The new libel to destroy Israel


The new libel to destroy Israel

Melanie Phillips


Violence in the “West Bank” is being malevolently misrepresented.

Protesters demonstrate at Paris Square in central Jerusalem against attacks by extremist Jewish settlers on Palestinians in the West Bank, Sept. 2, 2026. Photo by Yonatan Sindel/Flash90.

As every part of the “Gaza genocide” mass libel is exposed as a total fabrication, the new mass libel of “settler violence” has replaced it.

From the politicians, NGOs and mainstream media that promulgated the genocide lie, there’s been no acknowledgment of the collapse of the grotesque falsehoods they promoted about starvation and wanton killing of health workers and journalists that have fueled unprecedented attacks on Jews throughout the West.

Instead, without drawing breath, they’re promoting the new purported Israeli mass atrocity of “settler violence.”

This is doing far more damage than the genocide charge. That was patently preposterous, an inversion of the reality of genocidal Palestinian Arab attack and Israel’s supremely just war of self-defense.

By contrast, the claim of “settler violence” carries an element of truth that is being vastly exaggerated to damage the State of Israel itself.

The narrative in the West is that fanatical and violent Israeli “settlers” harass and attack local Arabs to drive them off their land, so that these ultra-nationalist religious Jews can erect yet more “illegal” outposts in a land grab across the “West Bank” of Judea and Samaria.

In recent days, this has spawned a sub-narrative of violent “settlers” laying siege to Arabs cowering inside their homes in the villages of Qusra and Jalud.

There’s no doubt that there’s a problem with fanatical Israeli youths attacking Arab property or mosques that has not been properly addressed. The Israel Defense Forces have now arrested a 19-year-old Israeli over the disturbances in Qusra. The authorities should have shut this problem down, but reprehensibly have not.

But these violent Israelis are very small in number.

David Zini, the head of the Israeli Security Agency (or Shin Bet), has said there’s a hard core of 70 to 100 offenders, mostly not even “settlers” at all but delinquent youths from elsewhere in the country.

Other Israeli sources put the number of these delinquents at between 200 and 500.

But half a million Israeli residents live in these disputed territories—overwhelmingly law-abiding people. And while they are being grotesquely defamed across the West, they are coming under violent and sometimes murderous attack by Arabs every single day.

The overwhelming majority of attacks in these disputed areas are by Arabs on Jews—thousands of incidents of rock-throwing, stabbings, arson, car-rammings, criminal damage and murder.

Moreover, the stories of these sieges have another side.

Last Shabbat, there was a reported siege of an Arab house on Talpiot hill near Jerusalem, with masked Israelis arriving by car.

But according to local Israeli residents, dozens of masked Arab rioters from the nearby village of Kfar Qasim, accompanied by foreign media photographers, ascended the hill, threw stones at residents, and set up barricades to thwart the arrival of IDF forces.

More Arabs then reportedly entered an abandoned house, barricaded themselves inside, and threw stones from it at the Jews in an attempt to brand the incident as another “siege.” Videos shot by local Israeli residents showed masked Arabs throwing stones while foreign journalists stood behind them filming.

On the same Shabbat, masked men described as “settlers” attacked an NBC crew in nearby Jalud. The American journalists were investigating a very similar claim that settlers had “besieged” an Arab family’s property.

The NBC footage itself shows masked men driving directly up to a camera crew, attacking them and leaving. But there was no evidence that these were even Israelis, let alone “settlers.”

There’s also a pattern of American involvement in these situations.

Loui Ridi, a Palestinian American from Ohio who lives full-time in America, said he built his house—the “siege” house—in Qusra three years ago.

In The New York Times, Ridi acknowledged that a week after the siege began, he returned to the house carrying an American flag “as a signal to the American people and the U.S. government to take action” and “impose sanctions on these settlers.”

As Reuters reported, when Ridi arrived, he made his way to Qusr “accompanied by several journalists.” Has anyone ever heard of a siege that a person actually joins behind the siege lines from outside, while brandishing a flag and accompanied by a phalanx of journalists? Does that sound like desperation—or a political stunt?

All these accounts are obviously difficult to verify. But media reports of “settler violence” don’t even acknowledge there’s another side to these stories. Nor do these journalists ask any blindingly obvious questions.

For example, why do so many foreign film crews just happen to be on the scene when Israeli “settlers” launch their unprovoked attacks? Or why are there multiple similar claims of sieges on family homes on the same day?

Or why do spontaneous attacks on local Arabs by Israelis coincide with the regular arrival of foreign activists who provoke the IDF and create violent disturbances, as was filmed in Hebron—by another amazing coincidence—last Shabbat?

The overwhelming majority of attacks in these disputed areas are by Arabs on Jews—thousands of incidents of rock-throwing, stabbings, arson, car-rammings, criminal damage and murder.

In recent days, while politicians and journalists whipped up “settler violence” claims into a feeding frenzy, residents in the Judean hills reported that Arabs from a local village had infiltrated the grazing areas of an Israeli farm and scattered lethal poison hidden inside the herds’ drinking troughs.

Jewish shepherds who arrived to find their dying goats—videos of which were posted on social media—said they were attacked with stones by dozens of Arabs lying in wait nearby.

Jewish residents say farmers’ herds are regularly being stolen and turning up in the Arab casbah. When IDF troops go in to retrieve them, they are set upon by hundreds of Arabs with stones and fireworks.

Israelis’ extremist or revenge attacks on Arabs, their homes or their mosques are happening, and they are shocking and inexcusable—as are their nihilistic attacks on IDF soldiers. But this is a highly complex situation that’s being weaponized to delegitimize and destroy Israel itself.

Western media and politicians never acknowledge attacks on the “settlers,” who have been effectively dehumanized.

The prevailing unwisdom is that they shouldn’t be there in the first place because they are in “illegal occupation of Palestinian land.” So if they are attacked or even murdered, they’re asking for everything they get, and their plight doesn’t even deserve a mention.

Apart from the callous inhumanity of this attitude, it also displays gross ignorance of history and international law.

Unfortunately, a significant number of IDF members and police, who are on the left along with most mainstream Israeli media outlets, also hate the “settlers” and produce a distorted picture on which the venomous West greedily feeds. And Israeli politicians, including the prime minister and president, have merely condemned the Israeli “rioters” and refrained from presenting the other side of the story.

Those who assume that this means the “settler violence” canard is true would do well to remember how in 2000, the Israelis leapt to take responsibility for the apparent shooting and killing of a Palestinian Arab child, Mohammed al-Durah, when a demonstration in the Gaza Strip during the Second Intifada apparently came under IDF fire.

Subsequent evidence revealed that the boy had not been killed and that the whole demonstration was staged.

But the Israelis were less concerned with establishing the truth than with tamping everything down and making the issue go away. The result was a libel against Israel that incited untold numbers of killings, including the murder of American journalist Daniel Pearl.

The same politically craven thinking seems to be operating here. Israel is now under enormous pressure over “settler violence” from both the Trump administration and American Jews, for whom this has become the No. 1 issue because they, too, believe the distorted accounts.

In addition to finally dealing properly with the true miscreants, Israel should not only be responding with the real story behind these “settler attacks,” including the role of foreign provocateurs. It should be telling the world that its citizens have the legal right to live in these disputed territories. It should also be publicly listing every single Arab attack on these Jewish residents.

But as ever, the Israeli government thinks there’s no point trying to persuade the incorrigibly anti-Jewish West of the truth and justice of Israel’s cause.

The result is untold damage being done to the Jewish state, as yet again it fails to engage with the war being waged against it on the battleground of the mind.


Melanie Phillips, a British journalist, broadcaster and author, writes a weekly column for JNS. Currently a columnist for The Times of London, her new book, Fighting the Hate: A Handbook for Jews Under Siege, has just been published by Wicked Son. Her previous book, The Builder’s Stone: How Jews and Christians Built the West and Why Only They Can Save It, was published in 2025. Access her work at: melaniephillips.substack.com.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


France, Canada Join UK in Expanding Trade Sanctions on Israeli Communities in West Bank


France, Canada Join UK in Expanding Trade Sanctions on Israeli Communities in West Bank

Ailin Vilches Arguello


Britain’s Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband speaks at the House of Commons in London, Britain, Sept. 8, 2026. Photo: HOUSE OF COMMONS/Handout via REUTERS

France and Canada will join the United Kingdom in imposing new trade sanctions on Israeli communities in the West Bank, marking one of the most far-reaching Western measures yet as international efforts to boycott and isolate the Jewish state continue to grow.

During a speech in the British Parliament on Tuesday, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband announced a sweeping package of sanctions targeting Israeli settlements in the West Bank, along with a series of additional punitive measures, in what marks one of London’s sharpest rebukes of Israel as relations between the two longtime allies deteriorate.

In a sharp break from Britain’s longstanding foreign policy, the country’s top diplomat accused the Jewish state of “unlawful occupation” of the West Bank, denouncing what he described as an “expansionist agenda via illegal settlements.”

Miliband further accused Israelis of fueling escalating violence against Palestinians, warning that “settler terrorism is rampant.”

“The British government agrees that there is ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in areas of the West Bank – perpetrated by settler terrorists,” Miliband said during his speech. “The Israeli government has turned a blind eye to this and, worse, members of it have made statements and taken actions to support the forced displacement of Palestinians.”

Unlike the current framework, a sweeping trade prohibition goes further by legally blocking goods produced in the West Bank from entering the British market, rather than simply imposing differentiated trade rules or labeling requirements — significantly tightening restrictions and fundamentally reshaping Britain’s trade policy toward the region.

Expected to take effect within six to nine months, London’s new policy measures will ban imports of goods from Israeli communities in the West Bank and impose sanctions on companies and individuals that “facilitate settlement expansion,” including those providing construction, infrastructure, financing, or real estate services for such development.

The British government will also deny licenses for arms and other exports deemed to materially support what British officials called Israel’s “occupation,” ban advertising for settlements in the UK, and sanction a group of “extremist settlers” accused of supporting or inciting violence against Palestinians.

Some analysts were quick to note that such actions will hurt Palestinian workers, thousands of whom work for Israeli employers in West Bank settlements and could lose their jobs as a result.

France and Canada have announced they will both join Britain in imposing their own import bans on goods from Israeli communities in the West Bank, adding to growing boycott efforts aimed at economically isolating the Jewish state.

The measures mark another escalation in the growing rift between Israel and the two Western allies amid the war in Gaza, with Paris and Ottawa backing efforts to recognize a Palestinian state last year and France also pressing within the European Union to end the bloc’s association agreement with Israel.

According to Miliband, several other European countries — including Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Poland, Portugal and Sweden — have also pledged to back the UK’s latest measures, signaling growing support for the British initiative.

“The unlawfulness of the occupation should be reflected in the economic relationships we choose to have with the occupied territories,” the top British diplomat said. 

Eleven other countries ultimately joined the UK in saying they would “introduce national and/or support European restrictions on trade in goods with settlements which are illegal under international law, or that they are actively considering these and other measures, in accordance with their national procedures,” according to a joint statement.

Even as the bilateral relationship between Israel and the UK comes under increasing strain, Miliband said Britain would maintain trade with the Jewish state within the Green Line and continue to oppose the broader boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

“Our argument is not with the people of Israel, with whom the UK has unshakable bonds,” he said. “Our argument is with the conduct of its government.”

Experts noted that the economy of Israel proper and the West Bank are inextricably linked, making it virtually impossible to take such punitive measures against the latter without affecting the Israeli economy.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar sharply denounced the British government’s latest measures, announcing the closure of the British consulate in Jerusalem and warning other countries against taking similar action against Israel.

The top Israeli diplomat rejected Miliband’s accusations as “outrageous lies,” denouncing the British government’s “hostile actions” as driven by domestic political considerations in London.

“The British move is morally distorted, and constitutes blatant interference in the affairs of a sovereign state and its electoral process,” Saar said in a statement. “The message to every government that harms us is clear: You will lose your influence and relevance in the region.”
.

In coordination with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Saar announced further retaliatory measures, including barring Britain from the US-led Gaza coordination mission in Israel, ending British training for Palestinian Authority forces in the West Bank, and banning 12 elected officials and British citizens involved in anti-Israel or antisemitic activities from entering the country.

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee had also warned that Washington could retaliate against Britain amid the escalating dispute, accusing the British government of “Jew hate” and describing its actions as “discrimination against the Jewish people.”

Britain’s Jewish community has also voiced strong opposition to the government’s latest measures, warning that they could undermine prospects for peace while further worsening an already hostile climate for Jews and Israelis across the country.

UK Chief Rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis accused British authorities of playing “gesture politics,” arguing that such measures only “embolden those, at home and abroad, who use hatred as a weapon against Jews.”

“The measures announced amount to little more than political flag bearing for mendacious anti-Israel rhetoric and those who harbor a dangerous obsession with the Jewish state,” Mirvis wrote in a post on X. “These measures will succeed only in bolstering the very extremism they seek to target.”

“On the eve of Rosh Hashanah and at a time when our community is more vulnerable than ever to the wave of extremism that has been building over recent years, these sanctions do nothing to advance the cause of peace. Nor do they make anyone safer – quite the contrary,” he continued.
.

So far, Ireland, Belgium, Norway and Spain are the only European countries to have advanced comprehensive legislative efforts aimed at banning trade with Israeli settlements, while Slovenia has encountered legal and political obstacles that have delayed similar measures.

The Netherlands is also expected to join such efforts, with a new law set to take effect on Sept. 22 that goes beyond similar measures elsewhere by banning imports from Israeli communities not only in the West Bank beyond the Green Line, but also from the Golan Heights.

According to market estimates, goods produced in Israeli communities beyond the Green Line account for about 1 percent of Israel’s exports, meaning exports from these areas to the EU are estimated at roughly $200 million annually, or about 0.3 percent of Israel’s total exports.

Under the current Israeli government, settlement construction in the West Bank has accelerated, with new housing approvals and the legalization of previously unauthorized communities expanding Israel’s presence in the territory — land Palestinians seek as part of a future independent state and which most of the international community considers a violation of international law.

Israel disputes claims that the settlements are illegal, pointing to historical and legal ties to the land as well as arguing they provide strategic depth and security considerations.

Earlier this year, the Israeli government announced plans to advance the E1 project, a settlement initiative east of Jerusalem that would effectively bisect the West Bank and sever its connection to East Jerusalem — a move that drew widespread international condemnation and renewed calls from some governments for sanctions against Israel.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


IDF strikes Southern Lebanon after Hezbollah drone attack


IDF strikes Southern Lebanon after Hezbollah drone attack

NS Staff


No injuries were reported in the drone strike.

IDF soldiers inside Southern Lebanon as seen from the Israeli side of the border, Aug. 6, 2026. Photo by Ayal Margolin/Flash90.

The Israel Defense Forces said on Sunday morning that it was striking in Southern Lebanon after the Iranian-backed Hezbollah terrorist organization launched two drones toward soldiers operating in the security zone.

Troops downed one of the drones, the IDF said. No injuries were reported in the attack.

The statement called the incident “a blatant violation” of the ceasefire agreement with Beirut.

Soldiers “will continue to operate in the security zone in order to remove any threat towards Israeli civilians and IDF soldiers,” the military said, adding that it would act “with determination against Hezbollah’s repeated attempts to harm IDF soldiers.”

Overnight Friday, the IDF also carried out strikes on Hezbollah terrorists and infrastructure in Southern Lebanon in response to a drone launched earlier in the day at soldiers operating in the security zone.

The drone attack constituted a “blatant violation” of the ceasefire agreement, the IDF said.

Israeli soldiers opened fire and downed the drone, the IDF continued, adding that no injuries were reported.

As part of the retaliatory strikes, the IDF struck weapon storage facilities intended to be used by Hezbollah operatives to plan and direct terrorist attacks on IDF soldiers in the security zone and Israeli civilians, the army said.

“The IDF is currently operating and will continue to act with determination against Hezbollah’s repeated attempts to harm IDF soldiers,” the IDF added.

The security zone in control of the Israeli military runs along the Israeli-Lebanese border from the Mediterranean Sea to the area north of Mount Hermon, extending roughly seven miles deep into Lebanon in its furthest points.

Earlier on Friday, Defense Minister Israel Katz reiterated Jerusalem’s position that Israel will not withdraw from Southern Lebanon until Hezbollah is disarmed throughout the country and the danger posed by attacks from the Land of the Cedars is neutralized.

“Prime Minister Netanyahu and I are leading a clear and uncompromising policy, implemented every day by the IDF: Israel will not withdraw from the security zone in Lebanon until Hezbollah is disarmed throughout Lebanon and the threats to the residents of the Galilee are removed,” Katz said.

He said that the IDF’s capture of the Ali al-Taher Ridge in southeastern Lebanon marked the completion of a phase in consolidating Israel’s hold on the security zone.

The decision to advance toward the ridge was made after intelligence indicated the presence of Hezbollah command-and-control tunnels there, according to the defense minister.

The tunnels served as a command center for attacks on IDF troops and the Galilee, while the ridge constituted Hezbollah’s last commanding position protecting the Nabatieh area, giving it strategic importance, Katz said.

Israel releases five Lebanese detainees

Also on Friday, Israel completed the release of five Lebanese civilians as U.S.-mediated negotiations with Beirut continued alongside efforts to locate and repatriate the remains of Lebanese Jewish community leaders abducted and murdered by terrorist organizations in the mid-1980s.

The International Committee of the Red Cross confirmed on Friday that it had facilitated the transfer to Lebanon of all five individuals at the request of the parties.

One detainee was transferred on Thursday and the remaining four on Friday “with full respect for the safety and dignity of the individuals involved,” the ICRC said. “The ICRC’s role in this operation was purely humanitarian, acting as a neutral intermediary between Israel and Lebanon,” it added.
.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Tworzenie polityki: marksistowska tęcza i oddziały szturmowe motłochu


Tworzenie polityki: marksistowska tęcza i oddziały szturmowe motłochu

Peter Huessy


Na zdjęciu: pomnik Karola Marksa w Chemnitz w Niemczech. (Zdjęcie: Velvet/Wikimedia Commons)

Od czasów Karola Marksa komuniści i ich socjalistyczni pobratymcy zakładali, że zazdrość o sukces finansowy skłoni proletariat do przeprowadzenia rewolucji robotniczej w bogatych krajach Zachodu. Okazało się jednak, że nawet biedni chcą być bogaci.

W Ameryce, zamiast zamykać bogatych w łagrach albo zabierać im pieniądze, biedni próbowali wymyślić, jak samemu się wzbogacić.

Dzięki wolności rynkowej w Ameryce przeciętny amerykański pracownik niemal codziennie słyszy o jakimś zwyczajnym człowieku, który wynalazł jakiś gadżet albo wymyślił, jak sprzedać miliony sztuk tego samego produktu – i przy okazji się wzbogacił.

Jak zatem poprowadzić rewolucję, jeśli nie poprzez bunt robotników przeciwko bogatym albo – używając dzisiejszego języka – “oligarchom” i “miliarderom”?

W 1984 roku pastor Jesse Jackson stworzył “Rainbow Coalition” (“Tęczową Koalicję”). Biedni należeli do różnych ras, dlatego Jackson chciał, aby wszystkie rasy zostały włączone w to dążenie do dobrobytu. Wiele lat wcześniej Komunistyczna Partia Chin pod przywództwem Mao Zedonga zalecała, aby komuniści w wyborach w USA wykorzystywali tożsamość rasową – nie klasową czy ekonomiczną. Mao mógł rozumować, że skoro w USA ludzie należący do określonych ras byli w przeszłości uciskani, a niewolnictwo stanowiło dowód numer jeden, białą większość można było zaklasyfikować jako “ciemiężycieli”. Wystarczy dodać wszystkich pozostałych, włączyć kobiety, gejów, lesbijki i osoby biseksualne, a bez trudu wygrywa się konkurs na większość “uciskanych”.

Podsycanie antagonizmów rasowych to wielki biznes. Czterej pastorzy – Jesse Jackson, Jeremiah Wright, Al Sharpton i Louis Farrakhan – postawili sprawę jasno: żadnych kolonialistów, imperialistów ani syjonistów, a oznaczało to białych ludzi. Sam Jackson przewodził demonstracjom podkreślającym, że zachodnia “biała” cywilizacja “musi odejść”. Krótko mówiąc, do “Tęczy” dopuszczano wyłącznie “właściwe” rasy, grupy etniczne, kultury i płeć.

Niestety Sharpton, Joy Reid i burmistrz Nowego Jorku Zohran Mamdani mają dziś podatny grunt do szerzenia nienawiści opartej na rasowych podziałach.

W 1965 roku, dwadzieścia lat przed powstaniem “Rainbow Coalition” Jacksona, Stany Zjednoczone znacząco zmieniły swoje przepisy imigracyjne. Jednym z głównych zwolenników zmian był senator Ted Kennedy (demokrata z Massachusetts). Kluczowi autorzy ustawy, Emanuel Celler (demokrata z Nowego Jorku) i Phil Hart (demokrata z Michigan), stanowczo i wprost przekonywali, że ustawa nie ma na celu zmiany struktury rasowej ani składu etnicznego kraju czy też “zachodnioeuropejskiego dziedzictwa Ameryki”.

W rzeczywistości jednak ustawa z 1965 roku została zaprojektowana właśnie po to – i jej autorzy o tym wiedzieli. Demografia Ameryki musiała się zmienić. W ślad za nowym prawem miał odejść również ten sam amerykański system konstytucyjny, który uznano za “opresyjny”.

Dziś, około 70 lat później, transformacja jest już bardzo zaawansowana. 56 milionów ludzi, czyli 16% populacji USA, to osoby urodzone za granicą. Kolejnych dziesięć do dwudziestu milionów może przebywać tu nielegalnie. Nieprzypadkowo “Demokratyczni Socjaliści Ameryki”, którzy wygrywają prawybory i wybory w całym kraju, to niemal wyłącznie imigranci urodzeni za granicą albo przedstawiciele pierwszego pokolenia potomków przybyszów, a niektórzy z nich byli pierwotnie nawet nielegalnymi imigrantami.

Wielu z nich pochodzi również z państw będących totalitarnymi, często marksistowskimi dyktaturami, które doprowadziły do gospodarczych katastrof. Jak ujął to Dave Portnoy, dyrektor generalny Barstool Sports:

“Jak doszliśmy do tego, że socjalizm jest w jakiś sposób postrzegany jako coś, co ma naprawić Stany Zjednoczone? A swoją drogą, wielu ludzi, którzy to mówią, uciekło z krajów będących koszmarem, żeby przyjechać do Stanów Zjednoczonych!”

Uciekając przed marksizmem, przywożą go ze sobą, a następnie chcą ustanowić go tutaj, w Ameryce.

Ci, którzy podążali śladami “Rainbow Coalition” Jacksona, opowiadali się za “właściwym” rodzajem imigracji: “osobami kolorowymi”. Założenie wydaje się być takie, że ludzie z upadłych krajów Trzeciego Świata są w większości biedni, a zatem prawdopodobnie mają socjalistyczne poglądy polityczne: oczekują darmowej opieki zdrowotnej, bonów żywnościowych, dopłat do mieszkań i czesnego na poziomie przewidzianym dla mieszkańców danego stanu, oferowanych przez Amerykę, niezależnie od tego, czy przybywają jako nielegalni imigranci, czy korzystając z legalnych kanałów imigracyjnych.

Zwróćmy uwagę, że rasa, pochodzenie etniczne i płeć wszystkich “osób kolorowych” są cechami dziedziczonymi: żadna z nich nie ma nic wspólnego z zasługami. Gdy raz zostaniesz uznany za członka grupy uciskanych, pozostajesz w tej klasie na zawsze i nie możesz się z niej wydostać.

I odwrotnie: gdy raz zostaniesz zaliczony do klasy ciemiężycieli – jako biały człowiek, który odniósł sukces – również nigdy nie możesz z niej wyjść. Tkwisz w niej na wieczność, chyba że jesteś objętym wyjątkiem miliarderem, takim jak George Soros, albo multimilionerem, takim jak senatorowie Bernie Sanders i Elizabeth Warren czy kongresmen Ro Khanna. Oni otrzymują specjalną dyspensę.

Grupę uciskanych – obejmującą również klasę imigrantów lub cudzoziemców, legalnych bądź nielegalnych – można rozszerzać bez końca i nigdy jej nie uszczuplać. Zwróćmy uwagę, że “mapa etniczna” Nowego Jorku Mamdaniego pomijała Włochów, Irlandczyków i Żydów – wszystkich białych – a jednocześnie starannie wyróżniała takie grupy jak Pakistańczycy jako część nowo przybyłej klasy uciskanych, której obiecuje się coraz więcej darmowych świadczeń – mieszkania, opiekę medyczną, artykuły spożywcze i edukację. Demokratyczni Socjaliści Ameryki domagają się nawet 32-godzinnego tygodnia pracy przy zachowaniu wynagrodzenia za 40 godzin.

Jeśli chodzi o imigrację, senator Mark Warner (demokrata z Wirginii) oświadczył, że gdy tylko uda ci się przedostać przez straż graniczną lub służby celne, Stany Zjednoczone są ci winne amnestię, obywatelstwo – a przede wszystkim prawo głosu. Najwyraźniej właśnie to oznacza reforma – a właściwie likwidacja – ICE. Jeśli będziemy mieli szczęście, być może zachowamy jakieś elementy straży granicznej “na pokaz”.

Znaczenie amerykańskiego obywatelstwa – podobnie jak sama idea Ameryki i jej konstytucji – zostałoby zatem zniesione. Konstytucja USA zostałaby podarta na strzępy, a cała koncepcja mechanizmu kontroli i równowagi władz odrzucona, zastąpiona tyranią zwykłej większości, czyli “rządami motłochu”. Nie byłoby prezydenta, Senatu, Sądu Najwyższego, a już z pewnością Kolegium Elektorów. Demonstranci na ulicach mogliby żądać: “Nie ma sprawiedliwości, nie będzie pokoju”, tak jak robiły to “turbas divinas”, czyli “boskie tłumy” (cywilne paramilitarne oddziały szturmowe prezydenta Nikaragui Daniela Ortegi), gdzie przemoc uliczna staje się prawem – na co mógł liczyć lider mniejszości w Senacie Chuck Schumer, gdy wzywał do przemocy wobec sędziów Sądu Najwyższego:

“Chcę ci powiedzieć, Gorsuch; chcę ci powiedzieć, Kavanaugh: rozpętaliście burzę i zapłacicie za to. Nie będziecie wiedzieli, co was uderzyło, jeśli pójdziecie dalej z tymi okropnymi decyzjami”.

Zniknąłby nie tylko konstytucyjny system kontroli i równowagi władz oraz ograniczonych kompetencji, lecz także wszelkie pojęcia osiągnięć i zasług. W USA studenci medycyny i lekarze są awansowani i wybierani ze względu na swoje cechy etniczne, rasowe lub płciowe, z których wszystkie są dziedziczone, a nie “osiągane” – chyba że, jak Ward Churchill czy Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren, dokonujesz “fałszywego przywłaszczenia”, by zaliczyć się do klasy uciskanych. Wielu spośród tych “Demokratycznych Socjalistów” chce obecnie pozbawić finansowania nie tylko policję i straż graniczną, lecz także Departament Obrony. Krótko mówiąc, oznajmiają, że chcieliby oddać kraj przestępcom, handlarzom narkotyków, przemytnikom i krzykaczom. Żadnych więzień, żadnych granic, żadnej odpowiedzialności. W ten sposób znacznie łatwiej przejąć kraj. Najpierw wywołujesz chaos, a potem bohatersko wkraczasz z obietnicami, że go naprawisz – stary numer pod tytułem “jesteś jednocześnie podpalaczem i strażakiem”.

W tym nowym społeczeństwie zasługi odrzuca się jako rezultat “białego przywileju”, zamiast traktować je jako miarę lub wartość osiągnięć. Znaczenie ma wyłącznie kolor skóry lub pochodzenie etniczne. Nawet amerykańskie szkoły medyczne traktowały rasę jako miarę kompetencji medycznych, co doprowadziło w ubiegłym roku do wyraźnego zakazu takiej praktyki.

Gdy zasługi wyrzuca się za burtę, wyniki testów edukacyjnych przestają być potrzebne. Możliwość wyboru szkoły jest demonizowana. Szkoły katolickie? Kolejny przejaw “białego przywileju”. Smithsonian Institution opublikował przewodnik edukacyjny dla uczniów od 3. do 12. klasy, w którym pada stwierdzenie: “Białość: ideologia, która umacnia władzę kosztem innych”.

Ocena nauczania nie opiera się na tym, czy uczniowie ostatecznie cokolwiek wiedzą, lecz wyłącznie na tym, czy “właściwe” treści ideologiczne są przekazywane przez “właściwego” rodzaju nauczyciela, należącego do “właściwej” rasy, grupy etnicznej, płci lub orientacji seksualnej.

Całe oszustwo “różnorodności, równości i inkluzywności” (DEI) stanowi część tej sprytnej kampanii mającej przekształcić Amerykę w kolejne Chiny lub Kubę poprzez wykorzystanie rasy i pochodzenia etnicznego jako dźwigni.

Historia Ameryki, którą należy opowiadać, to na przykład historia jej niezwykłej kampanii na rzecz zniesienia niewolnictwa oraz rozszerzenia wolności na miliardy ludzi na całym świecie.

Fakt, że Stany Zjednoczone odziedziczyły niewolnictwo, umknął autorom odrażającego “Projektu 1619”, dzięki czemu mogli oni przykleić naszym Ojcom Założycielom trwałą etykietę “ciemiężycieli” z powodu niewolnictwa.

Pierwszym aktem ustawodawczym Vermontu, 14. stanu USA, było zniesienie niewolnictwa. Dlaczego nikt w USA nigdy nie protestuje przeciwko niewolnictwu, które nadal istnieje w innych częściach świata?


Peter Huessy jest pracownikiem naukowym (Senior Fellow) w National Institute for Deterrent Studies, a dr Stephen Blank jest pracownikiem naukowym (Senior Fellow) w Foreign Policy Research Institute.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Far-Right AfD Party’s German Election Victory Alarms Jewish Community, Israeli Leaders


Far-Right AfD Party’s German Election Victory Alarms Jewish Community, Israeli Leaders

Ailin Vilches Arguello


Top candidate of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) Ulrich Siegmund speaks accompanied by party co-leaders Alice Weidel and Tino Chrupalla at the AfD election party after polls closed in the Saxony-Anhalt state elections and exit polls were announced, in Magdeburg, Germany, Sept. 6, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Fabrizio Bensch

The German far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party’s historic victory in Saxony-Anhalt has sent shockwaves through the country’s Jewish community, prompting warnings from Israeli officials and political leaders who fear the party’s rising influence could threaten Jewish life and test the country’s longstanding commitment to confronting antisemitism.

The AfD — which Germany’s domestic intelligence service classifies as a right-wing extremist group — recorded its strongest-ever regional result in Sunday’s election in the eastern German state of Saxony-Anhalt.

With its historic victory, the party fell narrowly short of the majority required to establish the country’s first far-right state government since World War II.

The AfD secured 39 of the 83 seats in Saxony-Anhalt’s regional parliament, putting the party three seats below the 42-seat threshold needed to govern on its own without forming a coalition.

Even without an outright majority, the results marked a dramatic electoral breakthrough, with the party winning nearly 44 percent of the vote and roughly doubling its previous support in the state.

Josef Schuster, president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, expressed deep alarm over the result, warning that the AfD’s rising influence could have lasting consequences for Germany’s younger generations and its efforts to preserve an open society.

“I am personally appalled by this election result,” Schuster told the German newspaper WELT. “Over the past few months, it has been clear what goals the AfD is pursuing. Anyone who voted for them today – despite or because of these goals – bears the responsibility for this result.”

“I fear the influence they will have on so many children and young people through a radically altered education policy,” he continued. “Education is the most important foundation for preserving our open society and fighting antisemitism.”

Among its campaign promises, the far-right party has pledged to recast Germany’s approach to teaching history, giving more attention to the country’s pre-World War I and pre-World War II past while scaling back lessons on the Nazi era, part of its broader call for Germans “to move beyond guilt and focus on national pride.”

Israeli Ambassador to Germany Ron Prosor also raised alarm over the AfD’s breakthrough, warning that the party’s record on hostility toward Jews poses serious concerns for the future of Jewish life in Germany, describing antisemitism as a poison that must never be tolerated.

“The election in Saxony-Anhalt this weekend should alarm everyone who cares about the future of Jewish life in Germany,” the Israeli diplomat told the Funke Media Group.

“Just 80 years after the Shoah, a party whose leaders described Berlin’s Holocaust Memorial as a ‘monument of shame’ achieved record gains,’” Prosor continued, using the Hebrew term for the Holocaust. “Germany needs a firewall against antisemitism on all fronts – not just words of condemnation, but concrete action.”

Experts warn that the AfD’s electoral gains are increasingly challenging Germany’s postwar political order, potentially putting pressure on the country’s close ties with Israel and raising concerns over the security and future of Jewish communities and institutions.

Now, Germany’s mainstream political parties face the difficult task of building a broad coalition capable of keeping the AfD out of government, as the election lays bare the deepening political divide between the country’s eastern and western regions.

Some analysts argue that Germany’s political “firewall” against the AfD may have strengthened the party rather than weakened it, allowing the AfD to remain outside government and avoid the difficult compromises and political fallout that come with governing.

At the same time, mainstream parties have struggled to deliver results through fragile coalitions, fueling voter frustration while driving more support toward the far right.

Yet others argue that the AfD’s steady advance has been driven above all by the gradual normalization of far-right ideas, rather than by the party’s exclusion from government alone.

The German party has long faced scrutiny over an extensive record of antisemitic and discriminatory rhetoric, with prominent figures repeatedly seeking to minimize Nazi-era crimes, challenging Germany’s culture of Holocaust remembrance and promoting nationalist positions that have alienated minority communities.

While a single state election cannot define Germany’s broader political landscape and may be less significant in a state that has long supported nationalist parties, far-right movements are gaining traction across Europe, raising fears among some observers of a broader nationalist wave ahead of several closely watched elections.

Sweden is set to hold legislative elections next weekend, while France faces a presidential election next spring, followed by key parliamentary contests in Italy, Spain, and Poland.

According to recent research from the political science department at the University of Amsterdam, more than 23 percent of European voters supported far-right parties in 2026, up from roughly 10 percent a decade ago and about 5 percent in 1995, representing nearly a fivefold increase since the mid-1990s.

Unlike much of Europe, modern Germany has not had a far-right or right-wing populist party lead a national government, a state government, or the administration of a major city.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com