Archive | September 2022

Me, U, Baku, Quba

Me, U, Baku, Quba

JOSHUA COHEN


ALL PHOTOS: MAX AVDEEV

How a tiny enclave of Mountain Jews in Azerbaijan produced some of the former Soviet world’s richest men.

One thing about dictatorships, they’re either very expensive or very cheap to fly to. There’s no such thing as a midrange regime: Extremities charge extremities. I know a guy, it cost him $4,600 just to get to North Korea (Newark-Beijing-Dandong, and then across the DPRK border in a Jeep). I know another guy, it cost him $2,800 just to get to Laos (Newark-Tokyo-Bangkok-Vientiane). I flew nonstop from JFK to Baku, Azerbaijan, visa included, for all of $500. The plane was a brand-new Airbus A340; the pilots were military-grade, and the senior or just older pilot wore medals on his chest that resembled poker-chips: two black, one yellow, which at Trump casinos, back when there were Trump casinos, would’ve been redeemable for $1,200. The flight attendants, uniformed in sky-gray and blood-red, were gorgeous: The men were creatic gym creatures bursting out of their shirts, the women were dripping with makeup and curvaceous, their skirts slit as high as it gets, at least in the world of Islamic female flight attendant fashion. The three exorbitant meals they served over the course of the 10-hour, 30-minute, 5,812 mile/9,353 kilometer flight were culturally specific (mutton stews and breads) and hot (very hot). The in-flight-entertainment selection was operated by individual seatback touchscreen and generous and included, alongside the standard Hollywood and Russian offerings, an impressive selection of Azeri content, all of it bearing the seal of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism of Azerbaijan. I tried to catch up on Star Wars, the prequel trilogy, in order to prepare for the upcoming release of the sequel trilogy, though by the middle of Episode II, Attack of the Clones, I’d had enough and switched to an Azeri property, but it was only in Azeri—no subtitles, no dub—and so I wasn’t able to ascertain whether the lawyer was the good guy, or the bad guy, or not a lawyer at all, and instead a slick plastic surgeon on trial for corrupting his wife.

Most of the plane was empty, with no more than two dozen other passengers, about half of whom would terminate in Baku, with the other half Israeli—Russian-Israelis, Parsim (Persian Israeli), and Teimanim (Yemeni Israelis). Leave it to the Jews to find out that AZAL, the Azerbaijani government’s official airline, or flag-carrier, had been subsidizing ticket prices from America, and so that the cheapest way to get from New York to Tel Aviv was to go through Baku and wait. I’m not sure that this subsidy policy was created for the express purpose of saving Jews money, but then neither am I sure that it was created to encourage visits by American tourists and business travelers. Instead, dictator president Ilham Aliyev just cares about being able to boast domestically that his country now has a biweekly direct flight to New York. The airport, which Aliyev is constantly renovating, as if he were intent on expanding it in tandem with the expansion of the universe, is named for his father, Heydar Aliyev, the previous dictator president. At its center is a glitzy foreign-flights terminal that resembles the Galactic Senate from Star Wars. The landing was baby-gentle; the deplaning swift; the Israelis dispersed to window shop duty-free caviar and Rolexes until their departure for Ben-Gurion. I was processed through immigration and customs, asked no questions, but photographed twice. The first person in Azerbaijan to ask me any questions was my cabdriver: What you doing here? And, What you pay?

I answered the what I doing here? with, I’m a tourist, because to say that I’d come to this majority-Muslim authoritarian country as a writer, let alone as a journalist, would be like saying I’d come to prey on your youth, or to masturbate into the Caspian. I answered the what I pay? with, How about 20 manats?—because that was the amount suggested by “Zaur J” on a msgboard on tripadvisor.com. Other posts had suggested 14, 16, 25, 30, and taking the 116 shuttlebus to the 28th of May train station for 40 qepik, which was roughly a quarter. I settled on 20, because it wasn’t my money. A bit over $12. The driver suggested 25. Which was a bit over $15.

He still hadn’t asked where we were going.

Azerbaijan is a nation bordered by threats and built atop lies. This makes it not too different from any other nation, except: To the south is Iran, to the north is Georgia and a hunk of Russian Dagestan (which doesn’t do much to buffer the rumblings of Chechnya and Ossetia); to the west is a short border with Turkey and a long troubled ton of border shared with hated Armenia, with which Azerbaijan has been engaged in an on-and-off war over the Nagorno-Karabakh exclave since 1988; while to the east is the largest enclosed inland body of water on earth, the oil-and-natural-gas-rich Caspian, whose greatest local landlord is SOCAR (State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic), which partners with and administers contracts for the AIOC (the Azerbaijan International Operating Company), a consortium of extractors headed by BP (UK), and including—in order of declining equity—Chevron (USA), INPEX (Japan), Statoil (Norway), ExxonMobil (USA), TPAO (Turkey), ITOCHU (Japan), and ONGC Videsh (India). To make it clearer, Azerbaijan is a seabound country with dwindling but still significant reserves of oil, outsize reserves of natural gas, the highest Shia population percentage in the world after Iran, an ongoing conflict with an Orthodox Christian neighbor, close-enough experience of the Georgian/Abkhazian and Chechen Wars, a sense of Russia as representing the highest of culture, yet a sense of Putin as the lowest of thugs, bent on recapturing a toxic mashup of Soviet/Tsarist glory, and so perpetually reconnoitering the Central Asian steppes for the next Donbass, or Crimea. Dropping oil and natural gas revenues have sparked a rising interest in the previously inimical—because Sunni—Salafism blowing north from Iranian Kurdistan and south from Ciscaucasia. Over 1,500 Azerbaijani citizens are currently in Syria fighting for ISIS.

Baku, the capital, a city of approximately two million people, is a brash glam cesspit of new construction—newly stalled since the global banking crisis and again, since oil and gas have plummeted—surrounded by ruined farmland. To pass from Baku to the countryside is to pass from the twenty-first century to the nineteenth, skipping the twentieth entirely, which was such a downer anyway, everyone pretends not to notice. Throughout the country there isn’t a dominant culture, but an only-culture. Azerbaijani state power, though notionally secular, has the force of Islam and the same vertical structure: bow and scrape. The country’s best criminals are treated like businessmen, and the country’s best businessmen happen to be members of the ruling family. To get a good job, you have to have good connections. To get good connections you have to be born to a good family. To be born to a good family you have to be blessed by a good God. If you find yourself—like, say, the 7.4 million people in Azerbaijan who don’t live in Baku—unlucky enough to be excluded from this system of patronage, or nepotistic oligarchy, you’re fucked. All you can do, in your fuckedness, is put on a fake face and submit. Spend all your money on your car, or your clothes, so that you seem wealthier. Name your firstborn male child after the president or the president’s father so that he seems more employable. Have more female children, because only women can marry up. Take pride in the new pedestrian promenade, along the waterfront. In the skyscrapers you don’t work in. The malls you can’t afford to shop in. Embrace the falsehoods and lead a double life.

So, the truth of why I’d come here—if truth can be spoken, or even spoken of, in Azeri (whose word for truthhaqq, also means justice, and payment):

I was in Baku, only to get the hell out of Baku—to go to the edge of Azerbaijan and up into the Caucasus, the easternmost of the western mountains, or the westernmost of the eastern mountains, where, tectonically, Europe crashes into Asia. I was headed there to enact a submission of my own: to fall down at the Adidas-sneakered feet of the Mountain Jews—a sect of overwhelmingly short, hairy, dark-skinned Semites—who, as craggy cloudbound slope-dwellers, seemed perfectly positioned to offer me the wisdom I was seeking, without any annoying lectures on Orientalism.

.

I wanted to ask these Jews—these fellow Jews—what to do: about how to handle, how personally to handle, for example, the tragedy of capitalism, as it withers into kleptocracy; or Islamic fundamentalism, and the compounding quandary that is Zionism; about how to survive as a writer, when 99% of the world doesn’t read, and when the 1% that does just reads to get offended; about how to deal with publishers, who underpay; and with editors, who overedit; with publications that cut columns and cut rates; with schools that string me along as a lecturer without insurance.

While I didn’t seriously suppose that the Mountain Jews had all the answers, I did suspect, or hope, that they themselves would be the answers. After all, they—their community—might comprise the longest-running mafia in recorded history.

Or semi-recorded—because the Mountain Jews have never written their own history, because writing is too fixed, too fixing, and surely too unremunerative. Instead, they abide in strangers’ pages, shrouded in the oral.

Among their legends are the following, which I’ll list in order from “OK, I’ll Give You the Benefit of the Doubt,” to “Definitely Didn’t Happen”:

Toward the end of the eighth century BCE, the Assyrians conquered the Northern Kingdom of Israel, Samaria, and deported between one and ten of its tribes—between one and ten of the so-called Lost Tribes—for resettlement in their capital, Nineveh, present-day Mosul. But the Assyrian king, Ashur, whom the Mountain Jews associate with Shalmaneser V, mentioned in II Kings, grew so enraged by the Israelites for refusing to forsake their God and for the success they had in commerce that he exiled them to the edge of the empire—to the Caucasus Mountains, where they flourished.

Toward the end of the eighth century BCE, Hoshea, last of the Israelite kings, attempted to gain his kingdom’s independence from Assyria and, as recorded in II Kings, stopped paying the official tribute—10 talents of gold, 1,000 talents of silver—upon Shalmeneser V’s ascension to the throne. Shalmaneser V moved to recoup his losses by imprisoning Hoshea, laying siege to Samaria, and seizing the property of between one and ten of its tribes—the property of between one and ten of the so-called Lost Tribes—whom he or his successor, Sargon II, exiled to the edge of the empire—to the Caucasus Mountains, where they flourished.

Toward the end of the eighth century BCE, under the reign of Hoshea, around 20,000 Israelites fled the destruction of their kingdom—or left to seek unimperiled trade routes between east and west—or traveled en masse to Nineveh to post bail and free Hoshea from debtors prison, but failed—or traveled en masse to press an alliance against the Assyrians with the Egyptian King So (either Tefnakht of Sais or Osorkon IV of Tanis) but went astray. They passed through Assyria, Babylonia, and Persia before settling atop the Caucasus Mountains, where they flourished.

The more scholarly proposals of Mountain Jewish origin, the few of them there are, prove just as fascinating/unsatisfactory:

Jews came from the Israelite Kingdom to Persia ca. eighth century BCE; Persian Jews came to Greater Caucasia—the area between the Black and Caspian Seas—ca. fifth century CE. With the incursions of Goths and/or Huns from the Black Sea region, across the Pontic steppe, the Parthian and/or Sassanid Empires (third century BC to third century CE, the former) (third century CE to seventh century CE, the latter) required a border defense force. Considering the Jews to be exemplary warriors, the Parthian and/or Sassanid kings resettled them in the Caucasus.

In the fifth century CE, Sassanid King Yazdegerd II forced all the peoples he conquered to convert to Zoroastrianism and embarked on violent persecutions of Assyrian and Armenian Christians, and Persian and Armenian Jews, with the result that the latter two fled, either together or separately, to the Caucasus.

By the eighth century CE, a nomadic Turkic people called the Khazars, or Kuzari, had relinquished their syncretic religion of Tengriism (worship of the Turkic sky god Tengri), Islam, Christianity, and Judaism, and converted exclusively to Judaism. Formerly a trading partner between Byzantium and the Sassanids, and then between Byzantium and the Ummayads, the Khazars now became enemies of both, as well as of Kievn Rus, whose prince, Sviatoslav I, razed their de facto capital, Atil—located along the Volga—whose population sought shelter in the Caucasus.

In or around the ninth century CE, one or more of the minor khanates around the Caspian attempted to break what it or they regarded as a Jewish monopoly on maritime and overland trade by expelling its or their Jews from the coastal plain to the Caucasus, where they flourished. Or one or more of the minor khanates sent its or their Jews up into the mountains to act as a frontier guard. Or sent its or their Jews up into the mountain passes to act as basically inspectors and toll collectors—enforcing tariffs, imposing duties. Or else the Jews, either compelled to quit or perhaps even quitting the coastal plain of their own accord, went rogue up in the Caucasus, and appointed themselves frontier guards, inspectors, and/or toll collectors—extorting tribute and/or protection payments from any and all passing through.

By the late 1600s, Jews of Persian descent, fleeing the persecutions of the Persian Safavids for the fraying borders of the Lak Gazikumukh Shamkhalate, had established themselves on the shores of the Caspian near Derbent—today the second-largest city in Dagestan, and the southernmost city in Russia—in a settlement called Aba-Sava. The Shamkhalate, in a bid to prevent the Safavids from advantaging its weaknesses and annexing its holdings, struck an alliance with Catherine the Great. The Jews, who traded with everyone—the Shamkhalate, the Russians, the Safavids—had alliances with none. Aba-Sava was destroyed in either the second, or third, Russo-Persian War, and its Jews were half slaughtered, half scattered, and found shelter only under the Russian-aligned reign of Fatali Khan, ruler of the Quba Khanate, and conqueror of Derbent, who dispersed them to remote mountain towns of his dominion.

Regardless of which interpretation you hold with, the situation seems to be this: Somehow, a loose group of Jews that spoke a dialect of Persian that contained elements of Hebrew—a dialect now called Judeo-Tat, or Juhuri, or Gorsky—found themselves virtually alone high up in the rebarbative Caucasus, where—for a period of 200 years, or 2,000 years, give or take a grain of salt—they seem to have controlled most of the mountain passes, and so most of the caravanning traffic, on that tangle of routes as gossamer as thread that the German geographer Ferdinand von Richthofen (1833–1905) immortalized as the Silk Road (die Seidenstraße).

Few goods could cross the Pontic steppe—between Persia, Arabia, India, China, etc., and Europe—without the Mountain Jews taking a cut. Few good merchants could avoid saddling and gapping their peaks—unless, just before the Bolshevik Revolution, they wanted to take the Transcaspian Railway from Tashkent, Samarqand, or Bukhara, to Turkmenbashi, and then a steamer across the Caspian Sea to Baku, then the Trans-Caucasian Railway to Batumi, and then a steamer across the Black Sea to Odessa—unless, just after the Bolshevik Revolution, they wanted to take an airplane.

But then even since the invention of the airplane and intermodal freight, the Mountain Jews haven’t done too poorly.

Of the approximately 200,000 Judeo-Tats, or Juhuros, or Gorsky Jews in existence (gora means mountain in Russian), half live in Israel, and about 20,000 in the States; many of the rest are in Russia, mostly in Moscow—and in Azerbaijan, mostly in Baku. Only a few still live in their ancestral auls (fortified, or once upon a time fortified, settlements), midway up the flanks of mountains along two of the Caucasus’s three major ranges, many of which are inaccessible today because the lines they obey are of faults, not borders; and though the armies camped atop the crust can’t stop the sediment, Azerbaijanis can and do stop Armenians from crossing, and Armenians can and do stop Azerbaijanis from crossing, and each stops the other from crossing into the de facto independent but unrecognized republic of Nagorno-Karabakh; Turks stop Armenians from crossing and Armenians stop Turks from crossing; Georgians stop Russians from crossing, and Russians stop Georgians from crossing (not only the Russian republics of Dagestan, Chechnya, Ingushetia, North Ossetia, Kabardino-Balkaria, and Karachay-Cherkessia, but also the partially recognized breakaway-from-Georgia state of South Ossetia; the partially recognized breakaway-from-Georgia state of Abkhazia; and the breakaway-from-Georgian autonomous republic of Adjara).

The Mountain Jews are a sect of overwhelmingly short, hairy, dark-skinned Semites, who, as craggy cloudbound slope-dwellers, seemed perfectly positioned to offer me the wisdom I was seeking.

Because if Azerbaijan has become the Mountain Jews’ sanctuary, Russia is now their bazaar—its appetites have made their fortune. Mountain Jews of my own generation, who came of age under Yeltsin’s two terms of larceny and greed, moved into Moscow, St. Petersburg, and the vast cities of Siberia that have less name recognition, but more manufacturing infrastructure and coal mines. There they went about privatizing. Here’s what privatizing means: When a state that owns everything disintegrates, suddenly everything’s up for grabs; if you want a shop, or a factory, or an entire industry, say, you just show up and claim it as yours; the cops can’t kick you out, because there aren’t any cops—the cops don’t stay cops when they’re not getting paid—and so you dig in, and, should other parties arrive to stake their claims, you just have to hope that you have more and bigger men, and more and bigger guns, than they do. To give two examples—not to accuse them of having done anything like this, but merely to admire them if they had—God Nisanov (b. 1972), and Zarah Iliev (b. 1966). Both moved to Moscow in the early ’90s and immediately went underground, taking over kiosks throughout the drafty cavernous Metro, whose stations had been designed to serve as bomb-shelters, but now were also becoming groceries and malls. Nisanov and Iliev began shipping produce to the capital, setting up construction firms, and investing in real estate. Today, they’re the largest commercial real-estate developers in Moscow, with properties including the Evropeyskiy Shopping Center, the Radisson Royal Hotel, the Radisson Slavyanskaya Hotel, myriad office parks, and wholesale and retail commodity markets (food, appliances, electronics, etc.). As of 2015, Forbes estimated the net worth of each at $4.9 billion, which tied them for the title of twenty-fourth richest person in Russia. In 2014, Nisanov was awarded the Order of Friendship by Putin and was elected to the executive committee of the World Jewish Congress.

Both Nisanov and Iliev were born in the most venerable of the Mountain Jewish auls, Quba. Pronounced Guba. Actually, they’re from a Jewish enclave located just outside Quba, which in Azeri is called Qırmızı Qəsəbə, and in Russian is called Yevreiskaya Sloboda (Jewish Town), though under the Soviet period its name was changed to Krasnaya Sloboda (Red Town). Now, it shouldn’t seem particularly strange that a village of fewer than 3,800 people produced two childhood friends who grew up to become billionaires together. But it should seem particularly strange that this village currently boasts four billionaires, and at least twelve (by one count) and eighteen (by another) worth in the hundreds of millions. They include, as already noted, major property developers and commodity importers, but also car importers, clothing importers, and the managers of the Azerbaijani government’s oil and gas portfolios.

I’d been introduced to the existence of the Mountain Jews, and of Quba, by a man a friend of mine met at the banya—a Russian bathhouse, in Brooklyn. This man happened to know, or in the course of sweating conversation claimed to know, my friend’s relative, a Brooklyn (non-Mountain) Jew who does something I’d prefer not to understand with slot machines, and has spent time as a ward of the state. I was told that this man from Quba, whose phone number my friend obtained for me, imported apples to New York—to the Big Apple, which, last time I checked, grows plenty of its own …

MAX AVDEEV

.

In any event, I called the man’s number, introduced myself, in English, as a novelist—not as a journalist. I figured, because my friend had told him to expect the call, that he already had my name, and I was searchable online; I also figured the man lived in America, he knew what a novelist was—he knew that it meant “vicarious thrillseeker,” or “coward.” He immediately tried frustrating my interest, but I continued to pester, and finally got him to set a meeting. Which he canceled. I got him to set another meeting, and he canceled again, but at least had pretensions to courtesy, and txted me a local, Baku, number. I searched the number online, and it was the same one listed on the site for the Mountain Jewish community office, whose address was the same as that of Mountain Jewish central synagogue. But by the time I realized all that, I’d already signed a contract, and a check for expenses had cleared my account. Not only that: I’d already flown halfway across the globe and was sitting on the bed of my hotel, the Intourist, laptop on my lap, phone suctioned to my cheek, being reminded—as the number I kept dialing kept ringing—why I’d given up writing nonfiction, for fiction …

I went to the address listed on the site, ostensibly just a leisurely stroll from the Intourist, but either the address was wrong, or the street sign was: Under the Aliyevs, many of the streets in Baku have been stripped of their Russian names and given appellations in Azeri. Some of the more conscientious businesses list both street names on their sites. Most, however, don’t bother. Then there’s the issue of Azeri orthography, which further complicates map usage. Formerly, Azeri had been written in Perso-Arabic; in the 1920s the Latinesque Common Turkic alphabet was adopted; in 1939, the Soviets forced the adoption of the Cyrillic alphabet; after Sovietism, Latinesque Common Turkic was reinstated, and it was only in 1992 that the schwa, or ə, so prevalent in the name of the street I was searching for—Şəmsi Bədəlbəyli—was called into service to replace the diaeresistic—umlauted—a. One map listed Şəmsi Bədəlbəyli as Shamsi Bedelbeyli, and another as Shämsi Bädälbäyli (apparently a formidable Azeri theater actor and director). Whatever its spelling, the boulevard I eventually stumbled upon was a double-boulevard, and wide, but composed of many tiny lanes thronged with many tiny cars; its northbound and southbound congeries were divided by an island of freshly planted parkland—the grass not yet sprouted over the sprinklerheads—beyond which, on the distant side, was the dormant worksite of a massive condo project: Beaux-Arts trimmings atop concrete bunkers separated by gravel lots like bulldozer caravanserais. Catercorner to the condos, I found it: the community office, the central synagogue—the Baku HQ of the Mountain Jews. It was an immense new building of austere Art Deco detailing that, given its sharpcornered cleanliness and shine, seemed two-dimensional, like an architectural rendering, a placard of itself: This Will Be Built On This Site.

It was amazing to me that this structure had another dimension—it was amazing that I was able to step inside. Though only for a moment.

A man strode up and, in response to my asking in Hebrew, said he spoke Hebrew. He was tall, skinny like he had a parasite, and wore a flatcap and trenchcoat indoors. He was between thirty and forty, I’d guess, but had a sparse scraggly beard—like he’d five-fingered it off the face of a surly teenager. He wouldn’t give his name—I mean his own name—or he couldn’t. It turned out that he couldn’t speak Hebrew, or what he spoke of it wasn’t just jumbled, but jumbled with rigor: morning (boker) was evening (erev) and vice-versa, six (sheysh) was seven (sheva) and vice-versa, the ark (aron) was a prayerbook (siddur). After showing me around the synagogue proper, he took me into the facility’s community center portion and showed me a wall of portraits of Mountain Jewish heroes of Azerbaijan’s wars, and another wall of portraits of Mountain Jewish leaders posing alongside Putin, Netanyahu, both the Aliyevs, George W. Bush, Sheldon Adelson, and assorted Azerbaijani mullahs from the government’s Committee for Religious Organizations. Then he hit me up for a donation—he didn’t confuse the word for charity, tzedakah. I gave him 5 manats, and asked if he knew any Mountain Jews who’d be willing to take me to Quba. He shook his head—meaning he didn’t know? or didn’t understand?—shook my hand, and ushered me out the door.

From the six or so years I lived and worked as a journalist throughout Eastern Europe, I was used to this stripe of wariness. No one who grew up in an authoritarian regime likes to or, honestly, can, answer a question directly. Everyone hesitates, dissembles, feels each other out. Feels out, that is, the type and degree of trouble that truthfulness, if they’re even capable of truthfulness, might get them into. In most post-Soviet countries this Cold War ice can usually be broken or, at a minimum, thawed, by a bribe, or through the vigorous application of alcohol. But here, in this Muslim country whose signature intoxicant was tea, alcohol wasn’t an option.

So I headed back to Brooklyn.

By which I mean: I went to find the Azerbaijan Chabad House.

Chabad Lubavitch is a Hasidic religious movement based in Brooklyn, which—like a yarmulke-wearing, spiritually focused version of a UN taskforce or NGO—dispatches its rabbis all over the world, to provide essential religious services in places where there aren’t many Jews—in Asia, Africa, even Antarctica, though they’re especially active in places where there haven’t been many Jews for a while, thanks to the Soviets, or Nazis. They’re basically a missionary organization, except they don’t convert so much as reclaim: They bring the unaffiliated back into the fold. Now, that’s a laudable brief for an organization to have, but there’s also a dark side, in that Chabad, at one extreme, is something of a messianic cult (some of the rabbis proclaim an uncomfortable fealty to their deceased leader, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Lubavitcher rebbe), and insists on imposing its parochial brand of Ashkenazi Judaism—Eastern European Hasidic Judaism—no matter the local tradition, or preference.

There’s also this pesky issue that a few of their rabbinic emissaries have had with, OK, money-laundering.

What might’ve licensed that behavior is a quirk of history: European Jews, not just in the East but throughout the continent, had almost always been required by the governments of the countries they lived in to identify as Jewish. Even after forced registrations became census requests, Jews tended to continue the practice on their own: If they gave charity to or attended their synagogue, there was a fair chance their home city or province’s community had their name and address on file. These community rolls made the Nazi genocide that much more efficient. After the fall of Sovietism, amid the aforementioned rash of privatization, nascent independent countries like Poland and Czechoslovakia found themselves steeped in unclaimed property, a lot of which had belonged to Jews, a lot of whom were dead. Meanwhile, young ambitious Jews of the postwar generations, many with limited Jewish education and even limited Jewish identification, were busy reorganizing their official communities into nonprofit religious entities. Having varying levels of access to their prewar rolls, they applied to state, provincial, and city governments, not just for the restitution of their rightful infrastructure—their synagogues, and cemeteries—but also for the restitution of the properties of their exterminated members who’d left no next of kin. Not many of these Jewish communities had rabbis; Chabad had rabbis—trained in America and Israel. Chabad sent its rabbis to open Chabad Houses—from which they directed prayers, classes, food-and-clothing drives, and lifecycle ceremonies (mostly funerals)—and while the preponderance of the sect’s emissaries stuck to mission principles and successfully renewed Jewish life, a few were tempted, or invited, to infiltrate the administrations of their governmentally-sanctioned communities, and took up posts as official Chief or Head Rabbis—which gave them nominal power over the management of community real-estate portfolios. Some of this real estate was extraordinarily lucrative. For instance: much of the downtown tourist districts of Krakow and Prague. Local influential Jews, inured to the inversions of Sovietism, in which the state was the criminal, and they were merely businessmen, would cut deals with the Chabad rabbis assigned to them, supporting the movement and smoothing its way in return for using this reclaimed infrastructure to clean their money—say, a Russian Jew from Odessa who in the 1990s amid the ludicrous inflation and loan defaults of independent Ukraine gets involved in the counterfeit luggage racket, and launders his profits through a storefront in a community-owned, because community-restituted, building that before it’d been nationalized by the Soviets and devastated by the Nazis had belonged to a Jewish family that’d been liquidated in the camp at Bogdanovka. I once, at a very tender, pious, and moronic age, tried to report on this phenomenon—a phenomenon that, in retrospect, I now find utterly rational and tolerable—and, in return for my sanctimony, in the course of a single day, one man threatened my life, and another man handed me an envelope crammed with cash that kept me housed and fed and working on a novel for nearly all of 2004. Suffice it to say, I’m no Chabad booster. But still, if I could never completely bring myself to trust Hasidim, I could at least trust Hasidim to be Hasidim.

read more here


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


One-Man Show About Polish Resistance Fighter, World War II Hero Jan Karski Premieres in New York

One-Man Show About Polish Resistance Fighter, World War II Hero Jan Karski Premieres in New York

Shiryn Ghermezian


A sculpture in the Polish city of Krakow showing Holocaust hero Jan Karski. Photo: Screenshot.

An off-Broadway solo performance about the World War II Polish resistance fighter and hero Jan Karski premiered this month at the Polonsky Shakespeare Center in New York City.

“Remember This: The Lesson of Jan Karski, presented by Theatre for a New Audience (TFANA), is a story of “moral courage and individual responsibility” starring Oscar nominee and “Nomadland” actor David Strathairn as Karski, who died in 2000.

Karski was captured by the German invading forces while serving in the Polish army in 1939 but escaped when he was being deported to a POW camp. He went on to serve in the Polish underground resistance.

In 1942, Karski risked his life by transporting a report that provided first-hand eyewitness testimony about the horrors taking place in Nazi-occupied Poland, including in the Warsaw Ghetto and a Nazi-run transit camp. He traveled to London, relayed the report to the Polish government-in-exile, and also met with then-British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and other politicians, journalists, and public figures. Karski afterwards went on to the United States, where he met with US President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

“Remember This: The Lesson of Jan Karski” was created at The Laboratory for Global Performance and Politics at Georgetown University, where Karski earned his doctorate and taught for four decades after World War II. The solo performance is directed by Derek Goldman, who worked with Clark Young on creating a script almost solely based on Karski’s own words with contributions from his former students and colleagues.

“Remember This” premiered in 2019 at Georgetown University and then played in London at the 75th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp. It has also been performed in Washington, D.C, and Chicago.

In an address to Holocaust scholars at the US State Department in 1981, Karski, a devout Catholic, said, “My faith makes me say that humanity has committed a second original sin by allowing the Holocaust. This sin will haunt humanity until the end of the world. It haunts me. I want it to stay that way.” The Jan Karski Educational Foundation and the Jan Karski Society were both established in his memory.

“Remember This: The Lesson of Jan Karski” will run at the Polonsky Shakespeare Center through October 9.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Film “Orlęta. Grodno ’39” to fikcja, ale wśród obrońców miasta był prawdziwy żydowski bohater

Kadr z filmu Orlęta. Grodno ’39. To jeden z filmów, które wyprodukowała TVP, więc też o nich informuje (Fot. Magdalena Górfińska / WFDiF / TVP)


Film “Orlęta. Grodno ’39” to fikcja, ale wśród obrońców miasta był prawdziwy żydowski bohater

Andrzej Brzeziecki


Butelki z benzyną rzucane w radzieckie czołgi świadczą tyleż o bohaterstwie mieszkańców Grodna, co o rozpaczliwej sytuacji ówczesnej Polski. Obejrzałem film “Orlęta. Grodno ’39.


Film „Orlęta. Grodno ’39” Krzysztofa Łukaszewicza wzbudza skrajne opinie. Nie podoba się prawicy, nie podoba się środowiskom żydowskim. To, że jest atakowany z dwóch stron, akurat może dobrze o nim świadczyć. Pewnie, jest pełen uproszczeń, skrótów i nieścisłości – bo to film fabularny.  

Byłoby jednak niedobrze, gdyby dyskusja o filmie utknęła na wątku żydowskim. Akurat w tym w filmie antysemityzm Polaków ukazany jest tak wyraźne, że wręcz można się zastanawiać, co żydowski chłopiec, czyli główny bohater Leoś, widział w polskiej kulturze, że tak bardzo chciał się stać jej częścią? 

Spór o historię obrony Grodna i film Łukaszewicza skupił się na relacjach polsko-żydowskich, podczas gdy była to konfrontacja II Rzeczypospolitej ze Związkiem Radzieckim. Dziwne, że w państwie rządzonym od 2015 r. przez ludzi tak przykładających wagę do patriotycznej tradycji nie doczekaliśmy się poważnej, nowoczesnej monografii „wojny polsko-sowieckiej”. Dysponujemy jednak opracowaniami wcześniejszymi, pozwalającymi ujrzeć tę skomplikowaną historię. 

Zardzewiały nóż w niepewnej ręce 

Stalin od 1 września z niepokojem śledził przebieg wydarzeń w Polsce i wokół niej. Najpierw bał się, że Wielka Brytania i Francja skutecznie uderzą na Niemcy. W efekcie będą one miały poważne trudności w walce na dwa fronty i cała awantura, w którą się zaangażował 23 sierpnia, okaże się także i dla niego dość ryzykowna. Wolał jak najdłużej zachować pozycję neutralnego obserwatora. 

Gdy zorientował się, że zachodni sojusznicy Polski nie kwapią się z odsieczą, zaczął z kolei niepokoić się zbyt szybkim postępem wojsk Hitlera. Mogły one zepchnąć Polaków na wschód, zająć wyznaczone cele i wtedy Stalin musiałby się sam uporać z pozostałymi polskimi oddziałami. Berlin ponaglał i pytał się o termin uderzenia, Stalin jednak czekał, aż  Polacy się wykrwawią, by wtedy wbić im nóż w plecy.

Może podświadomie czuł dla nich respekt wyniesiony z walk w 1920 r., a może zdawał sobie sprawę, choćby częściowo, w jakim stanie jest jego armia? W końca sam ją do tego stanu doprowadził szaloną czystką, która kosztowała życie więcej radzieckich dowódców niż jakakolwiek z wojen. Tak czy inaczej wydany w końcu rozkaz dla radzieckich wojsk dotyczył rozbicia polskich wojsk, a nie rzekomego wyzwolenia bratnich narodów Białorusinów i Ukraińców.  

W Armii Czerwonej panował jednak totalny chaos. Jednostki wyznaczone do zajęcia Polski nie miały pełnych stanów osobowych. Brakowało także sprzętu i paliwa. Bywało, że żołnierze nie mieli nawet mundurów i nosili cywilne ubrania, łykowe kapcie – niektórzy chodzili nawet boso. 

Radzieckie czołgi były przestarzałe i awaryjne. W efekcie więcej ich Armia Czerwona straciła w wyniku awarii niż w czasie walk z Polakami. Lotnictwo, które wyznaczono do ataku na Polskę, wciąż posługiwało się stareńkimi i powolnymi dwupłatowcami. Sprawiały one pilotom kłopoty. W przeddzień ataku w wyniku zderzenia z innym samolotem zginął pod Orszą as lotnictwa i dwukrotny Bohater Związku Radzieckiego Siergiej Gricewiec.

Morale żołnierzy też pozostawiało sporo do życzenia. Jeden z pracowników polskiej ambasady na chwilę przed 17 września był świadkiem wiecu w parku Gorkiego w Moskwie. W założeniu miał on wywołać nastroje antypolskie, ale zebrani, słysząc o cierpieniach braci Białorusinów i Ukraińców, uznali, że ich Armia Czerwona wkrótce zacznie wojnę z wrednymi Niemcami – w tym duchu wznosili okrzyki. W samej armii także nie rozumiano sensu uderzenia na Polskę. Świadczą o tym dokumenty wewnętrzne, w których odnotowywano „niewłaściwe opinie”. Padały głosy, że atak na Polskę jest sprzeczny z naukami Lenina i Stalina, z ideami pokojowej polityki Związku Radzieckiego i że krok ten zrównuje moralnie “ojczyznę proletariatu” z III Rzeszą.      

Jeden z obrońców Grodna wspominał, że już w czasie walk dwóch czerwonoarmistów właściwie poddało się Polakom ze słowami: „My Ukraińcy, nie będziemy wojować za władzę sowiecką”. 

Reżyser filmu o obronie Grodna Krzysztof Łukaszewicz nie zdecydował się pokazać tych niuansów – ani biedy radzieckiego wojska, ani wątpliwości części żołnierzy wobec najeżdżania Polski. 

Butelki z benzyną i karabiny sprzed wieku 

Gdy 17 września Armia Czerwona, licząca około pół miliona żołnierzy, wkroczyła do Polski, jej największym wrogiem był kompetencyjny chaos i braki w zaopatrzeniu. Wojska pancerne co jakiś czas musiały się zatrzymywać, by czekać na paliwo i części zamienne. Wygłodzonych żołnierzy od walki z polskimi burżujami bardziej interesowały słodycze i inne smakołyki dostępne w sklepach. Decyzję, kto właściwie ma szturmować Grodno, co rusz zmieniano, co wywoływało konsternację dowódców jednostek.  

Niestety Polacy też nie mieli czego przeciwstawić najeźdźcom. Grodno, które przed wojną było całkiem sporym ośrodkiem wojskowym, teraz mogło stanowić łatwy łup. Wojska wcześniej rzucono na zachód, do walki z Niemcami, a potem wysłano także żołnierzy do obrony Lwowa. Potencjał obronny miasta także bardzo ucierpiał w wyniku nalotów niemieckich – niemal w połowie zniszczone zostały składy broni i amunicji. 

W efekcie ostały się tylko 24 ciężkie karabiny maszynowe i dwa działa Bofors – ale były to działa przeciwlotnicze, a nie przeciwpancerne. 

Kadr z filmu Orlęta. Grodno '39

Kadr z filmu Orlęta. Grodno ’39  Fot. Magdalena Górfińska / WFDiF / TVP

Do dyspozycji były karabiny pamiętające drugą połowę XIX w., do których i tak było mało amunicji, oraz pokazane w filmie butelki z benzyną. Pomysłodawcą tej formy walki był pułkownik Bohdan Hulewicz, który na ten cel zarekwirował butelki z rozlewni spirytusowej. Ta skuteczna, jak się okazało, broń, choć świadczyła o pomysłowości Polaków, jednak pokazywała beznadzieję tego państwa.  

Liczba obrońców miasta wedle szacunków historyków wynosiła około dwóch tysięcy ludzi – w tym sporo młodzieży. Grodno było przygotowane do obrony w miarę skromnych możliwości – największe zasługi mają tu wiceprezydent Roman Sawicki oraz major Benedykt Serafin. Sprawnie działała szczególnie służba sanitarna i  łączność.  

Wiele do życzenia pozostawiała natomiast postawa gen. bryg. Józefa Olszyny-Wilczyńskiego, dowódcy III Okręgu Korpusu w Grodnie, który 18 września po prostu wyjechał z miasta, nie wydając żadnych rozkazów ani nie wyznaczając oficera jako dowódcy obrony.

Był wówczas podobno człowiekiem niezdolnym już do kierowania czymkolwiek. Zresztą wyjazd z Grodna na niewiele mu się zdał. Pojmany pod granicą z Litwą został rozstrzelany. Miasto opuścili także prezydent i starosta. 

Wobec słabości regularnych wojsk obrona Grodna była czynem mieszkańców, w tym także uczniów, studentów i harcerzy. Wieczorem 20 września do miasta dotarły posiłki dowodzone przez gen. Wacława Przeździeckiego, który przejął komendę w mieście. Polacy opierali się od 20 do 22 września, gdy czołgi w końcu wdarły się do centrum miasta. Nie sposób nie podziwiać młodych ludzi, którzy z poświęceniem, i do tego skutecznie, rzucali butelkami z benzyną w radzieckie czołgi, gdy część dorosłych, i to zajmujących oficjalne stanowiska, opuściła Grodno.  

Wedle szacunków w walce zginęło 53 żołnierzy radzieckich, trzy razy więcej było rannych. Polacy zniszczyli kompletnie pięć czołgów i 14 kolejnych uszkodzili. Straty polskie były znacznie większe, sięgające kilkuset zabitych – zwłaszcza że napastnik potem dokonywał egzekucji. 

 Żydzi, Białorusini? Komuniści!

W niespełna 60-tysięcznym Grodnie w 1939 r. drugą pod względem liczebności społeczność stanowili Żydzi. Relacje między nimi a Polakami zapewne odpowiadały średniej na kresach II RP, z tym że tu jeszcze świeża była pamięć o niedawnym pogromie. W czerwcu 1935 r. Polacy powybijali szyby w ponad 260 domach i sklepach żydowskich, pobili kilkudziesięciu Żydów, spośród których dwóch zmarło. Powodem było zabójstwo Polaka (na tle obyczajowym) przez dwóch Żydów.  

Panorama Grodna, na pierwszym planie most na Niemnie, rok 1938
Panorama Grodna, na pierwszym planie most na Niemnie, rok 1938  Domena publiczna

W Grodnie oczywiście mieszkali Żydzi religijni oraz syjoniści marzący o własnym państwie, byli też Żydzi zasymilowani, a wśród nich również grupa komunistów. Biorąc jednak pod uwagę liczbę Żydów w Polsce, było ich – trzeba to podkreślić – niewielu. A jednak to właśnie oni do dziś są wykorzystywani, szczególnie przez prawicowych historyków, do kształtowania obrazu reakcji Żydów na wkroczenie Armii Czerwonej. Kalka, według której ogół Żydów witał Sowietów kwiatami i bramami triumfalnymi, okazuje się w polskiej świadomości do dziś nadzwyczaj trwała.  

Ryszard Szawłowski publikujący pod pseudonimem Karol Liszewski w wydanej przed laty monografii i dokumentach na temat wkroczenia Związku Radzieckiego do Polski podkreślał, że wśród Żydów istniał spory odłam probolszewicki. „Wielu z nich żywiło zresztą niechęć czy wręcz nienawiść do Polaków i do Polski »w ogóle«” – Żydzi ci mieli ochoczo wstępować do milicji ludowej, aresztować i denuncjować Polaków. 

Szawłowski uważa, że komunistyczny odłam Żydów w Grodnie zorganizował coś na kształt powstania w celu zajęcia miasta. Podobna dywersja miała miejsce w nieodległym Skidlu. W obu przypadkach polskie siły zdołały stłumić komunistyczną akcję. 

Ciekawe, że we współczesnej rosyjskiej publicystyce, a właściwie propagandzie historycznej, te same działania przypisuje się… Białorusinom. Oto Aleksandr Szirokorad, znany ze swych antypolskich publikacji choćby na temat Katynia, w książce pod znaczącym tytułem „Ruś i Polska. Tysiącletnia wendetta” pisze, owszem, o powstaniu w Grodnie, ale Białorusinów, którym udało się opanować więzienie i uwolnić więźniów politycznych. Według niego Polacy, pacyfikując ten zryw, zabili 26 powstańców. Także w Skidlu za broń chwycić mieli „białoruscy chłopi”. 

Szawłowski podkreślał żydowskie pochodzenie komunistycznych dywersantów. Pytanie tylko, czy biorąc pod uwagę żydowską tożsamość i religijność oraz komunistyczną ideologię, w której ateizm i internacjonalizm odgrywają taką rolę, podkreślanie żydowskich korzeni wśród komunistów ma sens?  

Autor jednej z bardziej znanych relacji o obronie Grodna Sławomir Weraksa, wówczas student Uniwersytetu Stefana Batorego w Wilnie, wspominając o tłumieniu dywersji, wymieniał komunistów i czerwonych, nie skupiając się na ich pochodzeniu.  

Kto witał czerwonych z radością 

Najbardziej znana relacja wyszła jednak spod pióra inż. Grażyny Lipińskiej, do 1939 r. dyrektorki szkół zawodowych w Grodnie. Jej wspomnienia pt. „Jeśli zapomnę o nich” ukazały się w latach 80. w emigracyjnym wydawnictwie we Francji. Później już Szawłowski zarzucił wydawcy manipulowanie tekstem polegające na wycięciu bądź zniekształceniu fragmentów świadczących o żydowskim wsparciu dla radzieckiego napastnika.  

Według Lipińskiej Żydzi już 18 września, podszywając się pod ochotniczych obrońców miasta, próbowali wyłudzić broń z koszar. Ale i ona wspominała o lekarzu Żydzie, który był „zapatrzony w młodych podoficerów” i starał im się pomóc ze łzami w oczach. Szawłowski uznał za charakterystyczne, że ten fragment świadczący o Żydach pozytywnie akurat wydawca zachował. 

Najciekawsze, że sama Lipińska padła ofiarą antysemickich uprzedzeń. Tak przynajmniej wynika z relacji innego obrońcy, nauczyciela i działacza harcerskiego Brunona Hlebowicza. On to podczas patrolowania Grodna spostrzegł skuloną małą postać kobiecą przy trupie radzieckiego żołnierza. Wokół młodzi chłopcy wołali: „Bij ją, bo to Żydówka, szpieg”. Hlebowicz zdołał uratować kobietę przed linczem, zapewniając, że ją zna i że jest to Polka. A była to właśnie Lipińska.  

To także Lipińska opisała historię Tadeusza Jasińskiego, 13-letniego chłopca, którego najeźdźca miał przywiązać do czołgu i wykorzystać w charakterze żywej tarczy. W filmie pojawia się ten wątek, aczkolwiek zmodyfikowany i dostosowany do fabuły. Tam bowiem chłopak pali się żywcem, w relacji Lipińskiej zdołano go nawet ciężko rannego dostarczyć do szpitala, gdzie zmarł w objęciach matki, próbującej go pocieszyć informacjami o nadchodzącej odsieczy. 

Relacja Lipińskiej wywołała wściekły atak Szirokorada, który nazwał ją bajeczką. „Każdy może pójść w muzeum i zobaczyć, że na T-26 czy T-37 nie da się przymocować człowieka, nie zakrywając widoczności mechanika-kierowcy” – pisze rosyjski autor. 

Szirokarad przekonuje, że ciało człowieka nie nadaje się na ochronę czołgu, jakby nie rozumiejąc, że nie chodziło o wytrzymałość materiału, ale o psychiczny efekt.  

Centrum Grodna, ulica Azorska, rok 1937Centrum Grodna, ulica Azorska, rok 1937  Domena publiczna

Rosyjski autor, który podważa relację Lipińskiej, powołuje się za to na relację radzieckich czołgistów, wedle których pewien nastolatek ostrzegł ich, że pod mostem, na którym chcieli wjechać, podłożone są miny. 

Szirokorad, który obśmiewa polskie upamiętnianie obrony Grodna, pisze: „Bardzo już »mały Katyń« przypomina ten wielki. Chłopcy wskazujący drogę czołgistom przeobrazili się w ofiary rosyjskich sadystów”.  

Pisze także, że najzabawniejsze jest to, że chłopcy z Grodna naprawdę bywali w radzieckich czołgach – tyle że w środku. Jako przewodnicy, wskazujący drogę i strategiczne punkty. Młodzieńcy ci mieli opuścić miasto jeszcze przed wojną. Co do tego polskie świadectwa są zgodne i znane są trzy nazwiska: Aleksandrowicz, Lifszyc i Margolis. 

Lifszyc, który miał wcześniej zabić w Grodnie marynarza nożem na jakiejś zabawie, teraz, po wzięciu do niewoli, został zabity kolbą przez jednego z nastoletnich obrońców miasta. Aleksandrowicz został pojmany i groziła mu podobna śmierć jak w przypadku Lifszyca, ale uratowali go oficerowie policji, „co wywołało niezadowolenie wśród tłumu” – jak pisze Szawłowski. Margolis zginął w czasie walk.

Żydowski chłopak bohaterem 

Film Łukaszewicza opowiada historię fikcyjnego żydowskiego bohatera, ale Grodno miało swego prawdziwego żydowskiego bohatera. Relację o tym znajdujemy w opracowaniu Szawłowskiego. Wedle Zenona Ungara, wówczas ucznia gimnazjum im. Mickiewicza, w oddziale kaprala podchorążego Woźniaka jako ochotnicy służyli także jego dwaj koledzy Chaim Margolis i Oszer Szereszewski. Pierwszy był synem dyrektora fabryki tytoniu, drugi – właściciela drukarni. To właśnie Margolis (nosił to samo nazwisko co chłopiec, który miał wskazywać drogę Sowietom) wraz z Woźniakiem, gdy ich oddział został zauważony przez napastników, pozorując chęć poddania się, podeszli z granatami pod radzieckie czołgi oraz grupę milicji ludowej składającej się przeważnie z młodzieży żydowskiej. Ungar relacjonował: „obaj z wysoko podniesionymi rękami szli w stronę czołgów i milicji, która miała skierowane na nich karabiny. Odległość od nas do Rosjan i milicji nie była większa niż 10-15 metrów. Woźniak i Margolis byli już pomiędzy czołgami. Wolno zacząłem sobie zdawać sprawę, co zamierzają. Mały rosyjski oficer wysunął się spoza czołgu na ich spotkanie. I nagle błysk! Huk! Dym”. 

Gdy Ungar zdołał uciec w bezpieczne miejsce, obejrzał się wokół. „Prócz podchorążego i Margolisa wszyscy byli ze mną”. Dodajmy, że Woźniak, przed wojną nauczyciel, wyraźnie powiedział, że pójdzie w kierunku czołgów sam, a wszyscy chłopcy, gdy nastąpi wybuch, mają uciekać przez dziurę w płocie. Margolis, nastoletni żydowski chłopak, poświęcił więc życie za Polskę i przyjaciół świadomie i dobrowolnie.  


Korzystałem m.in. z : Czesław K. Grzelak, “Kresy w czerwieni 1939” (Warszawa 1998), Roger Moorhouse, “Polska 1939. Pierwsi przeciw Hitlerowi” (Kraków 2019), Ryszard Szawłowski, “Wojna polsko-bolszewicka 1939. Tom 1 i Tom 2″ (Warszawa 1997), Aleksandr Szirokorad, ‘Ruś i Polsza. Tysjaczeletniaja wendetta” (Moskwa 2011).   


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Lapid tells UN Palestinian state right for Israel but can’t be terror base

Lapid tells UN Palestinian state right for Israel but can’t be terror base

TOVAH LAZAROFF


Prime Minister Yair Lapid tells UN General Assembly that Iran will only be stopped with credible military threat

.
Israel’s Prime Minister Yair Lapid addresses the 77th session of the United Nations General Assembly at the UN headquarters in New York City on September 22, 2022. / (photo credit: TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images))

The future Palestinian state that will exist next to Israel must be peaceful and not terror-based, Prime Minister Yair Lapid told the United Nations General Assembly on Thursday afternoon, just before returning to Israel.

“If that condition is met then the best path  forward is “an agreement with the Palestinians, based on two states for two peoples,” Lapid said.

This “is the right thing for Israel’s security, for Israel’s economy and for the future of our children.”

His statement about a future Palestinian state and his affirmation of a two-state resolution to the conflict, markers the strongest language that an Israeli premier has used with regard to Palestinian sovereignty since the days of former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. It is the first since 2016 that an Israeli leader has spoken of the two-state solution when addressing the UNGA.

“Despite all the obstacles, still today a large majority of Israelis support the vision of this two-state solution. I am one of them,” Lapid said. 

“We have only one condition: That a future Palestinian state will be a peaceful one.

That it will not become another terror base from which to threaten the well-being, and the very existence of Israel,” Lapid said.

“Peace is not a compromise. It is the most courageous decision we can make. 

Lapid arrived in New York on Tuesday morning to join the world leaders gathered for the high-level opening sessions of the 77th UNGA. He arrived at a time when it appeared that US President Joe Biden’s efforts to revive the 2015 Iran deal had come to a standstill. In his meetings with the world leaders and the in his speech to the plenum, Lapid said that the time had come to abandon that document and to negotiate a new deal.

“The only way to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, is to put a credible military threat on the table,” Lapid said.

“And then – and only then – to negotiate a Longer and Stronger deal with them. 

“It needs to be made clear to Iran, that if it advances its nuclear program, the world will not respond with words, but with military force. 

“Every time a threat like that was put on the table in the past, Iran stopped, and retreated,” Lapid said.

He linked Iran’s threats to annihilate the Jewish state with Holocaust in which six million Jews were killed.

Lapid swore that Israel would do everything it could to safeguard its citizens and to stop Iran destroying its state.

‘We will do whatever it takes: Iran will not get a nuclear weapon. We will not stand by while there are those who try to kill us. Not again. Never Again,” he said.

Lapid charged that was fueling global and regional terrorism, particularly against Israel and that the UN had failed to act when faced with this threat.

“Iran has declared time and time again that it is interested in the “total destruction” of the State of Israel. 

“And this building is silent,” Lapid said evoking the accusation often made against the global community that also stood silent during the Holocaust.

This is not the only way the United Nations  had failed Israel, Lapid said. It has allowed its institution to be used as a platform by which to spread falsehoods against the Jewish state.

Israel is not a “guest in this building,” Lapid said, explaining that “Israel is a proud sovereign nation” and “an equal member of the United Nations. 

The United Nations actions toward Israel could be construed as antisemitism, Lapid said. 

“Antisemitism is the willingness to believe the worst about the Jews, without questioning. Antisemitism is judging Israel by a different standard than any other country,” Lapid said.

He ended on a note of hope by referencing the Abraham Accords, under whose rubric Israel normalized ties with four Arab countries, the United Arab Emirates, Morocco, Bahrain and Sudan in 2020.

He called on other Muslim and Arab countries to also normalize ties with Israel.

Israel seeks peace with our neighbors. 

“We call upon every Muslim country — from Saudi Arabia to Indonesia — to recognize that, and to come talk to us. Our hand is outstretched for peace.”


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


Tisha Be’av: What’s changed over time for Jews and Israel?

Tisha Be’av: What’s changed over time for Jews and Israel?

AHARON E. WEXLER


This Tisha Be’Av, we mourn, not because of our situation today but because we tie ourselves to the past and see ourselves as a link to it; but we also see ourselves as a link to the future.

.
‘THE JETSONS’ world of the future is the world we already inhabit.
(photo credit: MARK ANDERSON/FLICKR)

I recently saw a meme pop up on my Facebook feed a few times. It shows a picture of the airplane flown by the Wright brothers at Kitty Hawk and another picture of a man on the moon and makes the rather remarkable point that only 66 years separate those two photos. It made me immediately think about that famous picture of the liquidation of the Warsaw Ghetto; you know, the one where the boy is raising his hands in terror while the SS officer points a machine gun at him.

It is far more remarkable to me that less than 25 years separate between that photograph and David Rubinger’s photo of the soldiers liberating the Western Wall in the Six Day War. (By the way, that SS officer, identified as Josef Blosche, would live to see both Jerusalem liberated and a man walk on the moon! Blosche was only executed for his crimes on July 29, 1969.)

I share this with you because this Shabbat marks the 1,952nd year since the destruction of the Temple on the 9th of Av in the year 70 CE. (Because of the sanctity of the Sabbath, there is no mourning on that day and all observances and commemorations of that catastrophe are pushed off till the next day.) If you think about it, there are less than 50 generations separating us from Jerusalem’s destruction. This is but a blink in the eye of human history.

We live in a generation of incredible fast-paced change.

Did you know that according to “the Internet” (and we all know everything written there is true) George Jetson was born this week on July 31, 2022? The world of the future depicted in the cartoon show, The Jetsons, is the world we already inhabit even though it is set 40 years from now.

These changes are happening so swiftly that it is difficult to navigate them and adjust the scripts of our lives to accommodate those changes. The return to the Land of Israel and Jewish Sovereignty is one such change, and it is really hard to understand how to fit Israel into our lives as Jews. So much of Judaism as we know it today was forged in the Exile and in response to the harsh conditions of Exile that it makes incorporating Israel a very difficult task.

‘THE DESTRUCTION of the Temple of Jerusalem,’ Francesco Hayez, 1867 (credit: Wikimedia Commons)

Does the return of the Jews to the Land of Israel mean we are in the messianic age? On the one hand the messianic age had always been defined by that return, on the other hand, we are not yet beating any swords in plough shares.

Keep in mind that the actual return to Zion has been beyond anyone’s imagination. We are stronger and more powerful militarily and economically than most countries in the world. Israel is flourishing in ways unimaginable even 25 years ago! Had Israel been established as some third world country where kids played kick-the-can in the streets while raw sewage flowed beside them, one could still point to Israel as the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. And yet, while we are so beyond that, we still have not had any real change in Jewish practice.

BUT IS that, perhaps, a good thing?

I get that there is a real disconnect in praying for the restoration of Israel while standing in the Knesset. I also get that mourning for the Temple’s destruction in modern Jerusalem seems incongruous and yet I feel privileged to do so.

As history does change, these rituals help anchor us to our past which in turn gives us a compass for the future. One of the most important missions we have as Jews is to prevent ourselves from becoming unrecognizable to our future selves. That does not mean we cannot change but that change must be evolutionary and not revolutionary. Thomas Jefferson would have been startled to have seen a black man sitting in his seat in the White House, consulting a female member of his cabinet, but if we were to explain to him that we have now expanded his words that “all men are created equal” to include every human being, I think he would be very happy.

The Talmud imagines Moses magically transported to the classroom of Rabbi Akiva 1,000 years in the future and Moses cannot follow the lecture. He is growing frustrated until a student raises his hand and asks as to the source of a particular teaching to which Rabbi Akiva replies that it was a tradition handed to Moses at Sinai. At that point, Moses breathed a sigh of relief when he realized that what Rabbi Akiva was teaching was the evolution of the very same Torah taught by Moses.

It is our ties to the past that allow us to move forward and we can do so with confidence because of how firmly connected we are to what came before us. I think this is one of the hallmarks of Orthodoxy as well. If Rabbi Akiva would be transported to our time, I have no doubt that the synagogue, study hall, and home he would feel most comfortable in would be Orthodox. Yes, he too would be taken aback by some of our practices, but we would be able to open the Talmud together and trace the interpretation and observances through the development of Halacha through the millennia.

This Tisha Be’Av, we mourn, not because of our situation today but because we tie ourselves to the past and see ourselves as a link to it; but, more importantly, we also see ourselves as a link to the future. Our acceptance of the Torah in our day is really only a responsibility to give it over to the next generation. We mourn, not just for a distant past but to remain true to ourselves and our progeny. ■


The writer holds a doctorate in Jewish philosophy and teaches in post-high-school yeshivot and midrashot in Jerusalem.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com