Archive | 2017/11/25

ŻIH – Newsletter 23 -30 listopada 2017

ŻIH – Newsletter 23 -30 listopada 2017

ŻIH

 


WAŻNA INFORMACJA DLA OSÓB PLANUJĄCYCH ZWIEDZANIE WYSTAWY STAŁEJ
 
Szanowni Państwo!
 
Wystawa stała ”Czego nie mogliśmy wykrzyczeć światu” prezentowana w Żydowskim Instytucie Historycznym okazała się frekwencyjnym sukcesem. Przypominamy zatem, iż wymogi bezpieczeństwa nie pozwalają nam wpuszczać na wystawę więcej niż 70 osób na godzinę (po 35 osób co 30 minut).
 
Oprowadzanie po wystawie odbywa się dwa razy dziennie od poniedziałku do piątku: o godz. 11:00 po angielsku i o godz. 14:00 po polsku.
 
Wszystkie osoby pragnące nas odwiedzić proszone są o zakup biletu przez stronę www.tickets.jhi.pl
 Bardzo prosimy o uważne wpisywanie adresu mailowego, na który ma być wysłany bilet.
 
Uwaga: mail potwierdzający zakup może trafić do skrzynki SPAM.
 
Przypominamy, że do dnia 8 grudnia indywidualne zwiedzanie wystawy (bez przewodnika) jest bezpłatne.
 
Dziękujemy i zapraszamy!
ZAPRASZAMY NA WYSTAWĘ STAŁĄ „CZEGO NIE MOGLIŚMY WYKRZYCZEĆ ŚWIATU” POŚWIĘCONĄ TWÓRCOM I LOSOM PODZIEMNEGO ARCHIWUM GETTA WARSZAWY

Wystawa „Czego nie mogliśmy wykrzyczeć światu” to kluczowy punkt programu Oneg Szabat. Jego celem jest upowszechnianie wiedzy o Podziemnym Archiwum Getta Warszawy i upamiętnianie jego twórców – Emanuela Ringelbluma i grupę Oneg Szabat.
Tłomackie 3/5, siedziba Żydowskiego Instytutu im. Emanuela Ringelbluma i Stowarzyszenia Żydowski Instytut Historyczny w Polsce. Zapraszamy.
 
Program Oneg Szabat, zainicjowany z okazji 70 lecia ŻIH, realizowany jest przez Żydowski Instytut Historyczny im. Emanuela Ringelbluma oraz Stowarzyszenie Żydowski Instytut Historyczny w Polsce w ramach partnerstwa publiczno – prywatnego.
WE’D LIKE TO INVITE YOU TO THE PERMANENT EXHIBITION „WHAT WE WERE UNABLE TO SHOUT OUT TO THE WORLD”, DEDICATED TO THE UNDERGROUND ARCHIVE OF THE WARSAW GHETTO AND TO ITS CREATORS
 
The documents form the Underground Archive of the Warsaw Ghetto, founded by Emanuel Ringelblum, historian and social activist. He gathered together a group of people who documented the life and death of the Warsaw Ghetto. When they realized that the Ghetto will be liquidated, and themselves – along with others – will be transported to a death camp, they buried the documents in a basement of the Borokhov school at Nowolipki 68. They survived in hiding from 1946 and 1950, when the second part of the archives was found. The documents were rediscovered and recovered from the remains of the Ghetto only thanks to the fact that Hersz Wasser, one of the people who knew the location, survived the Holocaust.
 
The Oneg Szabat program, marking the 70th anniversary of the founding of the Jewish Historical Institute, is prepared by the Emanuel Ringelblum Jewish Historical Institute and the Association of the Jewish Historical Institute of Poland within the framework of a public-private partnership.
Agata Madejska | Ronit Porat | Anna Orłowska
MIEJSCE. TŁOMACKIE 3/5 
22 listopada 2017 – 4 marca 2018

Na zaproszenie Żydowskiego Instytutu Historycznego im. Emanuela Ringelbluma, artystki: Agata Madejska, Ronit Porat i Anna Orłowska stworzyły prace, w których odnoszą się do wybranych wątków związanych z historią budynku Instytutu oraz jego najbliższego otoczenia. 
Bodźcem do tych artystycznych rozważań jest zbudowany na miejscu Wielkiej Synagogi i przypominający o jej braku „Błękitny Wieżowiec”, w którego lustrzanej powierzchni odbija się stojący obok gmach ŻIH-u. 
SEMINARIUM NAUKOWE
Piłsudski i Żydzi. Dzieciństwo w Zułowie i Wilnie. W 150. rocznicę urodzin
28 listopada, godz.11:00
 
Jakie kontakty ze społecznością żydowską miała rodzina Piłsudskich i Ziuk osobiście w okresie jego dzieciństwa w Zułowie i Wilnie? Jakie wartości i standardy zachowań społecznych obowiązywały w rodzinie w odniesieniu do Żydów? W jaki sposób zmienił się stosunek Ziuka do Żydów pod wpływem rosyjskiej szkoły oraz rówieśników? – to pytania, na które odpowie prelegentka, aby uzyskać obraz przekonań, z jakimi młody Piłsudski wkraczał w dorosłe życie i które miały – przynajmniej w jakimś stopniu – wpływać na jego późniejsze decyzje polityczne.
 
Seminarium poprowadzi dr hab. Jolanta Żyndul (ŻIH)  

twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com

 


THE JEWISH GIRL

THE JEWISH GIRL

The Hans Christian Andersen Centre


H.C. Andersen

Among the other children in the charity school was a little Jewish girl, clever and good-in fact, the brightest of them all. But there was one class she could not attend, the one where religion was taught, for she was in a Christian school.

During the hour of this class, she had her geography book before her to study, or did her arithmetic, but the lessons were quickly learned, and then, though the book might still be open before her, she did not read from it; she listened. And the teacher soon noticed that she listened more intently than any of the rest.

“Study your book,” said the teacher, gently yet earnestly. But she looked back at him with her black, eager eyes, and when he put his questions to her as well as the rest he found she knew more than all the others. She had listened, understood, and kept his words.

Her father was a poor but honest man, and when he first brought her to the school he had given instructions that she should not be taught the Christian faith. But to send her from the room during the Scripture lesson might have given offense and raised various thoughts in the minds of the other children in the class, and so she remained. But this could not go on any longer.

So the teacher went to her father and explained that he must either take his daughter away from the school or consent to her becoming a Christian.

“I cannot bear to see those burning eyes, that sincere yearning thirst of the soul, so to speak, after the words of the Gospel,” he said.

Then her father burst into tears. “I know very little myself of our own faith,” he replied, “but her mother was a daughter of Israel, strong and steadfast in her faith, and on her deathbed I promised her that our child should never receive Christian baptism. That promise I must keep, for to me it is like a pact with God.”

So the little Jewish girl was taken away from the Christian school.

Years had passed.

In a humble household, in one of the smallest provincial towns of Jutland there was a maidservant, a poor girl of the Jewish faith; this was Sarah. Her hair was as black as ebony, and her eyes were dark yet full of brilliant light, such eyes as you see among the daughters of the East. And the expression in the face of the grown-up girl was still that of the child who sat on the schoolroom bench, listening with eager and wistful eyes.

Every Sunday the sound of the organ and the singing of the congregation sounded from the church, and the tones floated across the street and into the house where the Jewish girl attended diligently and faithfully to her work. “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy,” was her law; but her Sabbath was a day of labor to Christians, and only in her heart could she keep it holy. And that she believed was not enough.

But then the thought came to her soul, “What do days and hours matter in the sight of God?” and on the Sunday of the Christians she had her own undisturbed hour of devotion. Then if the sound of the organ and the singing came across to her as she stood behind the sink in the kitchen, even this became a quiet and consecrated spot. Then she would read the treasure and property of her own people, the Old Testament, and that alone; for she kept deep in her heart what her father had told the teacher and herself when she was taken from the school-the promise he had made to her dying mother, “that Sarah should not be baptized, nor forsake the faith of her fathers.” The New Testament was, and would forever remain, a sealed book to her; and yet she knew much of it, for it shone through the memories of her childhood.

One evening she was sitting in a corner of the living room while her master read aloud. She allowed herself to listen, for this was not the Gospel; no, he was reading from an old storybook, so she could remain. The master read to them of a Hungarian knight who was taken captive by a Turkish pasha and yoked with oxen to the plow. He was driven with lashes of the whip and suffered pain and thirst almost beyond endurance.

But at home his wife sold her jewels and mortgaged their castle and lands, while friends contributed large sums to help raise the almost unbelievable amount of money that was demanded as ransom. This finally was collected, and he was delivered from slavery and disgrace. Sick and suffering, he returned home.

But soon there resounded over the countryside the summons to a crusade against the foe of Christianity. The sick man heard the call and could have neither peace nor rest any longer; they had to lift him on his war horse. Then the blood rushed again to his cheeks, his strength seemed to return, and he rode forth to victory. The very pasha who had made him suffer pain and humiliation yoked to the plow became his captive. He was taken home to the castle dungeon, but before he had been there an hour the knight came to him and asked his prisoner, “What do you think now awaits you?”

“I know,” replied the Turk. “Retribution.”

“Yes, the retribution of a Christian,” said the knight. “The teachings of Christ tell us to forgive our enemies and love our fellow men. God is love! Go in peace to your home and loved ones, and be gentle and good to all who suffer.”

Then the prisoner burst into tears. “How could I have believed such a thing possible?” he cried. “I was certain I would have to suffer shame and torture, hence I took poison, and within a few hours I shall die. There is no remedy. But before I die, teach me the faith which is so full of such love and mercy; it is great and divine! In that faith let me die; let me die a Christian!” And his request was granted him.

That was the legend, the story that was read to them. All listened to it with close attention, but it sank deepest into the heart of her who sat in the corner, the servantmaid, Sarah, the Jewess. Large tears stood in her sparkling coal-black eyes while she sat there, as years ago on the school bench, and felt the greatness of the Gospel. The tears rolled down her cheeks.

“Let not my child become a Christian!” Her mother’s dying words rang through her soul with those of the law, “Honor thy father and thy mother!”

“Still I have not been baptized! They call me ‘the Jewess’; the boys of the neighborhood mocked me last Sunday as I stood outside the church door and looked in at the burning altar lights and the singing congregation. Ever since my school days, up to this very hour, the power of Christianity, which is like a sunbeam, and which, no matter how much I close my eyes, penetrates into my heart. But, my mother, I will not bring you sorrow in your grave! I will not betray the promise my father made to you; I will not read the Christian’s Bible! Have I not the God of my fathers? On Him let me rest my head!”

And the years rolled by.

The husband died, and the wife was left in difficult circumstances. The servant girl had to be dismissed, but Sarah would not leave the widow. She became her help in time of trouble and kept the little household together; she worked late every night, and by the labor of her own hands got bread for the house. There were no close relatives to help a family where the widow grew weaker each day, lingering for months on a sickbed. Gentle and good Sarah watched and nursed and labored and was the blessing of the poverty-stricken home.

recommended by: Lusia Holcman Vogel

“There is the Bible,” said the sick woman one evening. “Read a little to me; the evening is so long, and I sadly need to hear the word of God.”

Sarah bowed her head, picked up the Bible and folded her hands around it, opened it, and read aloud to the sick woman. Often the tears came into her eyes, but they shone more clearly, and the darkness lifted from her soul. “Mother, your child shall not receive the baptism of the Christians, shall not be named in their communion. You have wished it, and I shall honor your wish. In this we are united here on earth, but above this is-is a greater union in God. He leads and guides us beyond Death. ‘I will pour water upon him that is thirsty, and floods upon the dry ground.’ Oh, I understand now! I do not know myself how I came to it! Through Him it was-in Him-Christ!”

And she trembled as she spoke the holy name; a baptism of fire streamed through her, stronger than her feeble frame could bear, and she sank down, more exhausted even than the sick woman whom she nursed.

“Poor Sarah!” people said. “She is worn out with labor and nursing!”

They took her to the charity hospital, and there she died, and thence she was carried to her grave. It was not to the graveyard of the Christians-that was not the place for a Jewish girl; no, outside by the wall they dug a grave for her.

But God’s sun, which shines upon the graves of the Christians, shines as well upon that of the Jewish girl; and the hymns which are sung beside the Christian graves sound also beside her grave outside the wall. And out there, too, reaches the promise: “There is resurrection in Christ, in Him, the Saviour, who said to His Disciples, ‘John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holv (NB = Holy) Ghost!’ “



twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com

 


France is close to an Islamic explosion

France is close to an Islamic explosion

Giulio Meotti


Giulio Meotti

Open war with French Muslims has not yet broken out, but recent events are bringing it closer.

In 1961, when it was clear that France had no chance of winning the war in Algeria, ideas about partitions of that North African country flourished. One that was seriously considered suggestef creating a reserve for Whites and Harkis around the city of Oran, while Algiers would have been, like Berlin, a city divided in two parts.

General de Gaulle eventually rejected the plan drawn up by Alain Peyrefitte. But it happened elsewhere. Greece and Turkey exchanged their populations in 1922 to put an end to a war that lasted 100 years and, as a result, the war in Cyprus ended. Sudan closed the book on its civil war by granting independence to the south of the country. The same thing happened in Northern Ireland.

The “War over France” is hardly just at its beginnings. Many murderous Islamist attacks have taken place and large territories are already outside the control of the French secular Republic. Even if the conflict is still in its infancy, the notion of “partition” or secession is advancing in public opinion. That is why in the monthly magazine Causeur, a respected publication edited by Elizabeth Levy, a long article just supported the idea of a division of France.

“Everyone realizes that a second people has formed in France, a branch that wants to define its life on religious values ​​and is fundamentally opposed to the liberal consensus on which our country was founded,” writes Christian de Moliner. “But a nation always rests on a fundamental pact, a minimum of laws that all approve. This is not the case anymore”.

While France is not yet at open war, the faithful of the Prophet are already grouped in areas governed by special rules (compulsory veil, anti-Semitism, marital life regulated according to the Qur’anic principles). “For fear of appearing ‘Islamophobic’ and to satisfy this burgeoning fringe of Muslims, the French governments are ready to accept the spread of radical practices throughout the country: the veil at school and at work, the obligation of halal meat in all the canteens”.

There will not be adherence of the entire country to Islam as in Michel Houellebecq’s “Submission”, but simply the situation where a religious minority imposes its rules on large parts of it. “The expulsion of the extremists, elegantly called ‘remigration’, is impossible if we keep a democratic framework. Deporting the descendants of immigrants would be brutal and intolerable and it is enough to be convinced to look at the dreadful fate of the Rohingyas. A total separation, territorial and political, is impossible. No viable nation can be formed from multiple Muslim ghettos that have no geographical unity. The only solution that seems to me to suit the various trends of the current society would one territory, one government, but two peoples: the French with the usual laws and Muslims with a Qur’anic status. A council of ulemas will fix the religious law, but the autonomy will stop there. It is obviously out of the question that an embryonic Muslim government is settling in France. The idea would bring peace to France, break the excesses of Islam and preserve a democratic framework for 95% of the population”.

De Moliner’s practical proposal is clearly utopian, but the very fact that in France writers and journalists are trying to imagine such solutions to the current state of the country gives you an idea of what is happening in Paris. It is in a panic. Muslim extremists and bandits took control of many no-go French areas, Jews are leaving their historic areas to regroup in more safe ones, the magazine Charlie Hebdo is suffering a new wave of mortal death threats, Emmanuel Macron just returned from a trip in Abu Dhabi and Ryadh where he praised Islam and the French foreign fighters are returning to their home country after the defeat of ISIS in Syria.

Everything is now returning to its proper place. Ready for a future Islamist explosion.


Giulio Meotti
The writer, an Italian journalist with Il Foglio, writes a twice-weekly column for Arutz Sheva. He is the author of the book “A New Shoah”, that researched the personal stories of Israel’s terror victims, published by Encounter and of “J’Accuse: the Vatican Against Israel” published by Mantua Books.. His writing has appeared in publications, such as the Wall Street Journal, Frontpage and Commentary.


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com