Archive | 2015/11/11

Kolonia Wawelberga, dzieło marzyciela

Kolonia Wawelberga, dzieło marzyciela


Hipolit Wawelberg (ur. 8 maja 1843 w Warszawie, zm. 20 października 1901 w Wiesbaden) – polski finansista pochodzenia żydowskiego i takiegoż wyznania, filantrop i działacz społeczny, współwłaściciel Domu Bankowego Hipolit Wawelberg w Warszawie (przy ulicy Fredry) i Petersburgu (przy Newskim Prospekcie). Brał udział w powstaniu styczniowym po którym udał się, by uniknąć represji, na studia w Akademii Handlowej w Berlinie.


Kolonia Wawelberga, dzieło marzyciela. Niesamowita historia osiedla na Woli

Warszawa jest miastem w którym ze względu na swoją historię prawie wszystko zniknęło. Odbudowaliśmy Stare Miasto i Zamek Królewski, dbamy o nie, remontujemy. Ale to są makiety. Zapominając o tym, że mamy w Warszawie prawdziwe zabytki. Takie jak Kolonia Wawelberga. To właśnie stąd promieniowała na całą Warszawę nowoczesność, tu powstały jedne z pierwszych murowanych budynków i tu znajduje się najstarsze osiedle socjalne w Warszawie. A program społeczny, który został przygotowany dla tego miejsca stał się zaczynem późniejszych inicjatyw, takich jak m.in. Żoliborska Spółdzielnia Mieszkaniowa. Poznajcie niezwykłą historię wolskiego osiedla.

Kolonia WawelbergaIdea osiedla składającego się z budynków przy ul. Górczewskiej 15 i 15 A oraz ul. Wawelberga 3 była jak na ówczesne czasy (XIX wiek) kompletnie nietypowa. Powstała z potrzeby, aby zmienić los ludzi, którzy żyli w nędzy. Często w bardzo w prymitywnych warunkach. Pamiętajmy, że przez przepisy carskie Warszawa nie mogła się rozwijać, miasto było niesamowicie zagęszczone, a ludzie żyli w tragicznych warunkach mieszkaniowych, szczególnie klasa robotnicza. Hipolit Wawelberg, wymyślił sobie, że stworzy miejsce w którym ludzie pracy będą mogli za nie wielkie pieniądze wynająć mieszkanie, i co za tym idzie, godnie żyć. A warunki, które będą wokół tego przedsięwzięcia funkcjonowały pozwolą się im rozwijać oraz tworzą nową jakość kraju.

Hipolit Wawelberg, który pomysł na nietypowe osiedle podpatrzył w Wielkiej Brytanii, urodził się w 1843 roku w Warszawie. Jego ojciec był przykładem polskiego “rockefellera”. Zaczynał karierę jako tragarz, potem pracował w kantorze wymiany walut, z czasem został jego właścicielem i za zarobione pieniądze zbudował … bank, który zresztą istnieje do dzisiaj – Bank Zachodni. Jego syn, Hipolit Jr nie chciał być bankowcem, a inżynierem. Jako młody człowiek wziął udział w Powstaniu Styczniowym. Rodzina bała się represji, dlatego wysłała go za granicę, by skończył studia. W międzyczasie założył oddział banku w Petersburgu, za którego prowadzenie miał odpowiadać jego syn. I to wtedy po raz pierwszy Hipolit zasłynął z działalności filantropijnej. Zaczął pomagać finansowo polskim studentom, organizował stołówki, wydawał książki, sfinansował wydawanie tygodnika “Kraj”. Marzył o nowoczesnej Polsce. I z tego marzenia wzięła się Kolonia Wawelberga.

Czytaj dalej tu: Kolonia Wawelberga, dzieło marzyciela


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com

 


Amnesty’s true mission

Judith Bergman

Amnesty’s true mission


Amnesty International’s conclusions on the situation here in Israel are always bizarrely perverse. The latest is no different: “Israeli forces have carried out a series of unlawful killings of Palestinians using intentional lethal force without justification … based on the findings of an ongoing research trip to the West Bank, including east Jerusalem. … The organization has documented in depth at least four incidents in which Palestinians were deliberately shot dead by Israeli forces when they posed no imminent threat to life, in what appear to have been extrajudicial executions. … Since Oct. 1, Israeli forces have killed more than 30 Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and Israel either after stabbings were carried out or the Israeli authorities allege stabbing attacks were intended.

“There is mounting evidence that, as tensions have risen dramatically, in some cases Israeli forces appear to have ripped up the rule book and resorted to extreme and unlawful measures. They seem increasingly prone to using lethal force against anyone they perceive as posing a threat, without ensuring that the threat is real,” Amnesty International wrote in a press release on Oct. 27.

As blogger Elder of Ziyon has already exposed, Amnesty’s “in-depth documentation” is based on lies. This is the most egregious element of Amnesty’s attempt to insert itself into the situation.

Another, no less infuriating element is the phrasing. The so-called researchers on behalf of Amnesty take great care not to mention explicitly, even once, against whom or why Israel is defending itself. Stabbings were “carried out” and “the Israeli authorities allege stabbing attacks were intended.” So according to this kind of jargon, also popular with mainstream media outlets like the BBC (“Jerusalem attack kills two”), the stabbings more or less carry themselves out with no one really at fault.

Indeed, the phrase “Israeli authorities allege” is used precisely to plant doubt in the reader’s mind as to whether the stabbings and all the other recent terrorist attacks are in fact a figment of the Israelis’ paranoid imagination. Indeed, Amnesty describes Arab terror sweeping across Israel with a typical misnomer — “mounting tensions.”

Astoundingly, Amnesty does not mention a single Jewish terror victim in its report; it’s not even trying to conceal its heavy bias. Instead, Philip Luther, director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at Amnesty International, says, “Israeli forces and civilians have faced genuine attacks and threats to their lives over the past weeks.”

That is probably the understatement of the year. Here are the cold and heartbreaking facts according to the IDF and Magen David Adom emergency medical service: As of Nov. 2, there have been 58 stabbings, five shootings and six car rammings, in which 11 people have been killed and 153 wounded, 18 of them seriously. Magen David Adom also treated 72 people for shock. Let us not forget — many of the terror victims who suffered shock or physical injuries will live with the effects for years to come. Many will suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, of which nightmares, constant anxiety and fear of leaving the house are just a few of the symptoms. The families and friends of the dead will live with the sorrow forever. These are real people, but Amnesty International does not even consider it worth mentioning them as a statistic.

Amnesty’s true mission

Amnesty International’s conclusions on the situation here in Israel are always bizarrely perverse. The latest is no different: “Israeli forces have carried out a series of unlawful killings of Palestinians using intentional lethal force without justification … based on the findings of an ongoing research trip to the West Bank, including east Jerusalem. … The organization has documented in depth at least four incidents in which Palestinians were deliberately shot dead by Israeli forces when they posed no imminent threat to life, in what appear to have been extrajudicial executions. … Since Oct. 1, Israeli forces have killed more than 30 Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and Israel either after stabbings were carried out or the Israeli authorities allege stabbing attacks were intended.

“There is mounting evidence that, as tensions have risen dramatically, in some cases Israeli forces appear to have ripped up the rule book and resorted to extreme and unlawful measures. They seem increasingly prone to using lethal force against anyone they perceive as posing a threat, without ensuring that the threat is real,” Amnesty International wrote in a press release on Oct. 27.

As blogger Elder of Ziyon has already exposed, Amnesty’s “in-depth documentation” is based on lies. This is the most egregious element of Amnesty’s attempt to insert itself into the situation.

Another, no less infuriating element is the phrasing. The so-called researchers on behalf of Amnesty take great care not to mention explicitly, even once, against whom or why Israel is defending itself. Stabbings were “carried out” and “the Israeli authorities allege stabbing attacks were intended.” So according to this kind of jargon, also popular with mainstream media outlets like the BBC (“Jerusalem attack kills two”), the stabbings more or less carry themselves out with no one really at fault.

Indeed, the phrase “Israeli authorities allege” is used precisely to plant doubt in the reader’s mind as to whether the stabbings and all the other recent terrorist attacks are in fact a figment of the Israelis’ paranoid imagination. Indeed, Amnesty describes Arab terror sweeping across Israel with a typical misnomer — “mounting tensions.”

Astoundingly, Amnesty does not mention a single Jewish terror victim in its report; it’s not even trying to conceal its heavy bias. Instead, Philip Luther, director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at Amnesty International, says, “Israeli forces and civilians have faced genuine attacks and threats to their lives over the past weeks.”

That is probably the understatement of the year. Here are the cold and heartbreaking facts according to the IDF and Magen David Adom emergency medical service: As of Nov. 2, there have been 58 stabbings, five shootings and six car rammings, in which 11 people have been killed and 153 wounded, 18 of them seriously. Magen David Adom also treated 72 people for shock. Let us not forget — many of the terror victims who suffered shock or physical injuries will live with the effects for years to come. Many will suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, of which nightmares, constant anxiety and fear of leaving the house are just a few of the symptoms. The families and friends of the dead will live with the sorrow forever. These are real people, but Amnesty International does not even consider it worth mentioning them as a statistic.

This kind of manipulation of facts through false accusations, omission and insinuation provides implicit justification for the Arab terror spree, while at the same time it displays a warped disregard for the obligation of any state to defend its citizens. Amnesty is in no position to dictate to Israel, especially in light of the fact that Israel takes every measure imaginable to avoid senseless death and indeed gives terrorists hospital care courtesy of the same taxpaying Jews that the terrorists so desperately want to kill.

Already, the untruths that Amnesty publishes (if it were not known that the report had been published by Amnesty, it could arguably have been penned by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas himself) are emboldening those who suffer from anti-Israel delusions. On the very same day that Amnesty published its “findings,” British MP Sir Gerald Kaufman claimed that Israel “fabricates stabbings” as a “ruse to execute Palestinians” and that “Jewish money” has influenced the Conservative Party. Clearly, one hardly needs to scratch the surface in order for all the old blood libels to come out, happy to greet the new ones.

Amnesty International crossed every red line long ago, but this latest report manages to up the slander of Israel one more notch. That is saying quite a lot for an organization that has been in libeling business for a long time.

Amnesty is on a mission and it is not a fact-finding one. The organization relies on donations. It would be interesting to uncover, in detail, the amount of funding Amnesty receives for the express purpose of blackening Israel’s name. There are a few obvious suspects as to the identity of the donors. Whoever they are, there can be no doubt that Amnesty makes a travesty of what it purports to support: human rights


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com

 


An Idiot’s Guide for the Media on How to Do Your Job Properly

An Idiot’s Guide for the Media on How to Do Your Job Properly

Noah Beck


An imaginary newspaper report about 9/11. Photo: Screenshot.

A new instructive video shows what news reports would look like if they applied their outrageous Israel-reporting techniques to terrorist attacks in the rest of the world. In the hope of lessening the egregious anti-Israel bias, here are some pointers to members of the media:

1) Your job is to report facts, not reinforce a narrative. Really. The facts matter – they form the basis for judgments. So here are some facts for you, meticulously documented and updated (with details and graphs worthy of a data scientist) in a shared Google spreadsheet by Nehemia Gershuni-Aylho. According to his data, in the fifty days from September 11 through October 31, there have been 1,315 Arab Muslim attacks on Jews, including stabbings, bombings, rock-throwing, etc. That’s about 26 attacks per day resulting in the murder of 11 innocent Jews. Adjusted for the US population, that’s over 1,000 knife, bomb and other attacks per day that kill 440 people during fifty days of terror. How would the US react to that?

2) Remember that the weaker party can be wrong. Actually, when a Palestinian man stabs a 70-year old woman, he’s not even the weaker party. Sometimes Palestinians do indefensible things. Sometimes Israel is guilty of only trying to protect its citizens from insanely hateful violence. And as an honest reporter, you should try to show this.

3) Properly identify the terrorist and the victim when reporting on casualties, and describe the main causal sequence of events with relevant context. That’s how you avoid headlines like “Jewish man uses his neck to attack the blade of Palestinian’s knife.” The BBC’s distortions were actually not far from that when they effectively turned terrorists into victims. The BBC’s bias is so egregious that even its former chief complained.

4) Do your homework on this region. Learn its basic history so that you don’t moronically suggest (as the NY Times did) that Jews have no historical connection to the Temple Mount. Otherwise it looks like you’re trying to support Palestinian revisionism against basic facts and endless archaeological evidence (including what a 10-year old recently discovered).

5) Learn the history of this conflict enough to know that Pallywood has been actively deceiving journalists for at least 15 years now, in an effort to delegitimize Israel. Before publishing “information” fed to you by fixers and “eyewitnesses,” realize that even Amnesty International has admitted the unreliability of “eyewitnesses” in this conflict. The most galling Pallywood example from this latest round of Arab terrorism is the inflammatory lie – by “moderate” Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas – that Israeli forces had “executed” a 13-year old. The truth: he was treated in the same Israeli hospital caring for the boy he tried to murder.

Such lies can kill. Because when it comes to this conflict, Arab leaders know that violence replaces reason at the slightest provocation – like hooligans at a football game incited to attack the opponents of their beloved team. So inciting lies are very much a weapon. The media should know this and expose the falsehoods, rather than blindly proliferate them. Journalists should know that “reporting” inflammatory claims can produce mob violence, and should therefore be doubly careful about checking facts, unless of course their goal is to trigger riots (which do produce more sensational news stories).

6) Learn the history of this conflict enough to know that Arab Muslims have been killing Jews in this area for over a century, with shifting excuses over time.

7) Stop trying to use the latest of those shifting excuses to justify the unjustifiable (here, too, the BBC is an offender). No alleged grievance warrants randomly stabbing people in the street. The average Syrian is infinitely worse off than anyone in Gaza or the West Bank, but Syrian teens aren’t randomly stabbing civilians. Countless refugees from Syria, Iraq, and elsewhere have risked their lives for the hope of a better future in Europe. And yet there are virtually no Palestinians from the West Bank or Gaza among the millions desperate to reach Europe. So random stabbings don’t reflect some miserably unfair existence – they are the product of raw hatred and incitement.

8) Take note of nuances. Ninety-two Israeli Arab Muslims have committed terrorist attacks. They are not under occupation (and have better freedoms and living standards than most of the Arab world has). So clearly these attacks are not about any political dispute; they are driven by the same hateful incitement that rejects any state for the Jews.

9) Show cause and effect (ideally one before the other), and not just effect. When you show only Israeli responses to attacks, it makes Israelis look as if they wake up every morning asking how they can hurt Arabs. Israelis actually have better things to do with their mornings. Like cure cancer and stuff. But when people are trying to kill them, they understandably get a bit distracted. If the world could keep Israelis safer, cancer might get cured faster.

10) Articles should contain a logical subject and verb, preferably in a way that indicates who did what. According to CNN, Joseph’s Tomb spontaneously “catches fire.” CNN would rather change the laws of physics than blame Muslims for trying to burn a Jewish holy site. But there is a long list of non-Muslim sites that have been desecrated or destroyed by Muslims – from the Buddhas of Bamiyan razed by the Taliban to the countless monuments and churches destroyed by the Islamic State. History is also littered with Islamic conquests that converted non-Muslim holy sites into mosques.

11) Israeli lives matter. Getting both sides of the story means including photos and profiles of Israeli victims of Arab terrorism at least as often as you include photos and profiles of Arab attackers who were killed while trying to murder innocent Israelis. In case you’re not sure what it’s actually like to survive a stabbing attack, Kay Wilson’s TED Talk is a must-watch for some valuable context (and a reminder of what a life-affirming culture looks like, as opposed to the death cult trying to stamp it out).

12) Don’t be afraid to present Gazans as they present themselves (brandishing butcher knives and calling for Jewish blood). Show this Palestinian mother who celebrates that her child was killed trying to murder Israelis and who hopes that she and her other children all die for the same “cause.” Showing the Palestinian death cult of Jew-hatred that runs from crib to coffin might help observers understand why there’s still no peace.

Just for some context, when was the last time that you saw a video of a Jewish mother hoping that she and her children can all die for the sake of murdering some Germans to avenge the German Nazi murder of six million Jews (which seems a bit worse than praying on a contested holy site)?

Read more: An Idiot’s Guide ….


twoje uwagi, linki, wlasne artykuly, lub wiadomosci przeslij do: webmaster@reunion68.com