Archive | July 2016

Israel’s desert kibbutzim

Israel21cPostcard from Israel: Israel’s desert kibbutzim

Think it’s too hot and dry to get much done in the desert? Wait till you see the beautiful and delicious innovations of Israel’s southern kibbutzim.

Abundant agriculture, eco-design, woodworking, culinary arts, winemaking, dairy farming and metalworking are among the many vibrant pursuits happening in the desert kibbutzim of Israel.

Click on the video above to see the innovations kibbutz members are creating every day in southern kibbutzim such as Neot Semadar, Ketura and Lotan.


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com

 


The Arabs’ Real Grievance against the Jews

Gatestone InstituteThe Arabs’ Real Grievance against the Jews

by Fred Maroun


  • The Arab world still does not today accept the concept of a Jewish state of any size or any shape. Even Egypt and Jordan, who signed peace agreements with Israel, do not accept that Israel is a Jewish state, and they continue to promote anti-Semitic hatred against Israel.
  • During Israel’s War of Independence, Jews were ethnically cleansed from Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem, and in the years that followed, they were ethnically cleansed from the rest of the Arab world.
  • Jews demand the right to exist, and to exist as equals, on the land where they have existed and belonged continuously for more than three thousand years.
  • We would rather claim that the conflict is about “occupation” and “settlements.” The Jews see what radical Islamists are now doing to Christians and other minorities, who were also in the Middle East for thousands of years before the Muslim Prophet Mohammed was even born.
  • The real Arab grievance against the Jews is that they exist.

As Arabs, we are very adept at demanding that our human rights be respected, at least when we live in liberal democracies such as in North America, Europe, and Israel. But what about when it comes to our respecting the human rights of others, particularly Jews?

When we examine our attitude towards Jews, both historically and at present, we realize that it is centered on denying Jews the most fundamental human right, the right without which no other human right is relevant: the right to exist.

The right to exist in the Middle East before 1948

Anti-Zionists often repeat the claim that before modern Israel, Jews were able to live in peace in the Middle East, and that it is the establishment of the State of Israel that created Arab hostility towards Jews. That is a lie.

Before modern Israel, as the historian Martin Gilbert wrote, “Jews held the inferior status of dhimmi, which, despite giving them protection to worship according to their own faith, subjected them to many vexatious and humiliating restrictions in their daily lives.” As another historian, G.E. von Grunebaum, wrote, Jews in the Middle East faced “a lengthy list of persecutions, arbitrary confiscations, attempted forced conversions, or pogroms.”

The right to exist as an independent state

Zionism stemmed from the need for Jews to be masters of their own fate; no longer to be the victims of discrimination or massacres simply for being Jews. This project was accepted and formally recognized by the British, who had been granted a mandate over Palestine by the League of Nations. The Arab world, however, never accepted the recognition formulated by Britain in the Balfour Declaration of 1917, and it never accepted the partition plan approved by the United Nations in 1947, which recognized the right of the Jews to their own state.

The Arab refusal to accept the Jewish state’s right to exist, a right that carries more international legal weight than almost any other country’s right to exist, resulted in several wars, starting with the war of independence in 1948-1949. The Arab world still does not today accept the concept of a Jewish state of any size or any shape. Even Egypt and Jordan, which signed peace agreements with Israel, do not accept that Israel is a Jewish state, and they continue to promote anti-Semitic hatred against Israel.

The right to exist in Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem

In 2005, Israel evacuated all its troops and all Jewish inhabitants from Gaza, in the hope that this would bring peace at least on that front, and to allow the Gaza Strip, vacated by Jews, to be a flourishing Arab Riviera, or a second Singapore, and perhaps to serve as a model for the West Bank. The experiment failed miserably. This is a case where Jews willingly gave up their right to exist on a piece of land, but sadly the Palestinians of Gaza took it not as opportunity for peace, but as a sign that if you keep on shooting at Jews, they leave — so let’s keep on shooting.

There are many opinions among Zionists as to what to do about the West Bank. These opinions range from a total unilateral withdrawal as in Gaza, to a full annexation, with many options in between. At the moment, the status quo prevails, with no specific plans for the future.

Everyone, however, despite the treacherous UNESCO’s rewriting of history, knows that before that piece of land was called the West Bank, it was called Judea and Samaria for more than two thousand years.

Everyone knows that Hebron contains the traditional burial site of the biblical Patriarchs and Matriarchs, within the Cave of the Patriarchs, and it is considered the second-holiest site in Judaism. Every reasonable person knows that Jews should unquestionably have the right to exist on that land, even if it is under Arab or Muslim jurisdiction. Yet everyone also knows that no Arab regime is capable or even willing to protect the safety of Jews living under its jurisdiction from the anti-Semitic hatred that emanates from the Arab world.

East Jerusalem, which was carved away by the Kingdom of Jordan from the rest of Jerusalem during the war of independence, is part of Jerusalem, and contains the Temple Mount, the Jews’ holiest site. The Old City in East Jerusalem was inhabited by Jews up until they were ethnically cleansed by Jordan in the war of 1948-1949.

In May 1948, the Jordanian Arab Legion expelled all of the approximately 2000 Jews who lived in the Old City of Jerusalem, and then turned the Jewish Quarter into rubble.

Although Israel has twice in the past, first under Prime Minister Ehud Barak then under Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, offered East Jerusalem as part of a Palestinian state, that offer is not likely to be made again. Jews know that it would mean a new wave of ethnic cleansing, which would deny the Jewish right to exist on the piece of land where that right is more important than anywhere else.

The right to exist in the Middle East now

During Israel’s War of Independence, Jews were ethnically cleansed from Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem, and in the years that followed, they were ethnically cleansed from the rest of the Arab world.

Today, Israel’s enemies, many of them Arab, are challenging its right to exist, and therefore the right of Jews to exist, on two fronts: threats of nuclear annihilation and annihilation through demographic suffocation.

Iran’s Islamist regime has repeated several times its intention to destroy Israel using nuclear weapons. Just in case Iran is not “successful,” the so-called “pro-Palestinian” movement, including the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, has a different plan to destroy the Jewish state: a single state with the “return” of all the descendants of Palestinian refugees. The refusal of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and his predecessor Yasser Arafat to accept any two-state solution presented to them is part of that plan.

The right to exist elsewhere

Anti-Zionists claim that Jews are imperialists in the Middle East, as were the British and the French, and like them, they should leave and go back to where they belong. This analogy is of course not true: Jews have an even longer history in the Middle East than do Muslims or Arabs.

Do Jews belong in Europe, which tried only a few decades ago to kill every Jew, man, woman, or child? Do Jews belong in North America where until a few hundred years ago, there were no Europeans, only Indians?

Saying that Jews “belong” in such places is not reality; it is just a convenient claim for anti-Zionists to make.

The Jews will not give up

As Arabs, we complain because Palestinians feel humiliated going through Israeli checkpoints. We complain because Israel is building in the West Bank without Palestinian permission, and we complain because Israel dares to defend itself against Palestinian terrorists. But how many of us have stopped to consider how this situation came to be? How many of us have the courage to admit that waging war after war against the Jews in order to deny them the right to exist, and refusing every reasonable solution to the conflict, has led to the current situation?

Our message to Jews, throughout history and particularly when they had the temerity to want to govern themselves, has been clear: we cannot tolerate your very existence.

Yet the Jews demand the right to exist and to exist as equals on the land where they have existed and belonged continuously for more than three thousand years.

In addition, denying a people the right to exist is a crime of unimaginable proportions. We Arabs pretend that our lack of respect for the right of Jews to exist is not the cause of the conflict between the Jews and us. We would rather claim that the conflict is about “occupation” and “settlements”. They see what radical Islamists are now doing to Christians and other minorities, who were also in the Middle East for thousands of years before the Muslim Prophet Mohammed was even born: Yazidis, Kurds, Christians, Copts, Assyrians, Arameans, and many others. Where are these indigenous people of Iraq, Syria and Egypt now? Are they living freely or are they being persecuted, run out of their own historical land, slaughtered by Islamists? Jews know that this is what would have happened to them if they did not have their own state.

The real Arab grievance against the Jews is that they exist. We want the Jews either to disappear or be subservient to our whims, but the Jews refuse to bend to our bigotry, and they refuse to be swayed by our threats and our slander.

Who in his right mind can blame them?


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com

 


ZiH – Newsletter 6-13 lipca 2016

ZiH Newsletter 6-13 lipca 2016

ZiH


Żydowski Instytut Historyczny im. Emanuela Ringelbluma zaprasza do wzięcia udziału w Marszu Pamięci, który odbędzie się 22 lipca br. w Warszawie.
Tegoroczny Marsz w sposób szczególny dedykujemy lekarzom i personelowi medycznemu, wszystkim niosącym pomoc potrzebującym w czasach „nadludzkiej medycyny”.
Chcemy upamiętnić pracowników służby zdrowia, którzy do końca pozostali przy swoich pacjentach, a kiedy nie było już dla nich nadziei, stali się dla nich „dawcami cichej śmierci”.
Spotykamy się 22 lipca o godz. 17.00 pod pomnikiem Umschlagplatz 
(ul. Stawki róg Dzikiej).
WYSTAWA
AMSTERDAM POLSKICH ŻYDÓWPodstawę ekspozycji stanowi pozostająca w zbiorach ŻIH, licząca ponad 200 tomów, kolekcja amsterdamskich starych druków z XVII i XVIII wieku. Autorzy wybrali z niej 30 pozycji, które według nich stanowią najlepszą ilustrację omawianego okresu rozwoju drukarstwa hebrajskiego.
PAMIĘCI WŁADYSŁAWA SZPILMANA

Władysław Szpilman (ps. Al Legro), pianista, kompozytor, kameralista, urodził się 5 grudnia 1911 roku w Sosnowcu w rodzinie o tradycjach muzycznych. Uczył sie fortepianu w Wyższej Szkole Muzycznej im. Fryderyka Chopina w Warszawie pod kierunkiem Aleksandra Michałowskiego i Józefa Śmidowicza, a następnie w Akademii Muzycznej w Wiedniu.
W 1931 roku, uzyskawszy stypendium, wyjechał do Berlina i w tamtejszej Akademii Muzycznej ukończył studia u Artura Schnabla (fortepian) i Franza Schrekera (kompozycja).
Występując w Berlinie dał sie poznać jako znakomity pianista. I tu też powstały pierwsze jego kompozycje, jak suita fortepianowa Życie maszyn i kilka utworów symfonicznych.
Po dojściu Hitlera do władzy, w 1933 roku, Szpilman opuścił Berlin i wrócił do Warszawy. Tu rozpoczął działalność koncertową, występując często wraz ze znanym skrzypkiem Bronisławem Gimplem.


W 1935 roku został zaangażowany do Polskiego Radia jako pianista, gdzie pracował do wybuchu wojny. Nie zaprzestał działalności koncertowej, występując m.in. z tak wybitnymi, światowej sławy skrzypkami, jak Bronisław Gimpel, Ida Haendel, Henryk Szeryng, Roman Totenberg.
Szpilman znalazł się wraz z rodziną w getcie warszawskim. Grał w kawiarniach, także jako akompaniator. Skomponował tu również parę piosenek oraz utwór Casanova do tekstu Władysława Szlengla na głos i dwa fortepiany.
Gdy rozpoczęła się deportacja Żydów z warszawskiego getta do obozu zagłady w Treblince, ofiarą Niemców stała sie także rodzina Szpilmanów. Władysławowi udało sie uniknąć deportacji. Przebywał nadal w getcie, gdzie bywał zatrudniany dorywczo jako robotnik. Przed wybuchem powstania w getcie warszawskim, udało mu się przedostać na tzw. „aryjską stronę”, gdzie dzięki pomocy przyjaciół, m.in. małżenstw Boguckich i Lewickich oraz kilku znanych kompozytorów, przetrwał do wybuchu powstania warszawskiego. Podczas powstania i po jego upadku dalsze korzystanie z pomocy przyjaciół stało się niemożliwe. Szpilman, skazany wyłącznie na własne siły, z trudem znalazł kryjówkę w na wpół spalonym budynku, wegetując w nim o chłodzie i głodzie.

Skrajnie wyczerpany, bliski smobójstwa, został przypadkowo odkryty przez niemieckiego oficera, kapitana Wehrmachtu Wilma Hosenfelda. Nie dowierzając wyjaśnieniu Szpilmana, że jest on pianistą, Hosenfeld zaprowadził go do ocalałego pokoju, gdzie stał fortepian i kazał mu coś zagrać. Dzięki pomocy Hosenfelda, który dostarczał Szpilmanowi żywność i ciepłe okrycia, Szpilman dotrwal do końca wojny. W 1946 roku ukazała się książka Śmierć miasta,opracowana współnie przez Szpilmana i Jerzego Waldorffa, opisująca dramatyczne przeżycia pianisty. Po latach, publikacja, już bez skrótów wymuszonych cenzurą, została wznowiona (Władysław Szpilman, Pianista, Wydawnictwo Znak, 2000). Została wydana także za granicą i stała się podstawą filmu Polańskiego pod tym samym tytułem.
Po wojnie Szpilman wznowił aktywną działalność. Wrócił do pracy w Polskim Radiu, gdzie przez pewien czas był dyrektorem działu muzycznego. Kontynuował działalność koncertową, jako pianista i kameralista, zakładając, wraz z Bronisławem Gimplem, znakomity „Kwintet Warszawski”. Nadal komponował niezliczone piosenki. Był pomysłodawcą i organizatorem pierwszego Międzynarodowego Festiwalu Piosenki w Sopocie (1961).

Zmarł 6 lipca 2000 roku w Warszawie.
Strona internetowa Instytutu

twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com

 


40 maps that explain the Middle East

40 maps that explain the Middle East

Max Fisher


Maps can be a powerful tool for understanding the world, particularly the Middle East, a place in many ways shaped by changing political borders and demographics. Here are 40 maps crucial for understanding the Middle East — its history, its present, and some of the most important stories in the region today.


1.  The fertile crescent, the cradle of civilization

If this area wasn’t the birthplace of human civilization, it was at least a birthplace of human civilization. Called “the fertile crescent” because of its lush soil, the “crescent” of land mostly includes modern-day Iraq, Syria, Jordan, and Israel-Palestine. (Some definitions also include the Nile River valley in Egypt.) People started farming here in 9000 BC, and by around 2500 BC the Sumerians formed the first complex society that resembles what we’d now call a “country,” complete with written laws and a political system. Put differently, there are more years between Sumerians and ancient Romans than there are between ancient Romans and us.


2. How ancient Phoenicians spread from Lebanon across the Mediterranean

The Phoenicians, who lived in present-day Lebanon and coastal Syria, were pretty awesome. From about 1500 to 300 BC, they ran some of the Mediterranean’s first big trading networks, shown in red, and dominated the sea along with the Greeks, who are shown in brown. Some sailed as far as the British Isles, and many of them set up colonies in North Africa, Spain, Sicily, and Sardinia. This was one of the first of many close cultural links between the Middle East and North Africa – and why Libya’s capital, Tripoli, still bears the name of the ancient Phoenician colony that established it.


3. How the Middle East gave Europe religion, three times

The Middle East actually gave Europe religion four times, including Islam, but this map shows the first three. First was Judaism, which spread through natural immigration and when Romans forcibly dispersed the rebelling Israelites in the first and second century AD. In the first through third centuries A.D., a religion called Mithraism — sometimes called a “mystery religion” for its emphasis on secret rites and clandestine worship — spread from present-day Turkey or Armenia throughout the Roman Empire (at the time, most adherents believed it was from Persians in modern-day Iran, but this is probably wrong). Mithraism was completely replaced with Christianity, which became the Roman Empire’s official religion, after a few centuries. It’s easy to forget that, for centuries, Christianity was predominantly a religion of Middle Easterners, who in turn converted Europeans.


read more: 40 maps that explain the Middle East


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com

 


Algeria Cancels Soccer Match With Ghana Because They Have an Israeli Coach

Algeria Cancels Soccer Match With Ghana Because They Have an Israeli Coach

Via JTA


Algeria soccer

Don’t hate the player, hate the Jewish coach, might be Algeria’s sports motto.

Algeria’s soccer team is reportedly pulling out of a friendly match with Ghana because they have an Israeli head coach, according to the Times of Israel reporting from Ghanaian media.

According to the report, the Algerian team canceled the match scheduled for September to ensure that Avram Grant did not step foot in their country, which could potentially infuriate the Algerian people who embrace a pro-Palestinian agenda.

Algerian journalist Ayman Gada posted to Facebook that “the Algerian national team canceled the friendly match because it refused to host Ghana’s Israeli coach,” the Times of Israel said.

Grant, a veteran coach of the English soccer team Chelsea, has been coaching the West African nation’s team for the past two years.


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com