Jeśli to ludobójstwo, dlaczego dostarczenie dowodów może poczekać do 2029 roku?

Ben M. Freeman

Sprzeczność między oskarżeniem a pilnością sprawy

Ludobójstwo jest najstraszliwszą zbrodnią przeciwko ludzkości. Samo to słowo przywołuje jedne z najmroczniejszych kart historii: Holokaust, Rwandę, Kambodżę i Srebrenicę. Oznacza nie tylko masową śmierć, lecz także celową próbę zniszczenia grupy narodowej, etnicznej, rasowej lub religijnej. Ze względu na ogrom tej zbrodni oskarżenia o ludobójstwo tradycyjnie miały wyjątkową wagę. Jeśli dochodzi do ludobójstwa, poczucie pilności nie jest kwestią wyboru. Liczy się każdy dzień.

Dlatego najnowszy rozwój wydarzeń w sprawie wniesionej przez Republikę Południowej Afryki przeciwko Izraelowi jest tak wymowny. Wnioskując o znaczące wydłużenie terminu na złożenie odpowiedzi, RPA niezamierzenie uwidoczniła to, co wcześniej próbowała zaciemnić. Gdyby rzeczywiście uważała, że Izrael dopuszcza się ludobójstwa, zwłoka byłaby nie do przyjęcia. Tymczasem państwo, które od dwóch lat utrzymuje, że ludobójstwo trwa, zgodziło się na harmonogram mogący przesunąć dalsze etapy postępowania głęboko w następną dekadę. Trudno nie dostrzec płynącego z tego przekazu: nie ma sytuacji nadzwyczajnej, ponieważ nie ma ludobójstwa.

Israel Foreign Ministry@IsraelMFA

Od ponad dwóch lat mówi się, że Izrael dopuszcza się ludobójstwa w Strefie Gazy. Oskarżenie to było powtarzane przez aktywistów, polityków, środowiska akademickie, dziennikarzy i organizacje międzynarodowe z niezwykłą pewnością siebie. W wielu kręgach uznaje się, że debata już się zakończyła. Wyrok został wydany. Jedyne pytanie, jakie rzekomo pozostaje, brzmi: dlaczego reszta świata jeszcze tego nie dostrzegła?

Jednak ponad dwa lata po wniesieniu sprawy do Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Republika Południowej Afryki wystąpiła o dodatkowe osiemnaście miesięcy na przedstawienie kolejnej części swojej argumentacji – i taki termin otrzymała. Jeśli rzeczywiście mamy do czynienia z tak jednoznacznym przypadkiem ludobójstwa, jak twierdzi wielu komentatorów, można zasadnie zapytać: dlaczego to ludobójstwo może poczekać?

A jeśli dowody są tak przytłaczające, dlaczego potrzeba jeszcze więcej czasu, aby je przedstawić? To właśnie sprzeczność tkwiąca w samym centrum oskarżenia o ludobójstwo. W mediach społecznościowych, na uniwersytetach i w znacznej części międzynarodowej prasy ludobójstwo przedstawiane jest jako oczywistość. Tymczasem przed sądem udowodnienie tego twierdzenia wydaje się niemożliwe.

Ludobójstwo wymaga wykazania zamiaru

Nie powinno nas to zaskakiwać. Pytanie prawne nigdy nie dotyczyło tego, czy Gaza cierpi. Cierpi. Nie dotyczyło też tego, czy ginęli cywile albo czy niszczono budynki. Wszystkie te fakty mogą istnieć bez ludobójstwa. Pytanie prawne zawsze brzmiało: czy Izrael celowo dąży do zniszczenia narodu palestyńskiego jako narodu.

Po ponad dwóch latach wojny dostępne dowody nie tylko nie potwierdzają istnienia zamiaru ludobójczego. Wskazują wręcz w przeciwnym kierunku. Krytycy Izraela często odwołują się do liczby ofiar, operacji wojskowych i kontrowersyjnych wypowiedzi poszczególnych polityków, lecz nie zdołali wykazać istnienia polityki państwowej zmierzającej do zniszczenia narodu palestyńskiego. Izrael wielokrotnie ostrzegał ludność cywilną o konieczności opuszczenia stref walk, kontaktował się bezpośrednio z Palestyńczykami za pomocą telefonów, wiadomości tekstowych, nagrań głosowych i ulotek, a także wyznaczał trasy ewakuacyjne i korytarze humanitarne.

John Spencer, przewodniczący programu Urban Warfare Studies w Modern War Institute przy West Point, argumentował, że działania te przyczyniły się do utrzymania stosunku liczby zabitych bojowników do liczby zabitych cywilów na poziomie około 1:1 do 1:1,5, który określa jako historycznie niski dla współczesnych działań wojennych prowadzonych w terenie miejskim. Choć dokładne dane pozostają przedmiotem sporów, takie działania trudno pogodzić z twierdzeniem, że celem Izraela jest zniszczenie narodu palestyńskiego. Spustoszenie nie jest równoznaczne z ludobójstwem. Konwencja w sprawie zapobiegania i karania zbrodni ludobójstwa wymaga wykazania zamiaru zniszczenia danej grupy, a po ponad dwóch latach analiz dowody na taki zamiar nie zostały przedstawione — ponieważ, jak twierdzi autor, nie istnieją.

To właśnie dlatego oskarżenie opierało się bardziej na retoryce niż na dowodach. Ludobójstwo stało się mniej kategorią prawną, a bardziej narzędziem politycznym. Gdy słowo to zostaje użyte, niesie ze sobą ogromny ładunek emocjonalny i moralny. Przekształca złożony konflikt w prostą opowieść o sprawcach i ofiarach. Jednak poważne oskarżenia wymagają czegoś więcej niż sloganów.

Jeśli rzeczywiście dochodzi do ludobójstwa, powinny istnieć góry dowodów. Jeśli sprawa jest tak jednoznaczna, jak twierdzą aktywiści, nie powinno być potrzeby prowadzenia przez lata dodatkowych sporów przed najwyższym sądem świata. Jeśli fakty są tak oczywiste, jak wielokrotnie zapewniano opinię publiczną, proces prawny powinien jedynie potwierdzać oczywistą rzeczywistość, zamiast wciąż zmagać się z głęboko spornym oskarżeniem.

Tymczasem wydaje się, że jest odwrotnie. Im dłużej trwa postępowanie, tym bardziej widoczne staje się, że pewność towarzysząca oskarżeniu od początku przewyższała siłę dowodów mających je uzasadniać.

Wyrok jeszcze nie zapadł

Wniosek Republiki Południowej Afryki o dodatkowy czas przypomina, że oskarżenia nie są dowodami, a slogany nie są wyrokami. Lata po wniesieniu sprawy najwyższy sąd świata wciąż jest daleki od wydania ostatecznego rozstrzygnięcia. Pewność dominująca w debacie publicznej jest wyraźnie nieobecna na sali sądowej.

Republika Południowej Afryki może kontynuować postępowanie aż do 2029 roku. Aktywiści mogą nadal skandować „ludobójstwo”. Dziennikarze mogą nadal powtarzać to oskarżenie. Jednak powtarzanie nie jest dowodem. Izrael nie dopuszcza się ludobójstwa. Fakt, że osoby wysuwające takie oskarżenie potrzebują kolejnych lat postępowania, aby je wykazać, jedynie uwidacznia dystans między polityczną retoryką a rzeczywistością prawną.

Link do oryginału: https://honestreporting.com/if-its-genocide-why-can-it-wait-until-2029/

Honest Recording, 2 czerwca 2026

Doctors Without Borders: Promoting Hate Through Medicine

Gerald M. Steinberg

• [L]ike other powerful groups in the NGO industry, MSF has become a major platform for political and ideological propaganda campaigns that often accompany wars and terror atrocities.
  .
• A major new report by the NGO Monitor research institute… documents how MSF has been transformed from a medical humanitarian organization into one of the most aggressive institutional promoters of anti-Israel messaging, most notably the canard that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
  .
• This is far from the only example of MSF’s participation in demonization campaigns that are entirely inconsistent with the humanitarian agenda.
  .
• On October 7, while Hamas terrorists were still murdering and raping civilians in Israel, dragging hostages into Gaza, and live-streaming their “conquests,” MSF officials were accusing Israel of war crimes.
  .
• Dr. Ghassan Abu Sittah, an MSF-affiliated anti-Israel activist, participated in a grotesque press conference organized by the Hamas-controlled Gaza Ministry of Health, to promote the libel.
  .
• In a massive understatement, the text acknowledged that MSF lacked the legal expertise to determine genocidal intent – the central element of the crime under international law. But that disclaimer did not stop the organization from running with the libel. At least 272 times.
  .
• In parallel, MSF was deafeningly silent on Hamas’ real war crimes: embedding of military (terrorist) infrastructure in hospitals (documented by NGO Monitor), schools, and civilian neighborhoods; the theft of humanitarian aid; and the continued holding of Israeli civilian hostages. Across MSF’s international social media feeds, hostages were scarcely mentioned – appearing as the primary subject of only three posts out of hundreds.
  .
• By embracing false and defamatory accusations, Doctors Without Borders and all who are associated with this NGO have undermined fundamental moral and humanitarian values. They have traded white coats and medical missions for hate slogans and lies.

A major new report documents how Doctors Without Borders (Médecins Sans Frontières, MSF) has been transformed from a medical humanitarian organization into one of the most aggressive institutional promoters of anti-Israel messaging, most notably the canard that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Pictured: People walk past an MSF clinic in Gaza City on January 11, 2026. (Photo by Omar Al-Qataa/AFP via Getty Images)

For half a century, Doctors Without Borders enjoyed an enviable reputation. They were known and respected for their work in war zones and disaster areas, where volunteers and employees treated the wounded and sick. Known globally as Médecins Sans Frontières, or MSF, the NGO built its credibility on the principle that doctors are there to save lives, not to wage political campaigns.

That reputation is now largely gone, and like other powerful groups in the NGO industry, MSF has become a major platform for political and ideological propaganda campaigns that often accompany wars and terror atrocities.

A major new report by the NGO Monitor research institute, which I founded and lead, documents how MSF has been transformed from a medical humanitarian organization into one of the most aggressive institutional promoters of anti-Israel messaging, most notably the canard that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

Since Hamas’ October 7, 2023 massacre, MSF and its regional affiliates have falsely accused Israel of “genocide” at least 272 times on social media. This disturbing fact should speak for itself – genocide is not a minor rhetorical flourish. The term was coined by Polish-Jewish jurist Raphael Lemkin to describe the deliberate destruction of a people in the gas chambers and killing fields of the Holocaust. Genocide carries extraordinary moral weight. Historically, and until recently, responsible institutions and individuals have used the term with great caution.

This is far from the only example of MSF’s participation in demonization campaigns that are entirely inconsistent with the humanitarian agenda. On October 7, while Hamas terrorists were still murdering and raping civilians in Israel, dragging hostages into Gaza, and live-streaming their “conquests,” MSF officials were accusing Israel of war crimes. This NGO’s first statement reduced the largest mass murder of Jews since the Holocaust to a vague “escalation between Israel and Gaza.”

That framing defined MSF’s activities throughout the conflict and continues to this day, accompanied by blatantly false accusations.

For example, on October 17, 2023, an explosion occurred near Gaza’s Al-Ahli Arab Hospital. MSF immediately issued statements describing the incident as a “massacre” and promoted physician Ghassan Abu-Sittah as a key witness blaming Israel. Dr. Ghassan Abu Sittah, an MSF-affiliated anti-Israel activist, participated in a grotesque press conference, organized by the Hamas-controlled Gaza Ministry of Health, to promote the libel.

Assessments by the United States, Canada and France, and an investigation by The New York Times, concluded the damage was caused by a misfired rocket launched by Palestinian Islamic Jihad, but the MSF-led campaign never retracted the lie, spread among millions of cumulative social media followers.

That failure matters because MSF’s authority rests on public trust. When doctors on the ground speak, journalists, diplomats, and policymakers listen. And when the organization’s statements promote the opposite of the humanitarian principles it purports to support, the consequences extend far beyond a single news cycle.

In Gaza, MSF’s role in demonization and false accusations against Israel expanded. In December 2023, MSF’s international president Christos Christou accused Israel of “incessant and indiscriminate warfare” and collective punishment. In October 2024, MSF described Israeli operations as “unmitigated slaughter.”

These attacks were the prelude to the genocide canard.

In December 2024, MSF published a report titled “Life in a Death Trap,” joining the hate-filled chorus alleging that Israel was carrying out ethnic cleansing and genocide. In a massive understatement, the text acknowledged that MSF lacked the legal expertise to determine genocidal intent – the central element of the crime under international law. But that disclaimer did not stop the organization from running with the libel. At least 272 times.

In parallel, MSF was deafeningly silent on Hamas’ real war crimes: embedding of military (terrorist) infrastructure in hospitals (documented by NGO Monitor), schools, and civilian neighborhoods; the theft of humanitarian aid; and the continued holding of Israeli civilian hostages. Across MSF’s international social media feeds, hostages were scarcely mentioned – appearing as the primary subject of only three posts out of hundreds.

The tragedy is that MSF did not need to choose between treating patients and becoming a partisan actor. Humanitarian groups can deliver aid while maintaining discipline, precision, and moral seriousness. Many do.

MSF chose the opposite path.

By embracing false and defamatory accusations, Doctors Without Borders and all who are associated with this NGO have undermined fundamental moral and humanitarian values. They have traded white coats and medical missions for hate slogans and lies.

Prof. Gerald M. Steinberg is founder and president of NGO Monitor.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s War to Destroy the United States from Within: Part I

Robert Williams

• “The Ikhwan [Muslim Brothers] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” — From the Muslim Brotherhood’s 1991 “Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America.”
  .
• “What the Islamic movement is doing… is they are waging war, total war. Again, not primarily violent, but total war: Counter-intelligence, espionage, subversion, economic warfare… in order to overthrow the government and replace it with an Islamic state under Sharia. Not only is that what they teach their children. It’s what Islamic law requires.” — John Guandolo, National Security Consultant, former FBI agent, April 2026.
  .
• In Texas, the jihad to transform the US and Western civilization prompted the state’s Governor Greg Abbott, last November, to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as foreign terrorist organizations and transnational criminal organizations.
  .
• “The Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR have long made their goals clear: to forcibly impose Sharia law and establish Islam’s ‘mastership of the world.’ The actions taken by the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR to support terrorism across the globe and subvert our laws through violence, intimidation, and harassment are unacceptable… These radical extremists are not welcome in our state and are now prohibited from acquiring any real property interest in Texas.” — Texas Governor Greg Abbott, November 18, 2025.
  .
• The man behind the EPIC/Meadow project in Texas is Islamic scholar Yasir Qadhi, who is Chairman of the Fiqh Council of North America, which is named in the Brotherhood’s “Explanatory Memorandum” as one of the organizations involved in the “civilizational jihad”/grand jihad strategy in North America.
  .
• “[O]n every major college campus in Texas, you’ve got the Muslim Brotherhood’s Muslim Student Association…. You have Hamas doing business as Students for Justice in Palestine on college campuses… kind of under the umbrella of American Muslims for Palestine…You have… dozens of properties in Texas owned by the North American Islamic Trust [NAIT], which is not only a Muslim Brotherhood organization, but in the largest terrorism financing trial in American history, US vs Holyland Foundation trial, which was adjudicated in Dallas, Texas in 2008. NAIT was not only identified as a Muslim Brotherhood organization, but an organization that directly funds Hamas organizations and leaders. And it’s operating all over Texas. You have the Islamic Society of North America, also identified in that trial as a Muslim Brotherhood organization directly funding Hamas, operating in Texas with subsidiaries… and the list goes on… numerous Islamic schools… and now you’ve got right here in Garland a massive Quranic academy… So it’s just… everywhere. And Yaser Qhadi, who’s running the Plano Islamic Center, is not only a senior Muslim Brotherhood jurist. He is the senior Muslim Brotherhood jurist. He’s the chairman of the Fiqh Council of North America, which is the Muslim Brotherhood’s legal entity that oversees the entire Islamic movement in North America….” — John Guandolo, April 2026.
  .
• Qadhi, of course, is not the only Brotherhood operative in Texas creating parallel Islamic societies. According to RAIR Foundation: “Longtime Muslim Brotherhood operative Main Al Qudah is building a $70–80 million, 30-acre fully autonomous Sharia-adherent Islamic enclave in rural Katy, Texas — a self-sustaining parallel society featuring a grand mosque, K-12 school, Islamic university, apartments, health clinic, sports fields, and its own strip mall, while openly using Texas taxpayer school voucher funds to raise the next generation of Muslims from cradle to grave with almost no contact with the non-Muslim world outside.”

The Muslim Brotherhood is actually hard at work establishing an Islamic state based on sharia law in the United States. They have, in fact, been at it for decades. Pictured: The logo of the Muslim Brotherhood.

In March, US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard warned that “the spread of Islamist ideology, in some cases led by individuals and organizations associated with the Muslim Brotherhood” poses a threat as it seeks to establish “an Islamist caliphate which governs based on Sharia.” Gabbard went on to say that “there are increasing examples of this in various European countries.”

Not quite. The Muslim Brotherhood is actually hard at work establishing an Islamic state based on sharia law in the United States. They have, in fact, been at it for decades. The 1991 Muslim Brotherhood “Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America,” provides a detailed blueprint of how to destroy the US and Canada. According to the memorandum:

“The Ikhwan [Muslim Brothers] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions… It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes.”

Even more forthrightly, the Muslim Brotherhood blueprint is part of a 100-year plan to take over the world as a whole. A document titled “The Muslim Brotherhood Project: Towards A Worldwide Strategy for Islamic Policy” (known as “The Project”) was discovered during a 2001 police raid by Swiss authorities on the home of the late Youssef Nada, who was a prominent Brotherhood operative in Switzerland.

The Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy (ISGAP) wrote in its recent report, “The Muslim Brotherhood’s Strategic Entryism into the United States: A Systemic Analysis”:

“Rather than relying on rapid mobilization or revolutionary confrontation, the Brotherhood envisions societal transformation as the cumulative result of incremental influence across education, media, law, civil society, and political structures…. The 100-year horizon embedded in ‘The Project’ underscores the Brotherhood’s belief that durable transformation occurs not through disruption but through the patient, deliberate reconfiguration of society from within.”

John Guandolo, a former FBI agent who educates lawmakers and the public about the Brotherhood’s operations in the US, put it even more bluntly in a recent interview:

“What the Islamic movement is doing… is they are waging war, total war. Again, not primarily violent, but total war: Counter-intelligence, espionage, subversion, economic warfare… in order to overthrow the government and replace it with an Islamic state under Sharia. Not only is that what they teach their children. It’s what Islamic law requires.”

Texas is a particularly blistering example of the extent to which the Muslim Brotherhood has been successful in pushing civilizational jihad, according to John Guandolo.

“Texas is already in a ‘pre‑kinetic’ phase of jihad, with an expanding network of mosques, Islamic schools, and Muslim Brotherhood‑linked organizations… working to subvert American law and replace it with Sharia.”

The founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hassan al-Banna, stipulated:

“Make every effort for the establishment of educational, social, economic and scientific institutions and the establishment of mosques, schools, clinics, shelters, clubs…”

In Texas, the jihad to transform the US and Western civilization prompted the state’s Governor Greg Abbott, last November, to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) as foreign terrorist organizations and transnational criminal organizations.

“The Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR have long made their goals clear: to forcibly impose Sharia law and establish Islam’s ‘mastership of the world,'” Abbott said.

“The actions taken by the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR to support terrorism across the globe and subvert our laws through violence, intimidation, and harassment are unacceptable… These radical extremists are not welcome in our state and are now prohibited from acquiring any real property interest in Texas.”

Proponents of the Muslim Brotherhood in Texas are aggressively trying to acquire real estate to establish Islamic enclaves such as EPIC city, recently rebranded as “The Meadow“. The Meadow is to be an exclusively Muslim residential enclave, encompassing more than 1,000 homes, a new mosque, Muslim schools, sports facilities and Muslim communal institutions. So far, Texas has been successful in putting a halt to the project, however numerous lawsuits are forging ahead to push the project through.

The Texas branch of CAIR follows the Brotherhood playbook of deflecting scrutiny by claiming opposition to the project constitutes an “Islamophobic witch hunt.”

The man behind the EPIC/Meadow project in Texas is Islamic scholar Yasir Qadhi, who is Chairman of the Fiqh Council of North America, which is named in the Brotherhood’s “Explanatory Memorandum” as one of the organizations involved in the “civilizational jihad”/grand jihad strategy in North America. In short, Qadhi is about as Muslim Brotherhood as it gets.

Qadhi, according to John Guandolo, prior to targeting Texas, was a Muslim Brotherhood operative in Tennessee:

“I knew him from being in the FBI because he’s a senior Muslim Brotherhood leader, now one of the most prominent in North America, but was clearly an up and comer… back in 2004 or 2005…. Then he became the scholar, Islamic scholar at the Memphis Islamic Center in Tennessee. And… the Muslim Brotherhood made Tennessee their primary target because from their perspective they viewed Tennessee as the buckle of the Bible belt.”

When Qadhi moved in 2019 to Texas, Guandolo noted,

“They started ramping up their activities here… you have just in Dallas alone over 350 halal restaurants. We have now as of last week 314 mosques across Texas… on every major college campus in Texas, you’ve got the Muslim Brotherhood’s Muslim Student Association…. You’ve got Hamas doing business as CAIR in Texas… You have Hamas doing business as EMgage operating in Texas. You have Hamas doing business as Students for Justice in Palestine on college campuses… kind of under the umbrella of American Muslims for Palestine…You have… dozens of properties in Texas owned by the North American Islamic Trust [NAIT], which is not only a Muslim Brotherhood organization, but in the largest terrorism financing trial in American history, US vs Holyland Foundation trial, which was adjudicated in Dallas, Texas in 2008. NAIT was not only identified as a Muslim Brotherhood organization, but an organization that directly funds Hamas organizations and leaders. And it’s operating all over Texas. You have the Islamic Society of North America, also identified in that trial as a Muslim Brotherhood organization directly funding Hamas, operating in Texas with subsidiaries…and the list goes on… numerous Islamic schools… and now you’ve got right here in Garland a massive Quranic academy… So it’s just… everywhere. And Yaser Qhadi, who’s running the Plano Islamic Center, is not only a senior Muslim Brotherhood jurist. He is the senior Muslim Brotherhood jurist. He’s the chairman of the Fiqh Council of North America, which is the Muslim Brotherhood’s legal entity that oversees the entire Islamic movement in North America to ensure that everything they’re doing is compliant with Sharia.”

Qadhi, of course, is not the only Brotherhood operative in Texas creating parallel Islamic societies. According to RAIR Foundation:

“Longtime Muslim Brotherhood operative Main Al Qudah is building a $70–80 million, 30-acre fully autonomous Sharia-adherent Islamic enclave in rural Katy, Texas — a self-sustaining parallel society featuring a grand mosque, K-12 school, Islamic university, apartments, health clinic, sports fields, and its own strip mall, while openly using Texas taxpayer school voucher funds to raise the next generation of Muslims from cradle to grave with almost no contact with the non-Muslim world outside.”

Meanwhile, Islamic associations are now visiting American schools, seeking to indoctrinate American kids with sharia law – an effort at proselytizing known as dawa. At Wylie East High School in Texas, an Islamic group called “Why Islam, ” without approval, set up a booth at the front of the school during school hours and began courting students. The “Why Islam” group is an official outreach project run by the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), widely regarded as a Muslim Brotherhood group.

“They were giving out hijabs to girls throughout the high school, and they were giving out Qurans, and they also had pamphlets about Sharia law,” Marco Hunter-Lopez, president of the High School Republicans at Wylie East High School said in videos that raised the issue of the Muslim Brotherhood outreach at his school.

In February 2025, Wylie East Principal Tiffany Doolan reportedly posted an image on Instagram of herself wearing a hijab on campus as part of last year’s World Hijab Day celebration organized by MSA students. “I LOVED this experience!” she wrote.

Robert Williams is based in the United States.