Swords of Iron, Israel at War – Day 185 – UPDATE 8.4.24
Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com
IDF explains mistaken deaths of WCK aid workers, consequences in placeYONAH JEREMY BOB
In a statement on Friday, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) on Friday explained the series of errors which led it to mistakenly kill seven World Central Kitchens aid workers on Monday night.
According to the IDF, there were seven different actions points in the incident regarding attacking the three WCK.
There were multiple suspicious actions which the drone unit saw.
The drone unit said it saw a Hamas terrorist climb onto one of the trucks and fire in the air at what it called action point two.
According to the IDF, this tactic is frequent and is used by Hamas to send signals to other Hamas fighters in the area regarding his position.
At action point three, the convoy split up.
At action point four, the convoy entered a hangar which obscured which vehicles might be going in and out and who might be in the vehicles compared to who was in the vehicles before entering the hangar.
In the first four action points, the IDF drone unit refrained from attacking the aid trucks because they questioned their commanders and were ordered by Division 162 Brig. Gen. Itzik Cohen not to, despite a suspicion of Hamas terrorists being involved.
At the fifth action point, the aid trucks had left the hangar.
As the events developed, the IDF tried to call the aid workers involved in the field and was unable to reach them.
Next, the IDF called the WCK headquarters. The WCK headquarters tried to call its own aid workers in the field who also did not answer.
When vehicles left the hangar, the IDF drone unit believed that this was not the same vehicles and believed that these were Hamas vehicles.
According to the IDF, attacking the trucks after all of this was a mistaken identity issue, but could not lead to criminal charges.
Accordingly, the drone unit believed that the order not to attack no longer applied.
Around a kilometer later, the drone unit believed it had the right to engage the trucks.
Also, the drone unit had thermal imaging that did not see the WCK aid worker sign posted on the roof of the trucks.
When the drone unit attacked three times, it believed that the “coast was clear” completely to attack what it believed were clearly Hamas targets.
The IDF said that even though this could not be a criminal issue, that a colonel and major involved in the attack were being fired from their positions as they still could have refrained from attacking based on a general worry that it could still be aid workers.
Likewise, Cohen and his commanding officer, Maj. Gen. Yoel Finkleman were censured for not having standing orders which would have infused even grater restraint within their troops.
Further, the IDF said that only an attack on the first truck could be somewhat more justified because only there had the drones positively identified a Hamas terrorists, whereas the suspicions about Hamas terrorists in the second and third trucks were based on more on conjecture regarding the character pf the trucks themselves.
Regarding identifying the trucks themselves, the IDF said that a source of complexity was the Toyota pickup trucks involved which usually are a characteristic of Hamas and were not usually used by the aid workers.
The IDF was uncertain about what happened to any of the Hamas terrorists who might have weaved in or out of the incident.
The IDF said it had presented the findings to the WCK and were still in a process of answering questions, and were not sure how the organization would respond.
Following the incident, the WCK suspended all operations in the Gaza Strip and appeared to be leaning to permanently ending all operations.
Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com
ILTV News Flash – War Day 180, April 03, 2024ILTV Israel News
Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com
Mideast Intricacies amid Strategic Power Competition : Israel at War – Jerusalem Studio 845
For a rare moment earlier this week, all of the world’s leading powers were almost on the same page. This occurred when the UN Security Council voted for a Ramadan ceasefire, with Russia and China, Britain, France and others in favor and the US abstaining.
Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com
Israel’s HIGH-STAKES West Bank Counterterrorism OperationsTBN Israel
TBN Israel’s Yair Pinto reports of the rising terrorism threat in Judea and Samaria, otherwise known as the West Bank. Pinto reveals how Iran wages its war of attrition against Israel through weapons smuggling and funding terror groups, and how Israel’s IDF and Shin Bet are cracking down on these terrorist cells at Palestinian universities. Pinto also sits down with Oded Revivi, Mayor of Efrat, a Jewish settlement in Judea and Samaria, about the city’s increased security measures. Stay up-to-date with the latest developments here on TBN Israel.
Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com