Archives

Israel Daily News – August 3, 2023

Israel Daily News – August 3, 2023

ILTV Israel News


Pittsburgh synagogue shooter and white supremacist Rober Bowers recievs the death penalty. And pro-Israel speaker and influencer Naftali Hananya speaks about global Anti-Semitism in light of the Bowers death sentence. In other news, Herzi Halevi, the IDF chief of staff visits the Lebanon border, amid the Hezbollah tensions. And much more.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Israeli minister: ‘High Court is breaking the law’ with incapacitation law

Israeli minister: ‘High Court is breaking the law’ with incapacitation law

TROY O. FRITZHAND


Multiple government ministers said that they would ignore the High Court if it strikes down the incapacitation law.
.

High Court hears petitions on against the incapacitation law on August 3, 2023. /  (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM)

Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu of Otzma Yehudit said on Thursday that if the High Court of Justice struck down the Incapacitation Law, the government will not respect the ruling.

“They do not respect the sovereignty of the people,” he said. “The High Court is breaking the law… we will have to ask ourselves how we deal with lawbreakers in suits.”

A number of members from the coalition have already spoken out against the potential of it being struck down with National Missions Minister Orit Struck from the Religious Zionism Party telling Ynet that “If the High Court rejects the Incapacitation Law, it is leading itself in a mad dash to the abyss. It will have an even greater impact on our duty to reform the judicial system.”

“The High Court is breaking the law.”Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu

This comes as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has yet to publicly confirm that he will respect High Court decisions during his runs on American television.

Opposition leader Yair Lapid tweeted in response to Eliyahu on Thursday morning that “A minister who declares that they will not accept a High Court ruling cannot continue to serve as a minister even for a minute; A government that will not obey the law and the court is an illegal government.”

PRIME MINISTER Benjamin Netanyahu and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir are among cabinet ministers attending a state budget meeting, earlier this year. (credit: YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)

What is the incapacitation law?

All of this comes as the High Court of Justice is set to hear petitions today on invalidating the amendment passed to the Basic Law: The Government that gives Netanyahu immunity from conflict of interest claims.

The hearing could be a prelude to how the court decides to rule in its September hearing set to discuss the Law to Cancel the Reasonableness Clause, as it pertains to how the court sees its ability to rule on Basic Laws, which they have steered away from in the past.

The law, which was passed in March, came amidst controversies surrounding the government’s planned judicial overhaul. Prior to its passing, Netanyahu had refrained from chiming in on the legislation out of fears of legal action and the possibility of Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara ruling him unfit to serve as prime minister due to his ongoing legal trials.

The law, known as the Incapacitation Law, stipulates that in order for a prime minister to be removed from office, 2/3 of the Knesset must vote to deem him or her unfit due to mental or physical health ailments.

Critics of the bill complained that it was personally tailored towards Netanyahu to allow him to avoid a conflict of interest agreement he signed in 2020.

Netanyahu, for his part, claimed that it was unreasonable that the prime minister could not offer his public insights on an issue that had over 100,000 Israelis protesting on the streets. As such, the law was passed and Netanyahu was able to intervene.

A number of petitions were quickly filed by opposition groups, including the one currently being debated in court by the Movement for Quality Government.

Last week, Baharav-Miara filed an opinion to the High Court asking it to strike down the law. In her filing, she wrote that the law was an abuse of power by the Knesset and that it was personally tailored to positively impact the prime minister’s personal legal situation.

This was the first time that an attorney-general argued in favor of striking down an aspect of a Basic Law, and if it does, many fear it could create a constitutional crisis in the country.

Due to Israel’s lack of a formal constitution, the High Court has viewed the Basic Laws as somewhat akin to one. They have acted in such a matter. However, with the two highly controversial amendments before the court in a short period of time, there is a possibility that they may create a new precedent to rule against them.

Netanyahu’s legal team responded to the attorney-general’s letter last week telling her that the court does not have the authority to rule against Basic Laws.

The court planned to hear arguments all day.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Israel Daily News – July 30, 2023

Israel Daily News – July 30, 2023

ILTV Israel News


A potential historic deal is reportedly in the works? Also in a recent survey by the PEW research center, Americans express overwhelming support for the critical security and defense relationship between the US and Israel. Furthermore, Benjamin Netanyahu sent a message to the US media. And much more


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Rebel Jewish coin dating to anti-Roman revolt discovered in Israel

Rebel Jewish coin dating to anti-Roman revolt discovered in Israel

JUDY SIEGEL-ITZKOVICH


A rare half-shekel coin dug up in the Ein Gedi nature reserve was inscribed with the words “The Holy Jerusalem” in Hebrew.
.

The silver coin, as found, showing the obverse face with the chalice in the center, and above it the letter “Aleph” marking Year 1 of the outbreak of the revolt, and the inscription “half-shekel”, the value of the coin. / (photo credit: Emil Aladjem, Israel Antiquities Authority)

A rare half-shekel silver coin from the first year of the First Jewish Revolt against the Romans about two millennia ago has been discovered in the Judean Desert. The rare coin, discovered in the area of the Ein Gedi nature reserve, had the words “The Holy Jerusalem” in ancient Hebrew on the coin’s face.

The coin, dated to 66/67 CE when the Second Temple was destroyed in Jerusalem, was found in the Judean Desert Survey led by the Israel Antiquities Authority together with the Heritage Ministry and the staff officer of the Civil Administration Archaeology Unit in Judea and Samaria carried out over the last six years with the aim of retrieving these ancient finds before the antiquity looters.

Recently, in the course of examining every cave and crack in the rock, Israel Antiquities Authority inspectors reached a cliff in a wadi near En Gedi when they came across the coin on the ground at the entrance of one of the caves.

One explanation for this find is that the Jerusalem-minted coin fell from the pocket of a rebel who escaped to the desert during the revolt – perhaps on his way to nearby En Gedi.

On one side of the coin, “The Holy Jerusalem” appears – the word “Holy” spelled without a vowel, reflecting the development of the writing on the coins that appeared later on in the Revolt as “The Holy Jerusalem” with the vowel. Three pomegranates are depicted on the center of the coin – a familiar symbol as it was adopted on the old Israeli lira coin that was currency in the State of Israel until 1980.
.

The Judean Desert Cave Survey. / (credit: Emil Aladjem, Israel Antiquities Authority)

On the other side of the coin, a chalice (goblet) is depicted, above which the letter “Aleph” appears marking the first year of the outbreak of the Revolt and the value “Half-Shekel.” The chalice is a characteristic symbol on Jewish coins in currency towards the end of the Second Temple period.

Jewish rebels minted their own coins

These coins were minted in the values of shekel and half-shekel at the time of the First Revolt of the Jews against the Romans in Judea between the years 66 to 70 CE. 

In line with the Torah commandment prohibiting the depiction of images, the Jews used vegetal motifs and cultic and religious symbols on their coins, while the pagan population depicted symbols such as animals and the portrait of the ruling emperors and the Greek language that was the common language employed at the time. 

As part of the Jewish defiance, and the creation of an internal “Jewish Revolt economy,” the rebels minted their own silver and bronze coins depicting Jewish symbols.

The rebels decided to use the archaic Hebrew script that was current several hundred years earlier at the time of the First Temple Period instead of the Greek script that was used by the population in the country and the region at the time of the Second Temple. 

The leaders of the Jewish Revolt decided to defy the rulers and to mint silver coins autonomously, using the Hebrew script and without the image of the ruling Emperor. It seems that the coins were minted in Jerusalem, possibly in the Temple area.

According to Yaniv David Levy, the Israel Antiquities Authority’s numismatic scholar, “coins from the first year of the Revolt such as this one, are rare. During the Second Temple period, Jewish pilgrims used to pay a Temple Tax in half-shekel coins.

For about 200 years, Tyrian-minted coins (tetradrachms from Tyre, which in the Roman Empire took on an unusual role as the medium of payment for the Temple tax in Jerusalem) made of fine silver and a status symbol in the region, were used for this contribution. 

In the course of the revolt the rebels minted alternative coins inscribed with “Shekel Israel,” “Half-Shekel,” and “Quarter-Shekel” coins. It seems that the rituals in the Temple continued during the revolt and these coins were now used by the rebels.

The silver coin as found, showing the reverse face with three pomegranates and the surrounding inscription “The Holy Jerusalem”. (credit: Emil Aladjem, Israel Antiquities Authority)

Amir Ganor, a director of the Judean Desert Survey and Excavation Project noted that “the find of the silver Year-One half-shekel in the course of a controlled archaeological activity is a rare event in Israel and in the Judean Desert in particular.

This find emphasizes the importance of the controlled professional survey of the whole area. Every new find contributes to the history of the people and the country. Were it not for the survey, the coin may have been found by antiquity looters and sold on the antiquity market for the highest price offered. Over the six years of the project, we have recorded over 800 caves and have found thousands of significant finds.”

Heritage Minister Rabbi Amichai Eliyahu added that “the exciting discovery brings further evidence of the deep and indisputable connection between the Jewish people and Jerusalem and the Land of Israel. This amazing find is another strong sign of our people’s roots in the Land of Israel.”

Israel Antiquities Authority director Eli Escusido concluded that the discovery of the half-shekel coin is yet another gift that we have bestowed on the Israeli nation – first-hand evidence of a turbulent period in the history of our people 2,000 years ago, in a period of extremity and discourse that divided the nation and led to destruction.

After two millennia, we have returned to our country, and Holy Jerusalem is again our capital. The find of the coin at these times, is a reminder for us of what happened in the past, teaching us the importance of working towards unity.”    


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Israeli Protests Were Decades in the Making; Now the Country Must Determine Its Future

Israeli Protests Were Decades in the Making; Now the Country Must Determine Its Future

Lev Stesin


David Ben-Gurion declares Israel’s independence, at the Tel Aviv Museum, May 14, 1948. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

The dramatic events in Israel are not just the result of proposed judicial reforms. They are not caused by the bill to eliminate application of the “reasonableness doctrine.” The reforms are the catalyst of the crisis, which has been slowly building over the past few decades, and finally erupted in full force with the legislative initiatives of the current government. Just like the bankruptcy process, so vividly described by Ernest Hemingway, it first occurred gradually and then suddenly. The genesis of the problem lies at the moment of Israel’s creation and the genius of Israel’s founding father, David Ben-Gurion.

From the destruction of the Second Temple until the creation of the State of Israel, Jews had not existed as one nation. The Jews of the Holy Land, on the eve of Israel’s declaration of independence in 1948, were a group of very different communities tied together by the history and the great catastrophe of the Holocaust. Ben-Gurion understood that very well. It was an issue that had to be successfully solved, even if temporarily, for the new state to win the war and survive in the inhospitable environment of the Middle East and the Cold War. The future first prime minister was one of the best students of history this world has witnessed, and he applied his knowledge to solve the problem to the best of his abilities.

By the end of the Second World War, it was clear that the most prosperous and successful form of state structure was a stable democracy. Not just a democracy, but one that can survive and grow without imploding, disintegrating, or becoming a tyranny of the majority. Yet the question of what democracy represents is not simple. Some would argue that it is a system of government that guarantees freedom to individuals under its jurisdiction. It does do that, but only indirectly.

Unless one believes in direct democracy, along the lines of the Ancient Greek city states, that guarantee is unattainable and practically destructive. A democracy is a complex written, or unwritten as is the case with Israel, agreement between diverse social, cultural, and economic groups. A democracy balances at times diverging interests of each of those groups, maintaining an equilibrium and stability necessary for any social structure to exist. That creates an environment that all groups want to maintain, because it benefits each group separately and all groups together. Personal freedoms are a direct byproduct of this very delicate balance of forces, even if one’s personal freedom is part of the written compact between the groups.

However, every stable democracy is different, because its contours depend on the groups comprising it. Israel is no exception. Back in 1948, Ben-Gurion faced daunting tasks: there were a myriad Jews of different cultural, social, and economic backgrounds comprising the nascent nation (if one believes Polish and Romanian Jews are similar, one really needs to wake up).

It is fashionable nowadays to accuse Ben-Gurion of making a tragic mistake by exempting the Haredim from military service, and, for all practical purposes, allowing them semi-autonomy. Ben-Gurion did not like that choice. Yet he understood that at that junction of Jewish history, he was obligated to make everyone, no matter how reluctant, part of the democracy of the new state.

The makeup of the Israeli people have been changing, and the old assumptions, the pillars of democracy, have started to crumble. The compact of 1948 was made with the Israeli people, but the Jewish state’s population has changed. In this regard, Israel’s situation is not unique. The United States is undergoing a very similar process. The American system of government, with its peculiar characteristics such as the Federal system and the Electoral College, was designed and worked very well for the people who for centuries called themselves Americans. But Americans have changed dramatically in the past 50 years, and the previous stability of American democracy is under enormous stress. In Israel’s case, the minority groups previously satisfied with the status quo are asking for more power due to many reasons, the demographic one being of great importance. The problem is they are not the majority, as the current government misleadingly claims. Yet, the old compact appears to be broken for good.

The old divide of Israel’s politics was about war and peace. It is clear, based on the makeup of the pro- and anti-reform camps, that this is no longer the case. The question of what Israel is, not even who is a Jew, is the new political divide. No matter if some or all proposed reforms pass, the crisis will only deepen. Historically, the societies finding themselves in situations similar to today’s Israel have found only a few options out of the crisis. One is the civil war. After blood is spilled, either the country falls apart or, exhausted by the strife, people find a new paradigm for coexistence. Fortunately, Israel is not ready for that. The other option is a dramatic political realignment with the clear majority, via a compromise with the minority, setting new parameters for the democracy, perhaps a constitution. Israel is back to the drawing board of 1948, but without the wisdom of Ben-Gurion.


The author lives and works in Silicon Valley, California. He is a founding member of San Francisco Voice for Israel.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com