Archives

News From Israel- August 14, 2022

News From Israel- August 14, 2022

ILTV Israel News


 


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com

 


Israeli archaeologist find where the Romans breached Jerusalem’s walls – IAA

Israeli archaeologist find where the Romans breached Jerusalem’s walls – IAA

AARON REICH


In breaching the walls of Jerusalem in 70 CE, the Roman legions stormed the city and destroyed the Second Temple, of the many infamous moments mourned on Tisha Be’av.

.

The Russian Compound excavation site. The ballista stones, the physical evidence of the battle that took place 2000 years ago, are visible on the floor. / (photo credit: YOLI SCHWARTZ/ISRAEL ANTIQUITIES AUTHORITY)

The positions of the Roman army’s ballistae used in their attack on Jerusalem may have been found thanks to archaeological evidence and calculations made by the Israel Antiquities Authority.

The findings come on Tisha Be’av, the Jewish fast day that mourns, among other things, the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem by the Romans during this invasion.

Background: When Romans took Jerusalem

The Roman Empire was the pinnacle superpower of the ancient world and firmly dominated the entirety of the Mediterranean Sea.

Its army, too, was the powerhouse of the era, enforcing the empire’s will on its conquered and subjugated lands.

The imperial legions were vast, strong in number with a vast number of flexible tactics and formations at their disposal, along with their signature innovations and weaponry, such as the ballista.

It was with this might that the Romans, in an army led by Pompey the Great, would ultimately conquer Judea, ruled at the time by the Hasmonean Kingdom, in 63 BCE — which was technically before the birth of the empire and was actually in the tail-end of the Roman Republic.

However, not all of the Jews accepted Roman rule, as while Judea was allowed to be autonomous, they were still heavily beholden to Rome.

Ultimately, in 66 CE, a Jewish revolt erupted against Rome, at the time ruled by Emperor Nero. The Roman legions, led by General Vespasian, were dispatched to quell this uprising.

The revolt was widespread and would last for several years, ultimately ending with the fall of Masada in 73-74 CE. But the most significant battle was the Siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE.

This began after a brief lull in the conflict, caused by Emperor Nero’s death. Vespasian went back to Rome, becoming the new emperor, while his son Titus was now left in command of the legions. He would lay siege to Jerusalem and after a siege of just under five months, would breach into the city and destroy the Second Temple.

This marked the end of a historic period for the Jews, the total destruction of the Second Temple, and is one of the many infamous moments contributing to the mourning day of Tisha Be’av.

The Siege and Destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans Under the Command of Titus, A.D. 70 (credit: DAVID ROBERTS/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS)

How did the Roman army do it?

That question was answered by Israel Antiquities Authority researcher Kfir Arbiv.

Over the course of many years, archaeological excavations were able to uncover a significant number of Roman military equipment in the city. Many of these were found by Arbiv and fellow researcher Dr. Rina Avner in the Russian Compound near the Jerusalem Municipality.

So far, the excavated equipment consists of anything from ballista stones, sling stones, spears, arrowheads, swords and catapults.

In particular, Arbiv focused on the ballista stones.

Kfir Arbiv, Israel Antiquities Authority excavation director, cleans a ballista stone at the Russian Compound excavation site. (credit: YOLI  SCHWARTZ/ISRAEL ANTIQUITIES AUTHORITY)

Ballistae themselves were large weapons of the ancient world that could be described as a sort of gigantic crossbow — though the crossbow itself was a later weapon. 

These contraptions used springs for torsion in order to launch either heavy darts or large stones in siege warfare.

They were first utilized by the ancient Greeks as siege weapons and were later incorporated by the Romans as they continued to expand their presence and adapt their military capabilities. 

Smaller forms of ballista, called scorpio, were also used with more precision.

Overall, though they were used as siege weaponry, ballistae could also be described as an early form of artillery, used to take out fortifications and target soldiers.

This lines up with the Siege of Jerusalem, with the ballista stones found being of varying weight and size, able to be launched in an effort to break through the walls or to hit people and prevent the defenders from trying to come out from cover to strike back. 

Ballista stone balls of different dimensions (credit: Kfir Arbiv/Israel Antiquities Authority)

With this in mind, Arbiv hit the books – and the keyboard.

Much of the battle itself was described by the famed Jewish historian Josephus in his landmark work The History of the Jewish War against the Romans

With this information, Arbiv was able to match it up with his own findings. These were gained through the locations of where the ballistae stones were found and, from there, he calculated where they must have been fired from.

This complex series of calculations had to factor in everything from the location of the city walls, the angles used to launch each stone and what their ranges were and the local topography.

From here, Arbiv helped discover two things: Where much of the Roman artillery was located, and where the Romans probably managed to breach the city.

“Whoever controls this spot, dominates the whole area and the fate of the city.”

Kfir Arbiv

Where did the Romans breach Jerusalem’s walls?

Regarding the location of artillery, a significant amount of ballistae seem to have been placed in Cat’s Square, located around the center of modern Jerusalem.

As for where the Romans likely breached into the city, that would seemingly be the Russian Compound.

Excavations in the area were able to find remnants of the Third Wall, the outermost line of defense of the city. However, this area also had the largest amount of ballistae stones, with hundreds if not thousands found in the area, seemingly directed at this specific spot.

Josephus himself seemed to have indicated s much, with his writings stating that the Romans breached the walls in the northwest.

For Arbiv, the fact that they chose this spot is not at all a surprise.

“Whoever controls this spot, dominates the whole area and the fate of the city,” he explained.

For Israel Antiquities Authority director Eli Eskosido, the findings are significant in helping further validate the records of the Siege of Jerusalem.

“The physical evidence of the huge resources employed by the Roman army in Jerusalem reflects the extremely harsh battles that eventually led to the destruction of the Second Temple,” he explained. 

“Notwithstanding the internal factions and the impossible odds, a small group of Jewish defenders withheld the Romans for a few months until the tragic destruction of the city. The use of up-to-date research methods reveals more and more about the fascinating history of Jerusalem.”

But there may be a lot more to discover in the area, with many weapons and machines used by the Roman legions still unaccounted for.

“We know from the historical sources that the Roman army employed massive siege rams to batter the fortification walls and siege towers that reached the height of the walls,” explained Israel Antiquities Authority Jerusalem region director Amit Reem, “but these have not yet been found in Jerusalem.”


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


The Spielberg Jewish Film Archive – Assignment Tel Aviv

Assignment Tel Aviv

Hebrew University of JerusalemThe Spielberg Jewish Film Archive


Abstract: American journalist Quentin Reynolds reports on the fast-growing city of Tel Aviv.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com

 


News From Israel- August 11, 2022

News From Israel- August 11, 2022

ILTV Israel News


The Likud party primaries are over, and the results may be a bit surprising…

A look at the propaganda machine that is the media coverage in Gaza…

Yet another controversy now erupting around the upcoming World Cup tournament in Qatar.

Will your children grow up Jewish? it all depends on their education!
For eligibility check for FREE Jewish studies in the US, click on the link below: https://bit.ly/3bJQsrQ


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


The Blood Libel That Went Viral: Israel Blamed for Palestinian Islamic Jihad Rocket That Killed Children

The Blood Libel That Went Viral: Israel Blamed for Palestinian Islamic Jihad Rocket That Killed Children

Rachel O’Donoghue


Israel’s Iron Dome anti-missile system fires to intercept a rocket launched from the Gaza Strip towards Israel near Ashdod, Israel August 6, 2022. REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun

“A lie can travel halfway around the world before the truth can get its boots on.”

This quote — frequently attributed to American writer Mark Twain, but traced back to satirist Jonathan Swift — perfectly encapsulates the reaction to reports that an explosion at the Jabaliya camp in Gaza during Operation Breaking Dawn, left several children dead.

Many of the first reports from Gaza claimed that the bloodshed was the result of an Israeli strike.

The IDF, however, acted immediately and released a statement that confirmed it had not targeted its airpower anywhere in the vicinity at the time of the blast.

Later, both video and radar evidence was published online that showed the carnage was in fact caused by a misfired rocket shot by Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) terrorists.

As early as Saturday night — mere minutes after the explosion — a widely circulated video of the rocket showed that it was launched from inside the coastal enclave before sharply turning and losing altitude.

Yet, the initial media reports buried the IDF’s statement, and ignored the video that was available online.



The BBC opened its coverage of Operation Breaking Dawn with the following two paragraphs:

Israel has killed a second top militant from the Palestinian Islamic Jihad group, as the death toll continues to rise from air strikes in Gaza.

Six children and several PIJ fighters — including leaders Khaled Mansour and Tayseer Jabari – are among the 32 Palestinians reported to have died.

It is only further down in the article that the reader is told that there is evidence that Israel was not responsible for the deaths in Jabaliya, although the nature of this evidence — incontrovertible video proof — is omitted:

Gaza’s health ministry blamed “Israeli aggression” for the deaths of Palestinians, and for the more than 200 people wounded.

Israel accused PIJ militants of accidentally causing at least some of those deaths – claiming on Saturday that the group fired a stray rocket killing multiple children in Jabalia, in the Gaza Strip. The BBC has not been able to independently verify this claim.

The Daily Mail also covered events coming out of Gaza, with a story that focused on the death toll following what the publication described as a “three-day bombardment” of the Gaza Strip.

In The Daily Mail’s subheading bullet points, the number of children killed is emphasized:

  • Six children are among the dead since the conflict began Friday, while 275 people have been wounded […]
  • But the attacks have now killed 31 Palestinians, more than half of which are believed to be innocent civilians.

Again, no mention is made of the misfired rocket that killed scores of these civilians, or the fact that both Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Gaza’s terrorist leaders in Hamas are known to hide weapons arsenals and launch sites within highly-populated civilian areas.

The international news network France 24 was equally reckless in its reportage. A piece, titled, “Israel kills second Islamic Jihad leader, Gaza death toll mounts,” opens thus:

An Israeli airstrike killed a second senior commander in the Palestinian militant group Islamic Jihad, the fighters said Sunday as the death toll from violence in Gaza rose to 31, including six children, according to Palestinian health officials. As Israel pressed on with its assault, Palestinian militants retaliated with barrages of rockets fired at Israel.

The suggestion made by France 24 is that Israel is responsible for the deaths of all of these civilians, with not a single mention in the entire piece of the that errant PIJ rockets claimed innocent lives.

Meanwhile, coverage of Operation Breaking Dawn on social media was no less irresponsible.

Numerous Twitter accounts — collectively boasting millions of followers — were swift to condemn “Israeli bombs” for killing children in Gaza (see herehereherehere, and here, for example).

Many accounts even shared the claim that Israel had committed a“massacre“ — an accusation that is reminiscent of ancient antisemitic blood libels.

In contrast to such conspiracy mongering, the IDF’s speedy response to dispel erroneous reports that it had been behind the Jabaliya strike was reported on by several mainstream Israeli publications, which noted that many high-profile news organizations had updated their reportage to reflect this fact (see here and here).

The Israeli military has and must continue to be proactive in setting the record straight, and we commend news outlets around the world that acted quickly to include emerging evidence exonerating the Jewish state as it became available.

However, the onus is on these publications to not jump to conclusions in the first place: it is a well-established fact that rockets fired from the Gaza Strip frequently fall short. We saw this take place repeatedly during the May 2021 Israel-Hamas conflict.

In the future, news outlets must make it clear from the outset that they do not have all the facts at any given point during a fast-moving story, and not unequivocally state which side is responsible for a particular strike.

To simply assume or suggest that Israel is at fault is nothing less than an egregious act of journalistic malfeasance. With Jonathan Swift’s wise observation in mind, the media must remember the dangers of publishing first and only asking questions later.


The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.

Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com