Archives

IDF prepares for Rafah offensive; Netanyahu rebukes world leaders’ short-memory

IDF prepares for Rafah offensive; Netanyahu rebukes world leaders

TV7 Israel News


1) Israeli Premier Benjamin Netanyahu rejects foreign calls for early elections during a time of war.
2) IDF Chief of General Staff Lieutenant General Herzi Halevi stresses that failure to eradicate Hamas, including in Rafah, would be a mistake.
3) U.S. President Joe Biden voices support for Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, referring to his unprecedented criticism of Israel as “a good speech”.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Netanyahu Says Schumer Call for Israel Election Was Inappropriate

Netanyahu Says Schumer Call for Israel Election Was Inappropriate

Reuters and Algemeiner Staff


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a press conference with Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and Cabinet Minister Benny Gantz in the Kirya military base in Tel Aviv, Israel, Oct. 28, 2023. Photo: ABIR SULTAN POOL/Pool via REUTERS

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told CNN on Sunday that U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s speech in which he urged new elections in Israel was “totally inappropriate.”

In a speech on the Senate floor on Thursday, Schumer, a longtime supporter of Israel and the highest-ranking Jewish U.S. elected official, called for new elections in Israel and said Netanyahu was an obstacle to peace.

“I think what he said is totally inappropriate. It’s inappropriate to go to a sister democracy and try to replace the elected leadership there,” Netanyahu said in the CNN interview.

The speech reflected growing frustration in Washington with Netanyahu, his management of the war with Hamas, and the civilian death toll in Gaza. International criticism of US support for Israel has mounted due to the death toll in the coastal enclave, where Hamas terrorists have been criticized for embedding themselves among the civilian population and using civilians as human shields.

Schumer said it would be a “grave mistake” for Israel to reject a two-state solution and urged negotiators in the Israel-Gaza conflict to do everything possible to secure a ceasefire, free hostages and get aid into Gaza.

President Joe Biden said on Friday that Schumer’s comments echoed the concerns of many Americans, describing the remarks as a “good speech.”

Still, White House spokesperson John Kirby said on Sunday that Biden believed it was up to Israel to make its own decisions about internal politics.

“We respect the sovereignty of the Israeli people,” Kirby told Fox News Sunday. “The president believes it’s up to the Israeli people and the Israeli government to determine if and when there’s going to be new elections.”

Schumer did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Netanyahu’s reaction to his speech.

In Israel, Netanyahu dismissed international pressure on Sunday and said Israel’s military would push into Rafah, the last Hamas stronghold in Gaza, after more than five months of war.

Republican congressman Michael McCaul, who leads the House of Representatives Foreign Relations Committee, criticized Schumer’s remarks, comparing them to an effort to topple Israel’s government.

“You don’t talk about toppling a government in a democracy,” McCaul told Fox News Sunday, calling Schumer’s remarks “very inappropriate” and “embarrassing.”

Schumer also criticized Palestinians who support Islamist group Hamas, and said Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas also should step aside.

Schumer raised the possibility of Washington using its leverage if Israel does not change course. Still, he did not go as far as suggesting a step some Democrats advocate: introducing legislation to make easing the humanitarian crisis in Gaza a condition for the U.S. providing more weapons to Israel.

“It’s indicative of now the split in the Democratic Party … and I think what you’re seeing is a pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel faction in the Democratic Party,” McCaul said.

Israel launched its military offensive in Gaza after Hamas-led Palestinian terrorists launched a surprise invasion of the Jewish state on Oct. 7, massacring 1,200 people and kidnapping 253 others before Israeli forces repelled the onslaught.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


All the News in Gaza Is Coming From Hamas

All the News in Gaza Is Coming From Hamas

Jacki Alexander


Palestinian fighters from the armed wing of Hamas take part in a military parade to mark the anniversary of the 2014 war with Israel, near the border in the central Gaza Strip, July 19, 2023. REUTERS/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa

There is no freedom of the press in Gaza. If journalists don’t follow Hamas’ guidelines for press coverage, they are arrested, beaten, and/or tortured.

These are not controversial statements; they are based on reports from Freedom House, Reporters Without Borders, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International.

When journalist Hajar Harb revealed doctors in Hamas’ Gaza Health Ministry were arranging illegal medical transfers out of Gaza for Palestinians who did not require medical treatment — and profiting off of them — she was harassed and threatened by both the police and by the doctors.

Fouad Jarada was arrested for writing a Facebook post critical of Hamas’ patron, Qatar. He was beaten and whipped during his detention.

Ismael el-Bozom was arrested and beaten for “drawings and writings critical of Hamas” that were uploaded to his Facebook account.

Amer Balousha was arrested for “Misuse of Technology” — a crime that does not exist in Palestinian law — for daring to post about corruption among Hamas leaders. He was beaten in custody and told, “It’s forbidden to write against Hamas, we will shoot you.”

In 2014, the Foreign Press Association called out Hamas for having “harassed, threatened or questioned [foreign reporters] over stories or information they have reported through their news media or by means of social media.” This claim was later confirmed by a Hamas official, who explained, “the security agencies would go and have a chat with these people. They would give them some time to change their message, one way or another.”

The journalists’ crime? Reporting on terrorists firing rockets from civilian areas, which meant to Hamas that these reporters were “collaborating with the occupation [i.e. Israel].”

That’s also why Al Jazeera immediately stopped an interview last year with an elderly Palestinian woman in Gaza who explained that the lack of food and water in Gaza wasn’t a result of aid not coming in. “All the aid reaches the Gaza Strip … Hamas takes everything to their homes,” she said.

Hamas not only stifles the messaging coming out of Gaza, but actively works to shape the narrative in its favor.

Just this week, Uvda — Israel’s premier investigative journalism show — divulged new information gleaned from Hamas’ plan for the October 7 attack. The New York Times previously reported on the plan, code-named “Jericho Wall,” but Uvda went further and revealed that Hamas always intended for journalists to “join the brigades and broadcast the operation in real time.”

Of course they did. In addition to providing important propaganda for domestic consumption, this allowed them to reframe their massacre of Israeli civilians as a heroic act of decolonization. Or, as they stated in their 18-page manifesto: “Operation Al-Aqsa Flood on Oct. 7 was a necessary step and a normal response…”

Hamas is well aware of the power of narrative, and is actively trying to impact public opinion in their favor. And, it’s working.

With the international media largely unable to access Gaza during the war, more outlets and individuals are relying on “independent” voices broadcasting on social media.

But true independent voices are precisely the ones that Hamas has spent the last two decades silencing. Those that are left, have simply changed their message.

So, when international media outlets utilize Gazan journalists, photojournalists, and freelancers — without the disclaimer that they are a mouthpiece for Hamas — they are complicit in spreading misinformation that has real world consequences for news consumers and for Jews far beyond Israel’s borders.

Global attacks against Jews and Jewish institutions are at an all-time high. The fuel fanning these flames is the inaccurate reporting about Israel, oftentimes based on Hamas’ narrative:

Famine. Genocide. Ethnic cleansing. Al-Ahli hospital. Stealing Palestinian organs.

These false accusations have led to attacks on Jews and Jewish institutions from Tunisia to Dagestan. In America, antisemitic attacks are reaching “historic levels” according to FBI Director Christopher Wray — and that was four months ago.

Mainstream media organizations know that the news they are getting from Gaza is compromised. It’s tainted by Hamas’ oversight. Yet, they continue to amplify and legitimize these messages by giving them a platform, without even the bare minimum of a disclaimer.

So, the next time you read or watch news coming out of Gaza, here is your disclaimer: Hamas approves this message.


The author is the CEO and President of HonestReporting.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Sword of Iron, Israel at War – Day 160 – UPDATE 14.03.2024

Sword of Iron, Israel at War – Day 160 – UPDATE 14.03.2024

TV7 Israel News



Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Anti-Semitism : Spillover from the Israel-Hamas War? Israel at War – Jerusalem Studio 842

Anti-Semitism : Spillover from the Israel-Hamas War? Israel at War – Jerusalem Studio 842


TV7 Israel News


The scourge of Anti-Semitism long preceded Zionism and indeed was a major factor in generating this movement, when the visionary Theodor Herzl considered the implication of the Dreyfus Affair.

But lately, both organizations and individuals objecting to specific policies of certain Israeli governments have crossed the line to embrace Jewish hatred in all of its ugly forms. Jews around the world who have nothing to do with Israeli military operations, either defensive or offensive, are victimized, as if their religion makes them synonymous with the Jewish State.

How serious is this problem in the United States, Europe and elsewhere? Joining us for the discussion are:

Panel:
– Host : Jonathan Hessen : Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute
– Editor at Large : Amir Oren : Host of Watchmen Talk and Powers in Play
– Prof. Uri Rosenthal : former Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands
– Mr. Robert Silverman : Lecturer at Shalem College and Former President of the American Foreign Service Association

 


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com