Archives

Israel Daily News – September 19, 2023

Israel Daily News – September 19, 2023

ILTV Israel News


Netanyahu has arrived to a controversial New York. Saudi Arabia and the European Union have kicked off a new initiative promoting a solution to the israeli-palestinian conflict. And much more.

 


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com

 


Famed Chef Ina Garten Shares Rosh Hashanah Recipes, Recalls Baking Challah as a Newlywed

Famed Chef Ina Garten Shares Rosh Hashanah Recipes, Recalls Baking Challah as a Newlywed

Shiryn Ghermezian


Ina Garten making Israeli salad. Photo: YouTube screenshot

Acclaimed Jewish chef and cookbook author Ina Garten this week shared recipes for five dishes to serve on Rosh Hashanah, as well as tips about prepping them ahead of time before the start of the Jewish holiday on Friday night.

“Even if you didn’t grow up celebrating the Jewish New Year, these classic recipes are still so comforting and delicious,” Garten said in an Instagram post. She also shared pictures of all the dishes: bourbon honey cake, matzo ball soup, brisket with onions and leeks, orange-roasted rainbow carrots, and challah. All the recipes are provided in the link shared on her Instagram page.

Garten and her husband, Jeffrey Garten, are both Jewish, and Jeffrey’s father was a World War II veteran. The author and host of the Food Network cooking show Barefoot Contessa said her husband loves the bourbon honey cake and that challah “was one of the first things I ever made for him after we were married.”



Ina, whose maiden name is Rosenberg, was born in Brooklyn, New York, but was raised in Stamford, Connecticut. She told the website The Nosher in 2020 that, growing up, she was not allowed in the kitchen and did not enjoy her mother’s cooking. Her love of being in the kitchen only developed after she got married at the age of 20.

“The minute I got married, I really started cooking,” she said, before adding,”I think a lot of what I do is creating what I always wanted, rather than a memory of something.”

She also told the website that her favorite Jewish comfort food is challah French toast flavored with saffron and that she loves potato pancakes, which are traditionally made on the Jewish holiday of Chanukkah.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


How Israel’s Supreme Court can strengthen democracy

How Israel’s Supreme Court can strengthen democracy

ROBERT SILVERMAN


Chief Justice of Israel’s Supreme Court Esther Hayut at the hearing of the government’s “reasonableness” law, at the Supreme Court in Jerusalem, Sept. 12, 2023. Photo by Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.

On Tuesday, Israel’s Supreme Court convened amid an atmosphere of heightened political tension to hear petitions asking it to strike down a recently-passed Knesset law. No ruling is expected imminently, but political compromise proposals by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and others indicate a growing concern with leaving the matter in the hands of the court. 

Part of the new Israeli government’s judicial reform package (and the only element enacted thus far), this law bars judges from using the “reasonableness standard,” a defined principle in Israeli jurisprudence with established criteria, and one previously used to overrule as “unreasonable” both legislation and certain kinds of executive actions. Both sides have taken to the streets to argue for or against these laws’ effects on Israel’s democracy.

What may seem like dry material for a law review article on justiciability to outsiders is a hot-button political debate in Israel. Yet there is a solution available to the court that allows both sides to win in a way that also strengthens Israel’s democracy.

Israel’s Marbury v. Madison Moment

“It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is.” —  Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. at 177

Israel is not the first democracy to face a political crisis over a supreme court’s ability to review and strike down legislation. The United States, the world’s oldest democracy, faced just such a crisis in the second generation after its founding, in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1805).

The story behind the Marbury case illuminates a court’s ability to establish its supremacy in interpreting the law, while at the same time limiting itself vis-à-vis the political branches of government. Thus it’s worthwhile to tell the story behind the Marbury case.

On March 4, 1801, Thomas Jefferson was inaugurated as the third president of the United States after a bitterly contentious election. Two days before, outgoing president John Adams, Jefferson’s opponent in the race, had appointed nearly 60 of his supporters to federal positions and, on its last day in office, the outgoing Congress had confirmed the appointments en masse.

Jefferson refused to recognize these last-minute appointments, relying on the technicality that some of the commission documents had not been delivered to the appointees before the turn-over of administration on March 4. One of the appointments was of Maryland financier William Marbury as justice of the peace (a low-level judge) for the District of Columbia. 

Marbury then sued Jefferson’s Secretary of State James Madison to force the new administration to honor his appointment (at the time, part of the Secretary of State’s job was to impress the Great Seal of State on official documents and have them delivered to the intended recipients). 


ROBERT SILVERMAN – A former U.S. diplomat and president of the American Foreign Service Association, Robert Silverman is a lecturer at Shalem College, senior fellow at the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security and president of the Inter Jewish Muslim Alliance.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Israel Daily News – September 12, 2023

Israel Daily News – September 12, 2023

ILTV Israel News


President Biden and PM Netanyahu set to talk at a UN meeting, not at the White House. The High Court convened today for a ruling on the reasonableness bill. And an US-Iran deal making headlines. And much more.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Abbas Spokesman Doubles Down on Palestinian Leader’s Antisemitic Speech Despite Global Condemnation

Abbas Spokesman Doubles Down on Palestinian Leader’s Antisemitic Speech Despite Global Condemnation

Andrew Bernard


UN Photo/Cia Pak Mahmoud Abbas, President of the State of Palestine, addresses the 74th session of the United Nations General Assembly’s General Debate. (26 September 2019)

The spokesman for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas doubled down on the legitimacy of his boss’s recent speech, which has drawn international outrage for its litany of antisemitic conspiracy theories and claims that Nazi leader Adolf Hitler did not hate the Jews as a people.

Nabil Abu Rudeineh claimed on Thursday that Abbas’ “position on this issue is clear and documented” and that the Palestinian president condemns the Holocaust. He added that Abbas’ remarks “on the Jewish issue” were based on quotes “from the writings of Jewish and American historians and writers and others” and “not considered a denial in any way of the Holocaust.”

However, neither Abbas nor his spokesman issued an apology, instead reserving blame for those who criticized the speech.

“We express our strong disapproval and condemnation of this frenzied campaign just for quoting academic and historical writings,” Rudeineh said, according to Palestinian media reports.

However, neither Abbas nor his spokesman issued an apology, instead reserving blame for those who criticized the speech.

“We express our strong disapproval and condemnation of this frenzied campaign just for quoting academic and historical writings,” Rudeineh said, according to Palestinian media reports.

Abbas has received global condemnation for a recent antisemitic speech that he delivered late last month to the Revolutionary Council of Fatah, the political party he leads. The address — which the Middle East Media Research Institute flagged and posted video of last weekend — was riddled with antisemitic conspiracies and claims that antisemitism was not a cause of the Holocaust. Among the controversial comments, Abbas claimed that Nazi leader Adolf Hitler did not hate Jews as a people but rather because of their dealings with money as usurers.

“They say that Hitler killed the Jews for being Jews, and that Europe hated the Jews because they were Jews,” Abbas said. “Not true. It was clearly explained that [the Europeans] fought [the Jews] because of their social role, and not their religion. Several authors wrote about this. Even Karl Marx said this was not true. He said that the enmity was not directed at Judaism as a religion, but to Judaism for its social role.”

Abbas went on to claim that Hitler said he “fought” the Jews because “they were dealing with usury and money,” adding that the dictator of Nazi Germany “hated” Jews because they were engaged in sabotage.” He also said that the Holocaust “was not about Semitism and antisemitism.”

Rudeineh wasn’t the only Palestinian official to lambast critics of Abbas rather than Abbas himself over the speech.

“The European and American position on President Mahmoud Abbas’ speech, which was taken out of context, is reprehensible and unjust,” said Rawhi Fattouh, chairman of the Palestinian National Council, according to Israeli and Palestinian press reports. “He [Abbas] explained that there is a suspicious misinformation campaign led by manufactured media, and false propaganda based on quotes by foreign writers and historians, and that the position of President Mahmoud Abbas is known, consistent, and clear and does not accept doubt or interpretation that he is against the Nazi Holocaust, and that he rejects antisemitism [sic].”

Earlier this week, when news of Abbas’ speech spread, Jewish groups, Israeli officials, and foreign diplomats roundly condemned it. As the week went on, however, the international condemnation continued to roll in.

The European Union on Thursday issued a statement saying that Abbas’ speech “contained false and grossly misleading remarks about Jews and antisemitism,” and that his remarks “trivialize [the] Holocaust and thereby fuel antisemitism and are an insult to the millions of victims of the Holocaust and their families.”

The EU added, however, that perhaps the real victim was Abbas himself, saying that the speech might “play into the hands of those who do not want a two-state solution [to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict], which President Abbas has repeatedly advocated for.”

During Abbas’ tenure as president, he rejected a comprehensive Israeli peace offer in 2008 that, according to Palestinian officials, would have given the Palestinians even more territory than the full area of the West Bank and Gaza.

On Friday, the mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, posted an open letter to Abbas stripping him of the city’s highest honor, the Grand Vermeil medal, which she awarded him in 2015.

“You recently justified the extermination of the Jews of Europe during the Second World War with a clear desire to deny the genocide to which the Jewish populations of Europe were victims at the hands of the Nazi regime and its allies,” Hidalgo wrote. “I condemn with the greatest firmness your remarks. No cause can justify [Holocaust] revisionism and denial.”

Hidalgo said that because Abbas’ comments were “contrary to our universal values and the historical truth of the Shoah,” he could no longer avail himself of the award.

European Jewish groups including Crif, which is the umbrella organization for French Jews, and the European Jewish Congress welcomed Hidalgo’s decision to revoke the medal.

American officials in the US Congress and the Biden administration have also rebuked Abbas for his remarks.

Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) on Thursday posted on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, that Abbas was “a moral disgrace.”

“The so-called ‘moderate’ Mahmoud Abbas denies the antisemitism of Adolf Hitler, falsely claiming that Hitler ‘fought the Jews because they were dealing with usury and money,’ Torres wrote. “With ‘moderates’ like these, who needs extremists? There is and has long been a deep rot of antisemitism at the core of Mahmoud Abbas, whose Jew-hatred and corruption have only served to perpetuate the suffering of his own people while lining his own pockets.”

Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) also lambasted Abbas for what he described as the leader’s dismal record of governance over the Palestinian Authority and his failure to hold elections since he took office in 2005.

“From the guy who can’t hold an election (been 17 years) in his own territory as he would lose to a terrorist organization,” Moskowitz said. “Part of the [Palestinian Authority] that turned down several peace deals. Yet now, he is a Hitler expert? Instead of rewriting the Holocaust, he should be helping his people.”

Abbas’ comments also drew a rare rebuke, albeit an indirect one, from the United Nations Secretariat, with Under-Secretary-General Miguel Moratinos saying that he condemned “all expressions and manifestations of antisemitism including denial of the Holocaust or distortion of historical facts regardless of the motivation and by whomsoever iterated.”

Moratinos cited Abbas by name only in referencing that he “acknowledge[d] the statement issued by the office of Palestinian Pres. Mahmoud Abbas clarifying his position on this matter.”

Abbas is currently slated to address the UN on Sept. 21 at the opening of the general debate of the 78th session of the General Assembly.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com