Archive | July 2021

Poll: 25% of American Jewish Voters Believe Israel is an Apartheid State

Poll: 25% of American Jewish Voters Believe Israel is an Apartheid State

Aaron Bandler


Thousands of demonstrators rally march to the Israeli consulate on May 12, 2021 in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

The poll, which was conducted by the Jewish Electorate Institute from June 28-July 1, asked respondents if they agreed or disagreed with the statement “Israel is an apartheid state.” Twenty-five percent answered in the affirmative; 52% disagreed, but those that disagreed were split on whether or not calling Israel an apartheid state is antisemitic––28% said it is antisemitic, while 24% said it isn’t.

Additionally, 34% agreed with the statement “Israel’s treatment of Palestinians is similar to racism in the U.S.” and 22% agreed that “Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians”; of those that disagreed with these statements, 20% and 31% viewed them as antisemitic, respectively. Only 9% said they agreed that “Israel doesn’t have the right to exist,” and 67% of those that disagreed with the statement said that not believing in Israel’s right to exist is antisemitic. Sixty-two percent said they had an emotional attachment to Israel.

The survey also asked respondents about which groups they are most concerned when it comes to antisemitism. Sixty-one percent said they were primarily concerned about antisemitism from right-wing groups and individuals, whereas 22% said they were most concerned about antisemitism from the left, and 12% said they were concerned about antisemitism from both the left and the right.

On President Joe Biden, 80% said they approved of his performance so far as president and 74% said they approved of his handling of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Sixty-four percent said they preferred Biden’s handling of antisemitism to how former President Donald Trump handled it; 63% said they believe Biden is doing a better of job of handling the Israeli-Palestinian conflict than Trump did.

The Jewish Democratic Council of America (JDCA) hailed the poll as evidence of “why the past four years have only solidified the Democratic Party as the political home of Jewish Americans” in a tweet. JDCA also noted that “for the first time … Republican efforts to suppress the vote are a top political concern of Jewish voters,” a reference to how the poll found that 76% favor new laws “expanding voting rights” and 62% favor removing the Senate filibuster to get those laws implemented.

Others expressed concern about how a quarter of the respondents view Israel as an apartheid state.

“Poll finds a quarter of US Jews completely uneducated on Israel,” international human rights lawyer Arsen Ostrovsky tweeted.

The Elder of Ziyon blogger noted in a post that “the numbers are even worse for the young.” “American Jews are thoroughly ignorant about their own history, their religion, and the Jewish state. That ignorance translates into apathy and then into a willingness to believe the enthusiastic modern antisemites who pretend that they are merely anti-Israel.” The blogger added that the survey results reflect “a massive failure of American Jewish leadership, Jewish education, synagogues and the previous generation of American Jews who taught their children that Judaism and Israel aren’t priorities for them.”

H/T: Jewish Telegraphic Agency


W sondażu przeprowadzonym przez Żydowski Instytut Wyborczy w dniach 28 czerwca-1 lipca zapytano respondentów, czy zgadzają się, czy nie zgadzają ze stwierdzeniem „Izrael to państwo apartheidu”. Dwadzieścia pięć procent odpowiedziało twierdząco; 52% nie zgodziło się, ale ci, którzy się nie zgadzali, byli podzieleni co do tego, czy nazywanie Izraela państwem apartheidu jest antysemickie – 28% stwierdziło, że jest antysemicki, podczas gdy 24% stwierdziło, że nie.

Ponadto 34% zgodziło się ze stwierdzeniem „Traktowanie Palestyńczyków przez Izrael jest podobne do rasizmu w USA”. a 22% zgodziło się, że „Izrael dokonuje ludobójstwa na Palestyńczykach”; spośród tych, którzy nie zgadzali się z tymi stwierdzeniami, odpowiednio 20% i 31% uważało je za antysemickie. Tylko 9% stwierdziło, że zgodziło się, że „Izrael nie ma prawa do istnienia”, a 67% z tych, którzy nie zgodzili się z tym stwierdzeniem, stwierdziło, że niewiara w prawo Izraela do istnienia jest antysemityzmem. Sześćdziesiąt dwa procent stwierdziło, że mają emocjonalne przywiązanie do Izraela.

W ankiecie zapytano również respondentów o to, które grupy są najbardziej zaniepokojone antysemityzmem. Sześćdziesiąt jeden procent stwierdziło, że obawia się przede wszystkim antysemityzmu z prawicowych grup i jednostek, podczas gdy 22% stwierdziło, że najbardziej obawia się antysemityzmu z lewicy, a 12% stwierdziło, że obawia się antysemityzmu zarówno z lewicy, jak i z prawicy.

Jeśli chodzi o prezydenta Joe Bidena, 80% stwierdziło, że aprobuje jego dotychczasowe osiągnięcia jako prezydenta, a 74% stwierdziło, że aprobowało jego podejście do konfliktu izraelsko-palestyńskiego. Sześćdziesiąt cztery procent powiedziało, że wolą podejście Bidena do antysemityzmu niż sposób, w jaki radził sobie z nim były prezydent Donald Trump; 63% powiedziało, że uważa, że ​​Biden radzi sobie lepiej z konfliktem izraelsko-palestyńskim niż Trump.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Hamas accuses Israel of ‘falsifying’ Jerusalem history

Hamas accuses Israel of ‘falsifying’ Jerusalem history

KHALED ABU TOAMEH


A Hamas spokesperson said that Israel’s effort to “falsify history and distort the facts will not help it, and Jerusalem will remain the capital of Palestine and its Arab Islamic identity.”

Remains of destruction discovered near the wall from previous excavations. / (photo credit: ELIYAHU YANAI/CITY OF DAVID ARCHIVES)

Hamas responded on Wednesday to the news about the discovery of a section of Jerusalem’s city wall built during the First Temple period by accusing Israel of “falsifying” history.

Hamas spokesman Muhammad Hamadeh said that Israel’s effort to “falsify history and distort the facts will not help it, and Jerusalem will remain the capital of Palestine and its Arab Islamic identity.”

The Antiquities Authority (IAA) announced that the section of the wall that was mostly destroyed by the Babylonian army in 586 BCE has been uncovered by archaeologists in the City of David National Park.

Hamadeh dismissed the announcement and accused Israel of “falsifying and stealing history.”

He said that the announcement was “a continuation of previous announcements related to the alleged Temple.”

The announcement, Hamadeh said, represents a “continuation of the [Israeli] approach based on the forgery and theft of the history of the holy city.”
He also claimed that the announcement was part of Israel’s “plans to Judaize Jerusalem and obliterate its Arab Islamic identity.”

He added: “The aggression of the occupation did not stop at the limits of falsifying history. Rather, it seeks to change the reality. The announcement of these alleged discoveries comes in conjunction with the normalization agreements [between Israel and four Arab countries] that gave it an international cover.”

The spokesman warned Israel against causing “harm and vandalism” in the area of the Aqsa Mosque compound.

Earlier this week, Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh called on the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization to examine Israel’s excavations “beneath the Aqsa Mosque compound and prevent the intended plans of the Israel Antiquities Authority to expand the tunnel located below the al-Buraq Wall,” referring to the Western Wall.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


The murderous doctrine of moral equivalence

The murderous doctrine of moral equivalence

Melanie Phillips


It’s not enough for politicians to promise support to a Jewish community under siege
.

Head of Janus, Vatican museum, Rome

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken and his counterpart, Britain’s Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab, visited Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu this week to offer help in building on the ceasefire with Hamas.

Both Blinken and Raab declared themselves committed to Israel’s security. Both governments have also condemned the antisemitism running rampant in their countries.

These are vapid bromides. For neither the British government nor the Biden administration acknowledges that the war against Israel and the war against the Jewish diaspora form an indivisible line of bigotry, which they themselves unwittingly help maintain.

The tsunami of antisemitism continues to inundate the west. In America, antisemitic acts reportedly rose by 80 percent this month, and in Britain by at least 500 percent. More than 17,000 variations of “Hitler was right” have recently appeared on Twitter.

In Britain, after the actors’ union Equity called on its members to join last Saturday’s anti-Israel march in London at which demonstrators burned Israeli flags and displayed antisemitic slogans, Jewish actors have said they are beginning to hide their Stars of David at auditions.

There are many non-Jews who are as horrified as they are bewildered by this evil that has overtaken their society. It is indeed astounding in its scope and scale.

For it is effectively a takeover of millions of western minds by Soviet-style brainwashing, in which the Palestinian perpetrators of murderous, exterminatory antisemitism are regarded as oppressed and dispossessed while their Israeli victims are labeled Nazi oppressors — and diaspora Jews are accused of backing “pogroms” in “Palestine”.

This madness urgently needs to be fought by those who help make the cultural weather. It’s not enough for politicians to promise support to a Jewish community that’s under siege. They need to call out the broadcasters and newspapers peddling Palestinian propaganda and incitement in the guise of journalism.

They need to tell people that Israel stands for law, justice and human rights while the Palestinians stand for their negation.

They need to tell people about the Palestinians’ Nazi-style antisemitism, about how they teach their children to hate Jews and steal their land, and about how the two-state solution forms part of their “strategy of stages” to destroy Israel altogether.

Most people have no idea about any of this. Because they never hear these truths being told, they believe that the Palestinians are helpless and Israel behaves badly. So the Israel-haters get a free pass for their lies.

That’s why the British and American governments need to say that this obscene agenda is what’s driving the upsurge in antisemitism.

Alas, they persist instead with a doctrine of moral equivalence, which itself perpetuates the falsehoods and helps empower and incentivise Palestinian aggression.

Thus, Dominic Raab urged an end to the “cycle of violence” via a two-state solution. But there is no “cycle of violence” in which both sides are culpable. There is instead a permanent Palestinian war of annihilation against Israel, which seeks to defend itself against such attack.

President Joe Biden was correct when he said “you’re not going to get peace until Israel is recognised as an independent Jewish state.” But although he may be well disposed towards Israel, his administration most certainly is not.

Thus, Blinken said the ceasefire must be used to address “underlying issues and challenges” beginning with the “grave” humanitarian situation in Gaza. Surely, he should begin instead with the gravest of all underlying issues — the Palestinians’ Jew-hatred and their strategy for destroying Israel?

America would rebuild relations with the Palestinians, he said, by re-opening a consulate in Jerusalem and giving millions in aid to help reconstruct Gaza.

But why is America rebuilding relations with a Palestinian Authority led by a man who venerates Hitler’s genocidal ally in the Middle East, Haj Amin al-Husseini, and which teaches Palestinian children to hate and murder Jews and steal their land?

And given that in supposedly destitute Gaza Hamas had constructed some 300 miles of underground military tunnels and fired more than 4,000 rockets at Israel, it is beyond absurd for Blinken to claim that the United States can somehow prevent future aid from being used for the same infernal ends.

At the core of Blinken’s whole approach is a rotten moral equivalence, illustrated by his lumping together Palestinian and Israeli casualties sustained in this month’s Gaza hostilities.

The Palestinian casualties — of which Israel says the vast majority were combatants —were caused entirely by Hamas aggression; the Israeli casualties were all the victims of that aggression. To draw an equivalence between the two is to diminish victimhood and sanitise aggression.

The seamless link between antisemitism and this morally bankrupt attitude towards the war against Israel has yet still wider implications.

For moral equivalence is also claimed between antisemitism and Islamophobia —illustrated by the Democratic Party only feeling able to condemn antisemitism by also condemning Islamophobia — and which results in those calling out Muslim antisemitism being denounced as “Islamophobes”.

The pernicious results of this moral confusion were recently demonstrated by an incident at a high school in the British city of Leeds.

The police were called to protect its head teacher, Mike Roper, after he said that the Palestinian flag was perceived by some as “a call to arms”. This resulted in protests at the school gates against Roper’s “racism” and “blatant Islamophobia”.

But Roper hadn’t criticised the Palestinians’ flag or their cause. He merely observed that some people viewed that flag and cause as a message of support for antisemitism and a call to arms against Jews, which he said it was never intended to be.

Roper was forced to grovel over something he didn’t even say. But the irony was that what he was falsely accused of saying was more true than what he did say.

recommended by: Leon Rozenbaum
For Palestinianism is indeed profoundly anti-Jewish. It’s not just predicated on the destruction of the State of Israel, but also on erasing the Jewish claim to the land.

It seeks to hijack and appropriate Jewish history to construct an artificial Palestinian identity. And it does this through ludicrous claims that the Palestinians, not the Jews, are the indigenous people of the land; through vandalising and stealing artefacts dating from the ancient kingdom of Israel unearthed on archaeological sites; and through denouncing Zionism — or Jewish self-determination — as racism.

Yet in the wake of the Leeds school debacle, the Muslim Council of Britain is now demanding a “safe space” in schools for this Palestinian narrative, which negates Jewish history and drives antisemitism.

Even more tellingly Irfan Chishti, an imam who works for the British government’s task force on tackling extremism, was filmed at a demonstration in Rochdale telling cheering crowds that non-Muslims at Jerusalem’s Al Aqsa mosque were “vile human beings” who were “desecrating” it.

Under Muslim rule, he said, Palestine had been peaceful, but Israel was a “terrorist state forcing terror upon our brothers and sisters”. He then asked “where is the modern-day Saladin,” as he called for those in the crowd who wanted to become mujahideen (“holy warriors”), and praised shahids (“martyrs”) who had “given their life for Palestine”.

The government has said his comments were “completely unacceptable” and that it will “take appropriate action”. Well, the only appropriate action is surely prosecution under Britain’s laws against incitement and support for terrorism. Are ministers really going to thus expose the hole at the heart of their strategy against Islamic extremism— the one signposted “Muslim antisemitism and support for Palestine”? This seems exceedingly unlikely.

Given all this, the chances of the British or American governments saying what needs to be said to counter the narrative of incitement and lies against the Jewish people, now running so strongly through their Muslim communities and their “progressive” echo chamber, are precisely nil.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Anti-Semitism Scandal: Jewish Woman Breaks Silence on Children’s Book Society

Anti-Semitism Scandal: Jewish Woman Breaks Silence on Children’s Book Society

United With Israel Staff


April Powers said that there are Jewish employees of the Society of Children’s Book Writers and Illustrators “who have also been harassed and trolled relentlessly.”

As the dust settled on the Society of Children’s Book Writers and Illustrators, its former diversity officer, April Powers, thanked friends on Tuesday for supporting her in the face of an anti-Semitism scandal that rocked the organization.

“Thank you all so much for your support in this terrifying moment for me and my family. For clarity, the SCBWI did not fire me or ask me to resign. There are good, kind people who work and volunteer there, many of whom are from marginalized, minority, or underrepresented backgrounds (including Jewish) themselves-who have also been harassed and trolled relentlessly,” Powers wrote on Facebook.

“While there is certainly more to this story, particularly horrific unmasked antisemitism outside of the SCBWI, I cannot comment further at this time other than to say I chose to resign because of the distraction this was causing. Your words and actions in support mean the world to me. Thank you. Thank you,” she added.

The story began on June 10. Following a spike in anti-Semitic violence around the world, the SCWBI issued a statement written by Powers condemning anti-Semitism. The statement made no reference to Israel, the Palestinians or the Mideast conflict.

The statement acknowledged that Jews “have the right to life, safety, and freedom from scapegoating and fear.”

Noting a sharp rise in anti-Semitic violence, the statement said, “Silence is often mistaken for acceptance and results in the perpetration of more hatred and violence against different types of people.”

Palestinians and Muslims denounced SCBWI because the statement failed to also acknowledge “Islamophobia.” One of the organization’s members, Razan Abdin-Adnanin, claimed her comments posted on Facebook and Twitter were “erased” and “deleted” by Powers, who she also accused of blocking her on social media.

On Sunday, SCBWI executive director Lin Oliver issued an apology to Muslim and Palestinian members.

“SCBWI acknowledges the pain our actions have caused to our Muslim and Palestinian members and hope that we can heal from this moment,” Oliver said.

Oliver also announced that certain seats on the SCBWI’s Equity and Inclusion committee would be set aside for Muslims. The message also included an apology from Powers, who said removing “anti-Palestinian and anti-Israeli posts” from social media had been a mistake.

But the Post-Millenial reports that Abdin-Adnani’s comments in fact warranted removal.

Abdin-Adnani, it said, replied on Twitter to the original June 10 statement “with anti-Israel propaganda, justifying violence against Jews worldwide by hurling baseless accusations against the Jewish state. She also demanded that the organization issue a statement about Islamophobia in her tweets replying to SCBWI’s statement on antisemitism, essentially ‘all lives mattering’ the issue.”

According to the Post-Millenial, Abdin-Adnani “harassed the account so often that the statement condemning antisemitism had to be deleted and reposted 4 times before the Chief Equity and Inclusion Officer April Powers blocked Abdin-Adnani.”

Actress Debra Messing called out Abdin-Adnani. After several back-and-forth-tweets, Messing wrote: “A black Jewish woman, April Powers, was FIRED ( forced to resign) as Equality Director because an anti-semite hated her statement of condemnation against anti-Semitism.”


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


„Wychowawcy ofiarnie szli razem z dziećmi”. Zapowiedź Marszu Pamięci 22 Lipca 2021


„Wychowawcy ofiarnie szli razem z dziećmi”. Zapowiedź Marszu Pamięci 22 Lipca 2021

Żydowski Instytut Historyczny


– Tegoroczny Marsz dedykujemy nauczycielom. W ekstremalnych warunkach getta nie stracili wiary w wartość edukacji i wzorców moralnych, które starali się przekazać uczniom. Do ostatnich dni przed wywózką towarzyszyli swoim podopiecznym w nauce czytania i pisania czy przygotowaniach do matury. Wielu z nich poszło wraz z uczniami na Umschlagplatz – o bohaterach Marszu Pamięci 22 Lipca mówi dyrektor Żydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego im. Emanuela Ringelbluma, Monika Krawczyk. Marsz rozpocznie się o godz. 18:00 pod pomnikiem Umschlagplatz przy ul. Stawki 10.

Po raz dziesiąty w Marszu Pamięci 22 Lipca wspominamy blisko 300 tysięcy żydowskich mieszkańców Warszawy, którzy w lecie 1942 roku zostali wywiezieni do obozu zagłady w Treblince.

Szczególnie przywołamy pamięć o nauczycielach związanych z grupą Oneg Szabat, takich jak: Abraham Lewin, Emanuel Ringelblum, Eliasz Gutkowski, Izrael Lichtensztajn, czy też o Stefanii Szwajgier, kierowniczce gimnazjum dla dziewcząt przy ul. Długiej 55, a także polskich nauczycielach, którzy udzielali pomocy przyjaciołom z drugiej strony muru.

Wspólnie przejdziemy symboliczną trasę „od śmierci do życia”. Rozpocznie się ona o godz. 18:00 pod pomnikiem Umschlagplatz przy ul. Stawki 10, a zakończy przy ul. Stare Nalewki, w pobliżu Ogrodu Krasińskich, gdzie stanie specjalnie przygotowana na to wydarzenie instalacja artystyczna „Ławki” zaprojektowana przez architekta Jakuba Szczęsnego, którą będzie można oglądać do 31 sierpnia br.

– Na tym obszarze przed wojną znajdowało się wiele szkół żydowskich funkcjonujących w ramach powszechnego systemu oświaty. Były też w okolicy liczne chedery, Talmud-Tory, jesziwy i inne miejsca, gdzie trwała żydowska edukacja religijna. – zaznacza dyrektor ŻIH, Monika Krawczyk.

Na zakończenie Marszu przygotowaliśmy – we współpracy z Instytutem Mieczysława Wajnberga – premierę utworu elektroakustycznego ”Nie zaszło u nas nic nowego” na podstawie „Dziennika” Abrahama Lewina w kameralnej obsadzie na skrzypce (Maria Sławek), flet (Ania Karpowicz), głos (Marta Grzywacz) i syntezator (Krzysztof Kozłowski). 

Żydowski Instytut Historyczny przygotował także specjalnie na tę okazję audiobook Dziennika Abrahama Lewina. W nagraniu wyreżyserowanym przez Agnieszkę Olsten usłyszymy aktora Jerzego Radziwiłowicza.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com