghetto wall.

In 1945, he was working in something called the Society of Soviet-Polish Friendship. Soon thereafter, he joined the Ministry of Public Security — the secret police.

In Poland today, having worked for the secret police is a heavy thing to admit. The Ministry of Public Security played a crucial role in imposing Communist Party rule by force after the World War II. Its members jailed the opposition and silenced critics. To establish its dominance, the Communist Party fought what amounted to a low-level civil war against the vestiges of the non-Communist resistance. The Ministry of Public Security was the hard edge of Communist power in Poland. In its role as a counterintelligence organization, it also engaged in a shadow war with the C.I.A. and other Western spy agencies. And it’s in this role that my grandfather’s story reappears in the files.

Most of what I know about his life after his career as a partisan comes from a Communist Party personnel file, which I decided to request from the Polish Institute of National Remembrance after finding a tantalizing mention of my grandfather’s postwar life in another one of the institute’s publications. But the file is vague on what he was doing in those years. It simply lists the departments he was posted to: the department for fighting counterrevolution; counterintelligence; countersabotage. Now it becomes necessary to follow him through the footnotes of historians who study intelligence operations during the start of the Cold War.

In 1950, he turns up as a case officer involved in something called Operation Caesar. Operation Caesar was a false-flag operation, in which the Polish secret police rounded up members of a real, underground resistance group and persuaded them to switch sides. Then they sent them across the Iron Curtain to the West. In the guise of a real resistance movement, they received money and matériel from the C.I.A. and MI6 — over $1 million, and several hundred pounds of gold in total — then turned around and passed those on to their Polish handlers. My grandfather, it seems, was one of those handlers.

What happened next is difficult to say. He died in 1963, when my mother was 7. She didn’t know him well. What memories I’ve heard from that time are fragments. He played tennis. He read books. He announced his engagement to my grandmother by saying to his sister, “Jadzia, I’m getting married. Let me have a shirt.” In fact, the best source of information on his life is the file, which we obtained only last year. Even so, much is unsaid.

His story fits into a pattern. My grandfather belonged to a generation of Polish Jews that grew up with the revolution and put all their faith in it. If they survived long enough, they lived to see that faith betrayed.

For Polish Jews in the 1920s and ’30s, joining the Communist movement represented the “most radical of all possible rebellions,” in the words of the Swedish sociologist Jaff Schatz, who wrote the defining work on this generation. It was a rebellion against one’s parents and the traditions of Jewish life. It also meant participating in an illegal organization, which brought with it the constant possibility of imprisonment.

To the members of my grandfather’s generation, Communism was a way to be modern and a way to escape the shtetl. It was a way to fight anti-Semitism and oppose fascism, both in Poland and worldwide. And perhaps most important, it was way to build the future and be a part of something larger than themselves. Being a Communist was a life of total commitment, persecution and permanent insecurity. But becoming a Communist also meant an intense sense of participation in the movement of history and in the revolutionary upheaval of the world. That upheaval would come soon enough — just not in the way they expected.

The participation of Jews in the Polish Communist movement eventually crystallized into a widespread stereotype. The term for it is Zydokomuna, Polish for Judeo-Communism. Usually, the word is meant as a slur, a way of equating Jews with terror and foreign usurpation. The historian André Gerrits describes it as “a xenophobic assertion, a myth, a delusion.” And indeed, it doesn’t stand up to closer historical scrutiny. Numerically, Communists were a tiny proportion of the larger Jewish community. Within the Polish Communist movement, Jews were a significant and overrepresented, minority — but still a minority. It remains a pillar of anti-Semitic discourse in Poland to this day.

On the whole, Zydokomuna — the equation of Communism with Judaism — is a delusion and, in common usage, a slur. But for my family at least, it carries a kernel of truth. My grandfather (both of them, actually) belonged to a generation caught between fascism and communism with very little room to maneuver between the two. Before the war, joining the Communist Party meant rebellion. During it, it meant survival.

But there was another dimension to my grandfather’s life beside the one described in his party file. In 1963, one of his fellow partisans from Belarus recorded him on his deathbed in a Warsaw hospital speaking about his wartime service.

There, he narrates his autobiographical statement in his Communist Party file, which emphasizes his class background and political work. This time, his testimony centers on one episode from a long war: the night of Jan. 21, 1943. His unit was in the Belarussian village of Novy Svyerzhan, the site of a German work camp for imprisoned Jews. Jakub and his unit decided to storm it under the cover of darkness. They used a soldier disguised as a peasant on a horse as a decoy to approach the camp gates. Then they attacked with machine guns and grenades. After they set the lumber yard ablaze, the surviving Germans ran away. Two hundred Jewish slave workers ran for freedom.

What does it mean to fight on the right side of the war, but the wrong side of history?

Depending on whom you ask today, my grandfather’s story is that of a partisan, a traitor, a hero or a spy. The revolution asked a terrible amount of those who served it. Those who resisted paid a similarly awful price. It left in its wake countless lives, like my grandfather’s, that cannot be compassed by a single line.


Jacob Mikanowski (@JMikanowski) is a journalist and critic.
This is an essay in the series Red Century, about the history and legacy of Communism 100 years after the Russian Revolution.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook and Twitter (@NYTopinion), and sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com

 


Fatah Official Jamal Muhaisen Calls to Unite against “Number One Enemy” – Israel

Fatah Official Jamal Muhaisen Calls to Unite against “Number One Enemy” Israel; Can’t Anybody Lead the Armies for the Sake of the Al-Aqsa Mosque? Rights Are Taken by Force

source: Palestinian Authority TV



Fatah Central Committee member Jamal Muhaisen called to redirect the “compass” of battle against Israel and resist American and Israeli efforts to create secondary battles in order to divert the Arab nation from its primary battle, against Israel, “which is defiling the Islamic and Christian holy places and taking control of the land.” Speaking on the official Palestinian Authority TV channel on July 23, Muhaisan said this was an historic opportunity to change the course of events in the Middle East. “Can’t anybody lead the armies for the sake of the Al-Aqsa Mosque?” he asked, adding: “One does not beg for rights. Rights are taken by force.”

 


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com